Posted on 06/25/2009 11:47:17 AM PDT by lewisglad
Photos of Maria Chapur from social networking site...more to come....
Je le frapperais quatre fois.
Sadly, statistics show they don't care. Some men (or women) leave and have very little or no relationship with their children any more. They have a new family elsewhere. Our culture is getting sicker every day.
“Maria Belenginer” = Maria Belen Giner
Yeah, she said he was too old for her but she didn’t decide this until he moved into her place. He was about 20 years older than she was. Isn’t that priceless? ;)
You asked — OK, before I head to Urban Dictionary, what does “not guilty” mean in a context like this?
—
Well, from what I’ve seen here, I think it’s a “FReeper thing”...
When you get these FReeper threads where a high school boy and his female teacher have a fling, FReepers say “Guilty” or “Not Guilty” in regards to the teacher and how good she looks... LOL...
If she’s as ugly as a dog, then she’s Guilty. If she’s a super-model type, then “Not Guilty”...
That’s the way it goes here, anyway.
Yikes!
Guilty, guilty, guilty.
I was a teenage girl once and did know what’s what.
I knew what guys were thinking. And most of the girls I knew did too.
Sex did cross my mind from time to time to time to time.
If you think otherwise you’d be shocked to know the truth.
She’s married also? I’m not saying she’s a fine human being, but IMO the governor is responsible for his own behavior. There are always going to be women digging a man like this and it’s up to him to find his priorities. How could this woman seduce him? She was in Argentina! I’m just saying - she didn’t wreck his marriage or career - he did.
She’s divorced.
So she didn't do any "behaving"--like boinking a man she knew was married?
Not blaming a whore for whoring is condescending to women in general. Is she without soul, so she can't lose one? Is she a child? Is she mentally handicapped?
Or is she vicious, selfish, and immoral, and culpable?
Do-over families. Women don't "do over" their families. That's something only men do.
I think this went way beyond “mid-life crisis.” It doesn’t take a psychologist to see that there are issues far beyond wanting to be with some woman (Sanford was already separated from his wife, and this wouldn’t have been a problem).
This was a career ending move, and I think that Rush was right. People see no future and are bailing before Bambi shuts it down so tight we can’t get out.
Clinton only toyed with Monica, he would never have knowingly taken the risks that Sanford took to see his little concubine, as Rush called her.
[... what translation are you using for Gen. 12.3? The word “Israel” isn’t there...]
I understand what you are trying to say and
appreciate your analysis. However, I do not
believe the “spirit” of my interpretation of
Genesis 12:3 is incorrect.
All of His Story, (past, present and future)
revolves around Israel. It behooves the
faithful to support her through prayer and
petition as they never stopped being God’s
chosen.
Too old....
:-)
Beg pardon....that would be olod......
From what I’ve read, she’s known about Maria for 5 months now....I would think she was possibly giving him every bit of opportunity to end the relationship, but he could not bring himself to do so, and that’s why she wanted him to leave. Who knows? Maybe she gave him an ultimatum...Maria or she and the boys; and wanted him to spend time away from them to decide which way it was going to be. I for one will not be surprised at all if the marriage doesn’t make it and that he ends up in Argentina with Maria after all.
Just think of us cougars as fine wine. We just get better with age. Go ahead and stick with your Boones Farm if you like...:P
No, I’m not saying she’s innocent. She’s totally responsible for her actions, just like Sanford is responsible for his. But I don’t think it’s right so say she’s to blame for the pain that his family is feeling or the demise of his career. He put those things at risk, not her.
You said — Jo, regarding your tag line, what translation are you using for Gen. 12.3? The word “Israel” isn’t there. God was speaking to Abram, and promised him: ...
—
Well, I have some experience in trying to fit something into a tagline, so I can comment (from experience, doncha know). On my tagline, I had to cut some words out and I could not quote Ann Coulter exactly as she said it... :-) ...). But, I tried...
Anyway..., it’s kinda hard to put a “commentary” into a “tagline”....
The God that is speaking to Abraham, is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (who was renamed “Israel”), and not the false god, “Allah”. And the blessings that were first spoken to Abraham were reaffirmed to Isaac and Jacob (the line of the promise), and they were not confirmed to Abraham and Ishmael...
I could go on from there, but, that’s sufficient. But, even that much — I’ll be darned if I can get that into a tagline...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.