AIG was responsible for the banks January and February profitability

Zero Hedge blog ^ | March 29, 2009 | Tyler Durden

[oldtimer2]

Exclusive:

AIG Was Responsible For The Banks' January & February Profitability

Posted by Tyler Durden at 6:35 PM

Zero Hedge is rarely speechless, but after receiving this email from a correlation desk trader, we simply had to hold a moment of silence for the phenomenal scam that continues unabated in the financial markets, and now has the full oversight and blessing of the U.S. government, which in turns keeps on duping U.S. taxpayers into believing everything is good.

I present the insider perspective of trader Lou (who wishes to remain anonymous) in its entirety:

"AIG-FP accumulated thousands of trades over the years, all essentially consisted of selling default protection. This was done via a number of structures with really only one criteria - rated at least AA- (if it fit these criteria all OK - as far as I could tell credit assessment was completely outsourced to the rating agencies).

Main products they took on were always levered credit risk, credit-linked notes (collateral and CDS both had to be at least AA-, no joint probability stuff) and AAA or super senior portfolio swaps. Portfolio swaps were either corporate synthetic CDO or asset backed, effectively sub-prime wraps (as per news stories regarding GS and DB).

Credit linked notes are done through single-name CDS desks and a cash desk (for the note collateral) and the portfolio swaps are done through the correlation desk. These trades were done is almost every jurisdiction - wherever AIG had an office they had IB salespeople covering them.

Correlation desks just back their risk out via the single names desks - the correlation desk manages the delta/gamma according to their correlation model. So correlation desks carry model risk but very little market risk.

I was mostly involved in the corporate synthetic CDO side.

During Jan/Feb AIG would call up and just ask for complete unwind prices from the credit desk in the relevant jurisdiction. These were not single deal unwinds as are typically more price transparent - these were whole portfolio unwinds. The size of these unwinds were enormous, the quotes I have heard were "we have never done as big or as profitable trades - ever".

As these trades are unwound, the correlation desk needs to unwind the single name risk through the single name desks - effectively the AIG-FP unwinds caused massive single name protection buying. This caused single name credit to massively underperform equities - run a chart from say last September to current of say S&P 500 and Itraxx - credit has underperformed massively. This is largely due to AIG-FP unwinds.

I can only guess/extrapolate what sort of PnL this put into the major global banks (both correlation and single names desks) during this period. Allowing for significant reserve release and trade PnL, I think for the big correlation players this could have easily been US$1-2bn per bank in this period."

For those to whom this is merely a lot of mumbo-jumbo, let me explain in layman's terms: AIG, knowing it would need to ask for much more capital from the Treasury imminently, decided to throw in the towel, and gifted major bank counter-parties with trades which were egregiously profitable to the banks, and even more egregiously money losing to the U.S. taxpayers, who had to dump more and more cash into AIG, without having the U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner disclose the real extent of this, for lack of a better word, fraudulent scam.

In simple terms think of it as an auto dealer, which knows that U.S. taxpayers will provide for an infinite amount of money to fund its ongoing sales of horrendous vehicles (think Pontiac Azteks): the company decides to sell all the cars currently in contract, to lessors at far below the amortized market value, thereby generating huge profits for these lessors, as these turn around and sell the cars at a major profit, funded exclusively by U.S. taxpayers (readers should feel free to provide more gripping allegories).

What this all means is that the statements by major banks, i.e. JPM, Citi, and BofA, regarding abnormal profitability in January and February were true, however these profits were a) one-time in nature due to wholesale unwinds of AIG portfolios, b) entirely at the expense of AIG, and thus taxpayers, c) executed with Tim Geithner's (and thus the administration's) full knowledge and intent, d) were basically a transfer of money from taxpayers to banks (in yet another form) using AIG as an intermediary.

For banks to proclaim their profitability in January and February is about as close to criminal hypocrisy as is possible. And again, the taxpayers fund this "one time profit", which causes a market rally, thus allowing the banks to promptly turn around and start selling more expensive equity (soon coming to a prospectus near you), also funded by taxpayers' money flows into the market. If the administration is truly aware of all these events (and if Zero Hedge knows about it, it is safe to say Tim Geithner also got the memo), then the potential fallout would be staggering once this information makes the light of day.

And the conspiracy thickens.

Thanks to an intrepid reader who pointed this out, a month ago ISDA published an amended close out protocol. This protocol would allow non-market close outs, i.e. CDS trade crosses that were not alligned with market bid/offers.

The purpose of the Protocol is to permit parties to agree upfront that in the event of a counterparty default, they will use Close-Out Amount valuation methodology to value trades. Close-Out Amount valuation, which was introduced in the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement, differs from the Market Quotation approach in that it allows participants more flexibility in valuation where market quotations may be difficult to obtain. Of course ISDA made it seems that it was doing a favor to industry participants, very likely dictating under the gun:

Industry participants observed the significant benefits of the Close-Out Amount approach following the default of Lehman Brothers. In launching the Close-Out Amount Protocol, ISDA is facilitating amendment of existing 1992 ISDA Master Agreements by replacing Market Quotation and, if elected, Loss with the Close-Out Amount approach.

"This is yet another example of ISDA helping the industry to coalesce around more efficient and effective practices, while maintaining flexibility," said Robert Pickel, Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer, ISDA. "The Protocol permits parties to value trades in the way that is most appropriate, which greatly enhances smooth functioning of the market in testing circumstances."

And, lo and behold, on the list of adhering parties, AIG takes front and center stage (together with several other parties that probably deserve the microscope treatment).

This wholesale manipulation of markets, investors and taxpayers has gone on long enough

[Travis McGee]

I don’t believe it’s true. JDM went in for “routine” bypass surgery, with the complete expectation of many more years ahead of him. But he was one of that unlucky % the consent form warns you about.

A shame. I’d love to get his take on today’s world. He was a very wise man.

[Travis McGee]

PS, he had not stopped writing. He had pretty much wound up T. McGee’s character with “The Lonely Silver Rain,” where he discovers and reconciles with an unknownd daughter, the offspring of an old girlfriend who had died. JDM was increasingly moving away from TM, with more and more years between TM novels. The fictional salvage expert was too long in the tooth, thought JDM, for bare knuckle brawling and womanizing on the Busted Flush. The Lonely Silver Rain was TM’s swan song, but not the end of JDM’s writing. He wrote three times as many non-TM novels as TM novels, and was going to continue at that writing.

[Betis70]

Ping, not sure what all this means (pretty high on the jargon-o-meter), but it sure sounds like AIG is being used as the Gov’t to Bank laundering scheme.

[pointsal]

How about water-boarding these scheming rascals?
When will the truth come out?

[ken21]

wow!

just in time to inflate the el presidente.

[nyconse]

Very true...what have they done but pay foreign banks 100% while stiffing Countrywide and other American companies...they are scum...at AIG.

[dennisw]

Doom n gloom ping list

[dennisw]

Thank you for posting this oldtimer2, I was wondering how AIG-FP was unwinding their portfolio, and suspected that it was not on the best of terms; per AIG's 2008 10-K AIG-FP lost $41 BILLION dollars. I will be fun to read the Q1 10-Q. The 400 plus AIG-FP employees have been paid about $500,000 each (on average) in bonuses, which led to the recent hue and cry, and attempts to tax away these bonuses.

Goldman Sacks just got 13 billion for AIG swaps
Goldman is claiming they were fully hedged on those swaps
Then why was Goldman Sachs given even one thin dime?

Paulson and Tim Guithner are/were hard wired into these decisions and gave away these billions to their crony capitalist friends. We have a crony capitalist oligarchy just like Russia, Philippines, Indonesia and other crappy 3rd world nations

've been wondering whether or not is was really necessary to pay these guys (the guys who caused AIG's September liquidity crisis) this much money to unwind the book and I wondered how good a job they were doing; and the answer seems to be, not a very good job.

For months the rumor was that Goldman was a major beneficary of AIG bailouts. This rumor turns out to be true

In the AIG bonus scandal threads most posters here seemed think that these guys were being unfairly picked upon, that they were Ayn Rand heroes, (Ayn Rand heroes who made 66% of their political contributions to Democrats in the last election cycle)

Hank Reardon was in industrialist! He made useful tangible items. He was not a parasite which is what our financial sector has morphed into. As parasitical as the bloated Federal Gov't in DC

******  Hank Reardon is Ayn Rand's hero in Atlas Shrugged

[dennisw]

Zero hedge is a good website