Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mac OS X worm: time to get worried?
ITWire ^ | Wednesday, 06 May 2009 | by Stephen Withers

Posted on 05/06/2009 12:49:42 AM PDT by Swordmaker

Symantec says a new worm targeting Mac OS X spreads via email and network shares. But is it really a threat?

According to Symantec, the Tored worm spreads through network shares and by emailing itself to addresses gathered from the infected computer's Address Book.

It opens a back door to the computer, allowing it to be conscripted into distributed denial of service attacks as well as logging keystrokes (which could be used to steal passwords and other confidential information).

There is no indication that Tored can execute without user intervention. For example, Symantec does not seem to suggest that there are any issues with Mac OS X mail clients that could cause the code to be automatically executed when the message is opened.

The company says there are a very small number of Tored infections at no more than two sites, and that the worm is easily contained and removed, and does little damage.

Tored has been given a risk level of 1, the lowest on Symantec's scale.

But was Tored really discovered on May 5, as Symantec claims?

Not if it is the same Tored that Intego reported last week as being discovered on April 22.

According to Intego, Tored is a proof-of-concept created with RealBasic, which is not the malware writers' usual tool of choice.

Intego says the malware works by copying itself into the System and System/Library/StartupItems folders so it runs automatically after subsequent logins.

Tored attempts to spread using "an SMTP server that is currently non-existent" so that doesn't get it very far. Furthermore, "the code in this malware is faulty, and it does not work correctly, so there is no real threat from this malware."

So it would seem that the usual precautions (not blindly opening every attachment that arrives by email, or every file that appears in shared folders) would suffice, and even if you are careless there may not be any real harm done.

Sophos added Tored detection to its antivirus products last weekend. Senior technology consultant Graham Cluely described it as "a lame email worm" and said "Bugs in the worm's code, however, mean it is unlikely that you will ever encounter it, even if the author had taken the time to correct the many spelling mistakes in the emails it tries to send. So don't lose too much sleep."

"For now, I think a much more real threat for Apple fanatics is that of websites hosting malicious applications designed to undermine their Mac's security," he added, in a reference to the RSPlug malware.

But bugs can be fixed, and mail servers put into action. So to borrow a slogan, it's time to be alert, not alarmed.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: apple; bestcomputer; fud; hackers; maccult; machasnoviruses; macintosh; macvirus; spamiswindows; viruses
It actually sounds like the trojan that was included in the pirated download of iWork'09 on a couple of bit-torrent sites that was later confabulated with no evidence by two Symantec workers in a non-Symantec article as having infected 20,000 Macs and then, in concert, jointly performing a Denial of Service attack on an unnamed website... again without proof. It basically worked the same way by copying itself—which included a key-logger— into the startup folder in the System Library (with the active help of an idiot with an administrator password).

Since the so-called worm in this article wants to use an non-existing SMTP server, I cannot see how it can be called a worm. It will never send copies of itself to anyone.

1 posted on 05/06/2009 12:49:42 AM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

2 posted on 05/06/2009 12:53:03 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; 50mm; 6SJ7; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; Aliska; aristotleman; ...
Ho Hum... another proof-of-concept OS X worm that doesn't work. PING!


Mac Security with a FUD headline Ping!

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

3 posted on 05/06/2009 12:53:18 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I like it... can I rip it off?


4 posted on 05/06/2009 12:54:25 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Ho-hum. Another “But Macs really, really do have viruses and stuff, just like windows d00d, so they are not awesome, man, and cost more than my clone box, and don’t have games, d00d” story.

This is like the MSM reporting on Bush Derangement Syndrome every month or so.

There is no virus, trojan, or worm that is a threat to MacOS.


5 posted on 05/06/2009 12:54:58 AM PDT by lefty-lie-spy (Stay metal. For the Horde \m/("_")\m/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lefty-lie-spy
There is no virus, trojan, or worm that is a threat to MacOS.

I agree there are no viruses or worms... but there are about 15 Trojan horse programs. No operating system that allows you to install software can protect the system against an administrator installing an malicious applications.

6 posted on 05/06/2009 1:03:27 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Sure. ‘Su Casa es Mi Casa’


7 posted on 05/06/2009 1:05:21 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Sure. ‘Su Casa es Mi Casa’


8 posted on 05/06/2009 1:05:22 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Thanks, Joe.


9 posted on 05/06/2009 1:13:46 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
So it would seem that the usual precautions (not blindly opening every attachment that arrives by email, or every file that appears in shared folders) would suffice, and even if you are careless there may not be any real harm done.

from the sound of things, it's not even just a matter of opening attachments to email. After opening it, you apparently then have to actively give it permission to run, and then give it your administrator password. Sounds kinda not-to-bright to me.

10 posted on 05/06/2009 6:57:02 AM PDT by zeugma (Will it be nukes or aliens? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

A “worm” that not only requires you open an unrecognized file attached to an email, then have to give permission to install, then enter administrator password - for a bit of code that doesn’t even work.

Hmmm... crickets still chirping...


11 posted on 05/06/2009 7:34:10 AM PDT by TheBattman (Pray for our country...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

You just described every worm that can infect an up2date version of Vista.


12 posted on 05/06/2009 10:09:58 AM PDT by DevNet (What's past is prologue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DevNet; TheBattman
You just described every worm that can infect an up2date version of Vista.

The crickets can do a duet...

13 posted on 05/06/2009 12:00:26 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson