Posted on 05/07/2009 4:34:34 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
On his first day in office, January 21, 2009, Obama signed Executive Order 13489. This order was entered into the Federal Register on January 26, 2009.
What this executive order says, is that only the Attorney General (Eric Holder) and Council to the President, (Gregory Craig) are able to review presidential records requests and determine if they can be made public or not. (See Section 3)
In other words, you aren't going to see any records or documents that Obama doesn't want you to see.
It shouldn't surprise anyone that Obama's first official act was to deny access to his records. Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints -- none! There is no Obama documentation -- no bona fides -- no paper trail -- nothing.
Original, vault copy birth certificate -- Not released
Certificate of Live Birth -- Released -- Counterfeit Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released
Obama/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators)
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released
Soetoro adoption records -- Not released
Soetoro/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators)
Fransiskus Assisi School School application -- Released (by independent investigators)
Punahou School records -- Not released
Selective Service Registration -- Released -- Counterfeit
Occidental College records -- Not released
Passport -- Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama's terrorism and intelligence adviser.
Columbia College records -- Not released Columbia thesis -- Not released
Harvard College records -- Not released
Harvard Law Review articles -- None
Baptism certificate -- None
Medical records -- Not released
Illinois State Senate records -- None
Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost
Law practice client list -- Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None
Go ahead, tell me that this is just a coincidence
Transparency BTTT
Executive Order 13489
What? No baptism? From this deeply Christian guy? What a shock....
"THIS JUST IN - The Obama administration has set up an education camp
for anyone asking any question about his credentials."
Adding this fact to the list of missing documents:
Noelani Elementary School Kindergarten records from State of Hawaii Dept. of Education - Missing
This is an important feature because K-records for original school entry would have contained the following:
1. His REAL Birth Certificate
2. An application with the following:
1.. His Legal name.
2.. Parents or Legal Guardians names.
3. Date of Birth
4. Place of Birth
5. Vaccination Records (revealing a timeline to the place and DOB.)
It also is important for two reasons:
A. The Dept.of Education does not lose the records of one particular student. So,...Who paid whom what sum to make this record disappear?)
B. There would have been NO shameful low-test scores, NO embarassing Equal Opportunity advancements, and NO trails of fraudulent funding to hide which could possibly excuse the quashing of public school Kindergarten entry records.
For the rest of his life he attended very expensive private schools and has had his records legally sealed to deny the public, his true life story.
This is different. Hawaii should be able to verify he attended their school since he is featured in class photographs. State and federal tax dollars paid for his initial year of education. Why is there no documentation?
This is the tip of the iceberg of an intentionally erased life and it reeks of complicity by officials within the State of Hawaiis Dept. of Health & Dept of Education.
This defeats the concept of checks and balances - the executive branch shouldn’t have the power to monitor itself. Could someone “with standing” challenge this?
b. Free from guile; candid or open: transparent sincerity.
He has dictionary issues too.
Fraud, and violation of Constitutional law, upon the American people, is a basis for impeachment and trial of a sitting president. And he wants to charge attorneys for waterboarding? Let the games begin.
Obama Bars Access To His Records
A marxist quisling and the GOP roll over and play dead. Shameful
But they groveled and sold out every American, and their Oaths.
Ex parte SCOTUS, led by the Constitutional-traitor John Roberts, unethically meets with a single litigant
in the most imporant case before them in their entire lives. Code of Professional Ethics? John Jay? Forgetaboutit.
SCOTUS could easily overrule this... but they obviously wont... because they apparently care no more for the constitution they swore to uphold than he does.
Unless I’m reading the EO wrong, there is a difference between PRESIDENTIAL records and PRIVATE records of PRESIDENTS.
Can someone elaborate?
In all honesty, SCOTUS has always refused to hear these claims on separation of powers grounds. Congress should be investigating this.
Congress should be investigating this.
::::::::::
LMFAO!!! That is like putting a vampire in charge of a blood bank!!! -—
I am distrustful of Obama too, but I really think this EO deals with PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS.
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the
laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies
and procedures governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent
and former Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records
by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant
to the Presidential Records Act of 1978,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.