Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Jessica Parker, Matthew Broderick Expecting Twins
fox news ^ | Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Posted on 04/28/2009 7:22:52 PM PDT by Perdogg

Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick are expecting twin girls via a surrogate, Entertainment Weekly reports.

Both Parker and Broderick's reps confirmed the news.

A friend of the couple told Entertainment Weekly that they have been trying to expand their family since the birth of their 6-year-old son James, but had been unsuccessful.

"They came to the conclusion that this was going to be the best alternative for expanding their family," the friend told Entertainment Weekly.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: hollyweirdshill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 04/28/2009 7:22:52 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lainie; PennsylvaniaMom; Extremely Extreme Extremist; Tax-chick; TexasCajun; sarasota; ...

ping


2 posted on 04/28/2009 7:23:24 PM PDT by Perdogg (University of North Carolina - 2009 NCAA basketball champs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick are expecting twin girls via a surrogate, Entertainment Weekly reports.

Nathan Lane is pregnant?

3 posted on 04/28/2009 7:24:25 PM PDT by Dahoser (The missus and I joined the NRA. Who says Obama can't inspire conservatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I wonder who the father is.


4 posted on 04/28/2009 7:24:47 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

She has got to be one of the uglier sex symbols.


5 posted on 04/28/2009 7:24:57 PM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser

[Nathan Lane is pregnant? ]

That’s even better. I was going to ask how Matthew pulled this off?


6 posted on 04/28/2009 7:26:27 PM PDT by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: exist

She was cute back in 1991.


7 posted on 04/28/2009 7:26:45 PM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Great. More kids with disfiguring moles on their faces, LOL!

Just kidding. I do NOT understand the attractiveness of this woman. Her husband is ‘cute’ but geeze; who wants a ‘cute’ 50-year old?

Seriously. This woman has gotten WAY too much mileage out of a stint on Broadway when she was a kid!


8 posted on 04/28/2009 7:27:25 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote; Perdogg
The Surrogate MILF:


9 posted on 04/28/2009 7:28:10 PM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

They used a surrogate. Looks like Miss Sex in The City didn’t want to ruin her figure but wanted to put a stop to the rumors about the state of her marriage. Mr. Broderick just wanted to get Miss Sex In The City off his back so he said okay.


10 posted on 04/28/2009 7:28:57 PM PDT by Dinah Lord (fighting the Islamofascist Jihad - one keystroke at a time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

This is very odd news.


11 posted on 04/28/2009 7:30:07 PM PDT by Radix (We seek Liberty......They give us Debt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

actually in the movie with Matt Mcconaghy and zooey deschanel she didn’t look that bad.


12 posted on 04/28/2009 7:30:10 PM PDT by Perdogg (University of North Carolina - 2009 NCAA basketball champs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Poor ugly babies!


13 posted on 04/28/2009 7:34:04 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Great, two more future Libs.


14 posted on 04/28/2009 7:34:25 PM PDT by EAGLE7 (They make take our lives but they'll never take our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser; driftdiver; Perdogg

Well first I was gonna say something snarky about Nathan Lane loosing his boyish figure; then I was going to be really bitc#y and ask if Mr. Big was the father; now I am going to have to tax my poor little celeb obcessed brain...
to top you guys...

Thinking...

Cynthia Nixon couldn’t find an acting gig?

Sigh. Not funny. I know. That’s what I get for getting to a thread late...


15 posted on 04/28/2009 7:35:07 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (M. Thatcher, "The trouble with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Wasn’t he busted for cheating on her a few months back?


16 posted on 04/28/2009 7:38:14 PM PDT by Lizavetta (Politicians: When they're not lying, they're stealing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Well hell, give Matt a break. It’s hard to get a gal pregnant when you have to look at a naked Sarah Jessica Parker.


17 posted on 04/28/2009 7:40:50 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom

I heard Cynthia got a gig for some carpet place...


18 posted on 04/28/2009 7:41:31 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom

Mancow says ‘that woman looks like a foot!’

Thanks all for not ruining this thread with a pic


19 posted on 04/28/2009 7:44:32 PM PDT by DC Packfan (Hi, I'm Jimmah, and I'm a dumbass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Aren’t they getting divorced?


20 posted on 04/28/2009 7:44:37 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (The McCain/Palin ticket was like a Kangaroo, stronger on the bottom than at the top)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson