1 posted on
04/28/2009 7:22:52 PM PDT by
Perdogg
To: lainie; PennsylvaniaMom; Extremely Extreme Extremist; Tax-chick; TexasCajun; sarasota; ...
2 posted on
04/28/2009 7:23:24 PM PDT by
Perdogg
(University of North Carolina - 2009 NCAA basketball champs)
To: Perdogg
Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick are expecting twin girls via a surrogate, Entertainment Weekly reports. Nathan Lane is pregnant?
3 posted on
04/28/2009 7:24:25 PM PDT by
Dahoser
(The missus and I joined the NRA. Who says Obama can't inspire conservatives?)
To: Perdogg
I wonder who the father is.
4 posted on
04/28/2009 7:24:47 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Perdogg
She has got to be one of the uglier sex symbols.
5 posted on
04/28/2009 7:24:57 PM PDT by
exist
To: Perdogg
Great. More kids with disfiguring moles on their faces, LOL!
Just kidding. I do NOT understand the attractiveness of this woman. Her husband is ‘cute’ but geeze; who wants a ‘cute’ 50-year old?
Seriously. This woman has gotten WAY too much mileage out of a stint on Broadway when she was a kid!
8 posted on
04/28/2009 7:27:25 PM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: Perdogg
11 posted on
04/28/2009 7:30:07 PM PDT by
Radix
(We seek Liberty......They give us Debt.)
To: Perdogg
To: Perdogg
Great, two more future Libs.
14 posted on
04/28/2009 7:34:25 PM PDT by
EAGLE7
(They make take our lives but they'll never take our freedom!)
To: Perdogg
Wasn’t he busted for cheating on her a few months back?
16 posted on
04/28/2009 7:38:14 PM PDT by
Lizavetta
(Politicians: When they're not lying, they're stealing.)
To: Perdogg
Well hell, give Matt a break. It’s hard to get a gal pregnant when you have to look at a naked Sarah Jessica Parker.
17 posted on
04/28/2009 7:40:50 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Perdogg
Aren’t they getting divorced?
20 posted on
04/28/2009 7:44:37 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(The McCain/Palin ticket was like a Kangaroo, stronger on the bottom than at the top)
To: Perdogg
This might start a craze. Hollywood stars using surrogates so they can keep working and not have a pregnancy interfere with their acting jobs.
I know she might have legitimate medical reasons, but it still might start a craze.
To: Perdogg
Matthew must have found a extra grocery bag.
To: Perdogg
36 posted on
04/28/2009 10:37:53 PM PDT by
celtic gal
(I think the democRATs should change their logo from a jackass to a RAT with a long tail.)
To: Perdogg
That’s great news, Sarah! Why the long face?
43 posted on
04/29/2009 4:53:37 AM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Perdogg
TTIWWOPoh
This thread is worthless without pictures of horses
44 posted on
04/29/2009 4:58:26 AM PDT by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar!)
To: Perdogg
Awww, two foals, how nice.
46 posted on
04/29/2009 7:03:35 AM PDT by
Malsua
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson