[ElayneJ]

This defeats the concept of checks and balances - the executive branch shouldn’t have the power to monitor itself. Could someone “with standing” challenge this?

[Diogenesis]

Presumably the checks and balances were SCOTUS.

But they groveled and sold out every American, and their Oaths.

Ex parte SCOTUS, led by the Constitutional-traitor John Roberts, unethically meets with a single litigant
in the most imporant case before them in their entire lives. Code of Professional Ethics? John Jay? Forgetaboutit.