Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transformers: Worst-Reviewed $400 million hit?
AP ^ | June 29, 2009 | David Germain

Posted on 06/29/2009 4:47:48 AM PDT by Federalist Society

After just five days, "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" is halfway to $400 million domestically, a box-office milestone only eight other movies have reached. If it climbs that high, the "Transformers" sequel will be by far the worst-reviewed movie ever to make the $400 million club.

Critics and mainstream crowds often disagree, but "Revenge of the Fallen" sets a new standard for the gulf between what reviewers and mass audiences like.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: hollywood; moviereview; transformers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Federalist Society

Shows how much I know about Transformers, I thought Shia LaBeouf was a woman’s name.


21 posted on 06/29/2009 5:54:52 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Liberals are the world’s best at projecting, and apparently in this movie, the US President is a wuss, and SOME are taking this as a swipe at Obama. Permits therein lies the criticism.

I don't think it took a swipe at obama, I think it hit him dead center in his lying lips with an accurate assessment. President obama - named directly in the movie - is mentioned only as going to a "secure location." After that, the President takes no action, gives no orders. Once again, voting merely present on important issues.

22 posted on 06/29/2009 5:55:41 AM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar (I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom. You can keep the "change.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf

I thought the same thing. Pro-military (you will want to join the USAF after watching) and critical of soft diplomacy in the face of the obvious. There is more history/lore than the first installment, and a very famous aircraft transforms into one of the best characters. There is as much “questing” as there is “fighting” in this movie.

I did think it was about 1/2 hr too long and some of the robots have little or no introduction or speaking parts. The action, like the first movie, can be hard to follow at times. There is also more crude language so it warrants the PG-13 rating. But, if you liked the first one, go see this one. Don’t expect The Lord of the Rings, and you’ll be just fine.


23 posted on 06/29/2009 5:57:32 AM PDT by opticks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
I never pay attention to reviews.

That's one approach.

Another is to used the "professional" reviews in reverse. If they hate it, it's good. If they love it, it blows chunks. Not 100%, but darn close.

24 posted on 06/29/2009 6:01:16 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Society
"If you have seen this movie is it worth the price of admission?"

I can't imagine why the leftist critics didn't like it...just like the first one, the robot protaganist (Optimus Prime) is red white and blue. The plot centers on the struggle between the un-nuanced struggle between good and evil, with the US military being an unqualified force for good, even in the face of interference and threats from pencil necked bureaucrats. It even takes a shot at the self-righteousness of liberal academics with no real world experience and portrays cheating on a girlfriend as a particularly lousy thing to do.

I still can't figure out why liberal critics hate the movie ;-)

25 posted on 06/29/2009 6:01:31 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Society

If you like giant robots kicking the crap out of each other, then this is the movie for you. I thought it was a bit too long. The first one was a “tighter” flim, this one has a few loose ends. The special effects are beautiful and I love the fact that the US military is a strong, well represented force that plays for keeps. I thought the pencil neck government geek was made to look like Donald Rumsfeld.
I would give it 4 out of 5 stars, just because it is drawn out a bit too long.


26 posted on 06/29/2009 6:09:02 AM PDT by The Louiswu (I live vicariously, through myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Why would you go to a movie about giant, alien, battle transforming robots, to be concerned with the script?

LOL, I wasn't, but this, to me, was unusually bad. They even had an "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" moment that left me going "WTF?!?!?"

27 posted on 06/29/2009 6:18:44 AM PDT by Andonius_99 (There are two sides to every issue. One is right, the other is wrong; but the middle is always evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

We just look at the previews on tv or in the movies, and decide if we want to see it at the theater, on dvd or not.


28 posted on 06/29/2009 7:08:29 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Society

“If you have seen this movie is it worth the price of admission?”

Not in my opinion. I enjoyed the first one, for the most part. Fallen was crude and mind-numbingly boring. I actually fell asleep for a second or two. The positives - special effects, pro-military, and an Obama jab. However, it’s not for conservative family viewing.


29 posted on 06/29/2009 7:36:54 AM PDT by llmc1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Definately leave your mind at the door and enjoy the spectacle. I thought inferior to the first. My major complaints would be the bathroom humor which was not funny, the only thing realistic about the scenes at Princeton U was they actually filmed on the campus, and I was very disappointed unlike the first the soldiers were not given much quality screentime. A more creative screenwriter could of done a better job especially utilizing the Brit.


30 posted on 06/29/2009 8:16:39 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Society

According to my 17 year old son, who has seen it twice:

1. Megan Fox is smoking hot.
2. When Obama is diss’ed by name, the audience cheered (in purple-turning-blue New Mexico!)
3. He enjoyed it as much, if not more, than The Dark Knight.
4. Too much cursing.

It is on my “must see” list.


31 posted on 06/29/2009 11:03:44 AM PDT by Crusher138 ("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

That’s all I did, just enjoyed the film.


32 posted on 06/29/2009 12:41:32 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson