The author has given permission for his rant to be used in its entirety for non-commercial purposes. I have made changes to remove a few f-bombs; the original is at the source link.
If other folks in the financial sector feel the same way this guy does, BHO has truly damaged the US economy.
1 posted on
03/22/2009 7:42:24 PM PDT by
gieriscm
To: gieriscm
“...BHO has truly damaged the US economy. “
Really? Is there any QUESTION from ANY quarter that he’s not mucking it up big time.
BUMP! Nice rant. I’ll re-read it over morning coffee. Thanks. :)
2 posted on
03/22/2009 7:52:29 PM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: gieriscm
Unfortunately, a bunch of people in the Financial sector GAVE MONEY TO THE PEOPLE THEY NOW ARE PISSED OFF AT.
So after a bunch of liberal bankers gave the rest of us this complete a$$ f**king, they’re all going to leave?????????????
NEW YORK IS A BLUE STATE.
I don’t know who to be more mad at: our Congress or their rich enablers. :(
3 posted on
03/22/2009 7:57:54 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
(http://groups.myspace.com/nailthemessiah)
To: gieriscm
These guys need to form a union, then they will be golden. I really wish they would buy 30 minutes of prime time to explain this to the sheeple. Throw it right back where it belongs...the cesspool in D.C.
4 posted on
03/22/2009 8:00:48 PM PDT by
trtdenver
To: gieriscm
5 posted on
03/22/2009 8:08:43 PM PDT by
kanawa
To: gieriscm
6 posted on
03/22/2009 8:09:01 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(01-20-2009 : The end of the PAX AMERICANA.)
To: gieriscm
Thanks for this post. Going to read it tomorrow.
8 posted on
03/22/2009 8:21:11 PM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(What did Obama's Teleprompter know, and when did it know it...)
To: gieriscm
Greetings gieriscm:
Awesome! Post of the year?
Cheers,
OLA
To: gieriscm
UBS, with the support of the Swiss Government, is offering 10 year permits to execs and their families who relocate to Switzerland, not to mention the ability to negotiate your personal tax rate for the next 10 years up front in some Cantons. That's a great deal - the kind of thing we ought to be doing. But who (other than net benefit recipients) wants to relocate to the USA under this kind of President, who is only a step or two less Marxist than Hugo Chavez?
10 posted on
03/22/2009 8:42:50 PM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
("If you cannot pick it up and run with it, you don't really own it." -- Robert Heinlein)
To: gieriscm
Starting back in the 1970s Congress addressed discrimination in mortgage lending (which was really a serious problem)...BS - it's not now and never has been "discrimination" to deny loans to those who are at high risk of not repaying them - and this includes those who are "poor", "unemployed", and "uneducated" - it's simply the way the system should work without interference from the do-gooders who've brought the system down.....
To: Tempest; bruinbirdman; PzLdr; VeniVidiVici; nathanbedford; bray; raybbr; neverdem; SunkenCiv; ...
*PING* to an EXCELLENT rant.
Cheers!
12 posted on
03/22/2009 9:27:44 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: gieriscm
uhhh don’t take government money and cry?
13 posted on
03/22/2009 9:34:39 PM PDT by
Tempest
(The Republican party, racing to lose 2010)
To: gieriscm
Congress addressed discrimination in mortgage lending (which was really a serious problem)Um, no.
It was said to be a serious problem. And then the Boston Fed did a landmark statistical study which purported to support the accusations of discrimination.
And based on that study, the social engineers decided that financial institutions should make loans regardless of sound credit standards, in order that more minorities could get expensive mortgages.
But it turns out the Boston Fed study used invalid statistical methods to arrive at its conclusion. Using valid methods, no discrimination was shown. See: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5814/is_n1_v36/ai_n28704420 "A re-examination of their preferred statistical approach leads to the simple conclusion that no evidence for discrimination exists in these mortgage markets when all of the relevant variables are included."
When the flawed methodology was discovered, it was ignored. The social engineers had already achieved the power they wanted.
To: SeaDragon; TheGrimReaper
26 posted on
03/23/2009 9:53:29 AM PDT by
RikaStrom
(Bitter? Who me? Nah, I'm just clinging to my guns!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson