Posted on 06/13/2009 8:59:19 AM PDT by JoeProBono
On 6 June at around 6pm a Mr Goa was driving through the Chinese city of Taiyuan near the Yi-Fen bridge when he saw a totally unexplainable object or UFO hovering in the sky above him. Mr Goa pulled up at the side of the road and observed the object for around 40minutes. He managed to take a number of photos (below) with his mobile phone.
Mr Goa noted that the object changed shape from a diamond to an orb and while it generally stayed in the same area it swung from side to side before shooting up into the sky. At one point Mr Goa alleges that the UFO had a faint halo. Mr Goa handed his pictures in to the local astronomy station. He believes he witnessed an extraterrestrial vehicle.
China generally has more reported UFO sightings than any other country on earth and it is believed that the Chinese Government takes a keen interest in the topic.
nully likes!
Could be a crappy camera...It’s always pointed at the sun in these pictures...He may have burned his CCD.
China! Be good or we'll use it on you!
*I hear the Muslims are pretty superstitous, too. Maybe we can use the threat of it on them.*
Actually it’s a flaw in the design then.
With audio processing, the solution is/was to cap the result at the maximum value and not let it be “truncated” or “wrapped”... the same should be done here.
THANKS.
UFO PING LIST “B” LIST PING.
Looks like a valid sighting and pics, to me.
The morphing bit has long been an interesting phenomenon . . . difficult to explain.
The belief that some Christians have that the craft are ‘nothing more’ than demons shaping themselves into various shaped craft might fit a few observations, comparatively. It doesn’t, imho, fit the majority of such sightings.
There’s too much other evidence that craft which have morphed have left tangible trace evidence which seems quite inconsistent, to me, with the craft=demonic beings 100%.
Of course, I do believe that the ‘pilots’ of such craft are in cahoots with satan toward setting up the world government just as demons are.
I agree with Guy Malone of
that demons were fallen angels who lost their bodies in Noah’s flood. Not all fallen angels did. It appears that 99.9% or more of the purported “ET’s” are fallen angels still with their bodies.
Anyway—it’s an interesting phenomenon with plenty of mystery and unknowns about it.
Thanks.
Given particular details of the China ren’s photos,
that explanation is thoroughly inadequate . . .
as usual.
Looks like that winged, orb thing that Harry Potter chases around on a broom, lol.
I’ve studied the antediluvian “Nephilim” phenomenon, via the Bible, various apocrypha/pseudoepigraphica, cultural myths and popular literature. So, I do have some level of familiarity.
I’ve seen many people claim that the fallen angels “lost their bodies” in the flood, but have not seen anything in my reading to support the claim that they were ever, literally incarnate. Their evil spawn, their “children,” were. Quite the number of these fallen ones, those who made an unholy pact with one another, were bound in the deepest depths of Sheol and are still there. But, there were “Nephilim” after the flood, so the possibility exists that either a few of them survived, or that the fallen, demons really, went back at it again.
So, what do you (and others) base this claim upon? What have I missed, did I misunderstand something, or ...?
Guy Malone and his sizeable group of experts are well represented on the DVD’s available at his website.
I don’t have all those details in my active memory.
They were convincing to me as I went through the many hours of presentations and testimony.
I forget which version of the BOOK OF ENOCH they referred to. But that was far from the only resource.
I don’t know that those details make a great deal of difference.
Whatever allegiance the critters have is the critical issue as St Paul asserted . . . if even an ‘angel from heaven’ preach any other Gospel, consider him accursed.
I’m not entirely hostile to the interpretation you’re espousing, Quix. I’ve just seen the “lost their bodies” reference several times, and did not gain that understanding myself, from my readings.
I’m also not all that familiar with this Guy Malone, but the book that is widely accepted as being authentic, referenced in the Bible by John and by Jesus Christ, came to us by way of Ethiopia, and has been validated by numerous scroll finds. Hence, it’s known as the Ethiopic Book Of Enoch, or 1 Enoch. The other, known as the Slavonic, or 2 Enoch, is highly controversial and viewed as a fraud from the middle ages by many.
I think it’s overloaded pixels in the CCD camera. The guy is taking picture of the sun and the CCD cannot handle it.
I think I understand about those two Enoch’s.
Isn’t there a preferred translation of the Ethiopian book of Enoch?
I’m really terrible about it—like I am names, ages, birthdays . . . Sheesh. I need to put it in a file where I can easily find it again! LOL. Maybe at the end of my END TIMES ping list.
That does not at all explain various features of the image.
Not at all.
The favored one is the first. In English, that is. It was apparently translated out of the original Aramaic into Greek and Latin early on, then fell into obscurity until Richard Laurence translated the Ethiopic texts in 1821.
Which is considered the most Biblical; the most referred to in the Bible?
On the contrary, there are many clues in the photos that indicate artifacting due to inability of the camera's CCD to render the image properly because of overload. One of the most telling is the lens flare duplicates the solar disk visible but does not show the black object. If the black object were real, the flare reflection would also image it as a black object surrounded by bright light. The demonstrates that the CCD is capable of rendering the dimmer lens flare but fails on the direct image. The upper left telephoto image shows artifacting of pixelization in the wings to the left and right of the black disk where the CCDs cells are beginning to fail to respond. I could duplicate this image if I wanted to risk my digital camera. I don't care to put it at risk.
Richard Kimball, I recall you are a professional photographer. What do you think?
I wouldn’t call either of them “Biblical” per se, since they’re not Canonical. The references in the Bible that are clearly from Enoch can be found in 1 Enoch.
THANKS.
Thanks for your kind replies.
UFO LIST . . . here’s a very interesting video—shows what many folks over many years and many locations describe seeing.
However, the first 5/7ths of the video are uninteresting. The last several seconds are what’s interesting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPI5SbQPr1Y&eurl
I gather folks at ATS are crying CGI . . .
however, they seem to cry CGI at everything. Nothing ever satisfies them.
Here’s another interesting with slow motion of the critical blink out at the end.
Even if these are CGI . . . which I’m no expert on . . .
they STILL illustrate what many people have seen thousands of times.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-_OH6nu7V8
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.