Posted on 05/05/2009 11:39:43 AM PDT by lewisglad
Following her edgy (and obscenity filled) tribute to Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts continues to reveal her wild side.
Spotted Monday on vacation in Hawaii with husband Danny Moder and their three kids, cameras caught a new tattoo peeking out of the Oscar winner's green bikini.
Situated on the small of her back, the tat consists of the names of her little ones surrounding an illustration.
Four-year-old twins Phinnaeus and Hazel's names are side by side rounding her backside, while just above them is Henry, nearly 2.
Roberts is next slated to appear in the movie adaptation of the best-selling Eat, Pray, Love.
(Excerpt) Read more at radaronline.com ...
At least they are kind enough to advertise with bare midriffs, etc.
It’d be a shame to learn after you’d already brought her home.
Not to get too ripe here, but you’re a guy, you glance down, and get a solid reminder that this could result in child support. Creepy creepy creepy.
Small of the back? That’s ass crack.
Maybe it shifted?
The casting director for Pretty Woman nailed it when he/she selected Julia Roberts to play the role of a prostitute. No training/research was required on JR’s part.
If it saves just one guy from being the father of Julia Roberts’ child, it is totally worth it.
Is one of her kids name “Fatass”?
Ew. I’m all for tats, but on her, who I loathe anyway, she looks like trash.
Guilty
I would be so proud knowing my mom hade our names tatooed on the crack of her ass........Classy Mom
OK! Have you seen and heard Demi Moore lately? She has had so much plastic done to her face she is a mere shadow of what she once looked and sounded like.
Furthermore, we are seeing a photo of Julia Roberts totally not airbrushed.
Julie looks more than just fine and she's still a natural beauty.
sw
Maybe that’s what she determined would be the best contraception for her and the husband.
To hear some of these guys talk, you’d think they were all 6’2” and built. I’m sure the reality is vastly divergent.
I think Julia looks fine, too. The midsection has lost some tone, but I guess it happens if you have kids. I’m surprised that with 3 young children, her arms are not in better shape. And her taste in bathing suits is appalling, to me. But I agree that she looks just fine.
To hear some of these guys talk, you’d think they were all 6’2” and built. I’m sure the reality is vastly divergent.
I think Julia looks fine, too. The midsection has lost some tone, but I guess it happens if you have kids. I’m surprised that with 3 young children, her arms are not in better shape. And her taste in bathing suits is appalling, to me. But I agree that she looks just fine.
Good point...... her kids names made into a slutoo
To hear some of these guys talk, youd think they were all 62 and built. Im sure the reality is vastly divergent.
I think Julia looks fine, too. The midsection has lost some tone, but I guess it happens if you have kids. Im surprised that with 3 young children, her arms are not in better shape. And her taste in bathing suits is appalling, to me. But I agree that she looks just fine.
oops....there she goes. Alrighty then, a bulls-eye stamp.
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/06_02/RobertsModer2X17_468x545.jpg
http://www.celebritybabyscoop.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/modertwins.jpg
http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2008/cbb/galleries/baby_workout/danny_moder.jpg
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.