Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question: Isn't it Constitutionally *forbidden* for Govt to compete with private sector?
Me | 6/30/2009 | DGHoodini

Posted on 06/30/2009 10:20:49 AM PDT by DGHoodini

It's been a while since I've read our foundational documents, so my memory is a bit fuzzy, but isn't it specifically spelled out that the Govt is *forbidden* from competing with public and private businesses?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education
KEYWORDS: business; compete; constitution

1 posted on 06/30/2009 10:20:50 AM PDT by DGHoodini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

It says Congress can regulate interestate commerce but not intrastate.. other than that nothing springs to mind

then again, 90% of legislation since the New Deal has been unconstitutional


2 posted on 06/30/2009 10:23:43 AM PDT by wrhssaxensemble (Piyush "Bobby" Jindal in 2012 after Obama makes an even bigger mess of everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

If government has to openly compete with private enterprise, private enterprise will always win. Forbidden or not.

Now the problem is “regulation” of industry and Government determining the outcome of who wins and loses.

That is the real question.

It is about Freedom or Slavery in it’s simplest form.


3 posted on 06/30/2009 10:23:57 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

If so wouldn’t UPS and FedEx have sued the Post Office?
Wakenhut/Pinkerton have sued the FBI/DEA/State and Local Police? And Blackwater have sued the Department of Defense?


4 posted on 06/30/2009 10:31:11 AM PDT by The_Repugnant_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Repugnant_Conservative

Maybe those entities NEED to be sued anyway.


5 posted on 06/30/2009 10:33:30 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Repugnant_Conservative

The mail is specifically allowed for in the Constitution.


6 posted on 06/30/2009 10:34:25 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wrhssaxensemble; Texas Fossil

Thank you for the answers, but I’m *sure* if not from what document, that I read that it was forbidden, for the sake of the point of Texas Fossil’s reply. If anyone knows from where I came to read that, I would appreciate the reference.


7 posted on 06/30/2009 10:35:32 AM PDT by DGHoodini (The New York Times, are lying 'Rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The_Repugnant_Conservative

USPS existed long before those entities, and has allways been considered a function of Govt.


8 posted on 06/30/2009 10:36:56 AM PDT by DGHoodini (The New York Times, are lying 'Rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Repugnant_Conservative
If so wouldn’t UPS and FedEx have sued the Post Office?

I think the USPS is the only one allowed to carry first class mail, and UPS or FedEx couldn't if they wanted to. It's probably just as well, though, since there's probably not a lot of margin there anyway, if any.

9 posted on 06/30/2009 10:39:12 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

Well there is also always the 9th and 10th Amendments which are supposed to ensure that anything not specifically enumarated in the constitution are left to the states or the people themselves

the mail is in the constitution as is laws for bankruptcy, treaties, etc. but I think it is safe to say that the founders did not expect the federal government to become so large and powerful (even those who advocated a larger government like Hamilton) and socialism was a non-existent idea (didn’t come around, I think, until the 1830’s)


10 posted on 06/30/2009 10:39:57 AM PDT by wrhssaxensemble (Piyush "Bobby" Jindal in 2012 after Obama makes an even bigger mess of everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

Depends upon who is sitting on the supreme court


11 posted on 06/30/2009 10:44:56 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Repugnant_Conservative
If so wouldn’t UPS and FedEx have sued the Post Office?

The post office is specifically provided for as a power of Congress.

In other areas Congress has no delegated power to compete, or even operate, against private business.

There is no specifically delegate power for the government to compete with or be in business, and thus no need for a specific prohibition. But they put one in there any way, it's called the 10th amendment.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

For reference here are the delegated powers of Congress, and thus the federal government.:

Section. 8. The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; — And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

There are few other powers scattered about the Constitution, but none that give the government the power to build vehicles for the private market (they could build them for their own use), or operate banks. Most of the Constitution as originally written, concerns internal structural matters of the government itself. Only the Article I section 8 powers indicated above are "external". Later amendments concern themselves with rights and privileges, as well as internal matters, except for the 18th amendment, which was passed in 1919 and repealed in 1933 by the 21st amendment, and section 2 of the 21st, which prohibits importation of liquor into states where it is illegal. (Interesting that they felt the need to specifically include that, rather than just do it under the interstate commerce clause, as they now feel they can do)

12 posted on 06/30/2009 10:48:40 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini
USPS existed long before those entities, and has allways been considered a function of Govt.

Because there is a specific power granted to Congress "To establish Post Offices and post Roads", in article I section 8.

13 posted on 06/30/2009 10:50:58 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

As well as Constitutional provisions for the defense of the nation: DoD,FBI, Police etc..


14 posted on 06/30/2009 11:01:34 AM PDT by DGHoodini (The New York Times, are lying 'Rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini
The people are supposed to have the GOD GIVEN RIGHT to do most anything they want to within certain boundaries.

The Government may only perform the items enumerated within the Constitution.

This whole idea has been thrown out many decades ago and we have let the Government take control.

15 posted on 06/30/2009 11:28:19 AM PDT by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini
that the Govt is *forbidden*

The founders wrote the Constitution's grammar in a fashion that listed "powers granted". The founders did not write in a fashion that listed "powers forbidden".

The founders ratified the creation of a Constitution to establish a central government with only limited powers. Reading Article 1, Section 1, reveals the method the founder's selected to limit the government’s powers.

Article 1, Section 1, is clear when it said All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Without going into a lengthy explanation what this means is that if the Constitution does not list a specific “herein granted power” to government then the power does not exist.

Some like to read the Constitution and say that the government has the power to do something because the Constitution doesn’t say they can’t. In actuality, just the opposite is correct. If the Constitution doesn’t specifically say they can that means, they can’t.

The “Bill of Rights” did add prohibitions to the government’s powers. On examination, those prohibitions were not necessary because the Constitution had not granted the power to the government.

In summary, the government is “forbidden” from competing with public and private businesses because they do not have the “Powers herein granted”.

16 posted on 06/30/2009 11:33:38 AM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson