Posted on 03/03/2009 6:56:01 AM PST by BGHater
One of the pillars of German industry, the giant but debt-crippled Schaeffler car parts supplier, was accused yesterday of using hair shorn from at least 40,000 Auschwitz death camp prisoners to make textiles at its factories in Nazi-occupied Poland during the Second World War.
The highly disturbing allegations were contained in new evidence unearthed by Polish historians at the Auschwitz museum, who said they had found rolls of fabric made from camp inmates' hair at a former Schaeffler factory in Poland's southern region of Silesia.
The discovery was the latest in a series of damaging blows for the ailing Schaeffler concern, which employs 200,000 people worldwide. The company is currently saddled with debts totalling €14bn (£12.6bn) and faces the prospect of bankruptcy.
Last month, Maria-Elisabeth Schaeffler, the concern's flamboyant and usually fur-coated millionaire owner, appeared at a trade union rally and wept openly as she appealed to the government of the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, for a state-funded bailout. In an attempt to clear up rumours about the company's wartime role, Mrs Schaeffler recently admitted to using slave labourers at its factories during the Second World War. However, the company's officially published history still only begins in 1946.
The company's own historian dismissed the allegations yesterday and said there was no evidence to support the theory that Schaeffler processed death camp inmates' hair industrially during the Second World War.
But Dr Jacek Lachendro, a historian at the Auschwitz museum, told Germany's Der Spiegel television channel that 1.95 tonnes of cloth made from inmates' hair had been discovered at a former Schaeffler textile and army tank parts factory in the town of Kiertz (formerly Katscher) after the Germans withdrew at the end of the war.
The amount of cloth, which was pictured on Spiegel television as rolls of closely-woven brownish fabric, was said to have derived from the hair shorn from some 40,000 Auschwitz prisoners. Dr Lachendro said that subsequent analysis of the hair showed that some of it contained traces of the Zyklon B gas used by the Nazis to murder millions in the death camps.
Former workers at the factory in Kiertz who were interviewed on the programme said that they remembered two wagon-loads of human hair being delivered to the company in 1943. Kiertz is three hours' drive away from the Auschwitz camp.
Hair was routinely shorn from prisoners, usually on arrival, at the death camps. The Nazi war machine used it to make army blankets and socks for U-boat crews. The Auschwitz museum on the site of the former death camp displays a store filled to the roof with inmates' hair originally intended for so-called "human recycling".
The Kiertz textile factory where the hair is alleged to have been processed formerly belonged to the Jewish-owned Davistan AG concern on which the Schaeffler empire was founded after it was taken over by the brothers Wilhelm and Georg Schaeffler. Their company made armaments for the Nazi war machine, but after the Second World War it re-emerged as one of Germany's main suppliers of parts to the car industry, specialising in needle roller bearings.
However, the devastating impact of the credit crunch coupled with Schaeffler's misjudged hostile takeover of the tyre giant Continental have since plunged the concern into its worst crisis since the war.
Maria-Elisabeth Schaeffler, an Austrian born former medical student, married into the concern and became its sole owner in 1996 after her husband, Georg, died. Last month she took the unprecedented step of joining a demonstration staged by 800 of her company's employees to appeal for government help. Previously, the company's management style had been called "feudal".
Mrs Merkel's government, which is currently being asked to provide state aid for Germany's ailing Opel car company, has still to decide whether it will help Schaeffler with a bailout.
Not much of a war machine if they could not produce enough wool to make army blankets. And is there something special about socks for U-Boats crews?
Incredible.
“filthy bosch” has a whole new meaning, no?
Submarines get mighty cold in the North Atlantic. Anything that provides insulation is a benefit.
Let’s not ask where fetal stem cells come from or how industry will get enough for commerical use if scientific tests prove “successful”.
“Submarines get mighty cold in the North Atlantic. Anything that provides insulation is a benefit.”
Your response, while technically true, seems a bit nonchalant and insensitive, considering that the German sailors were using socks made from the hair shorn of the soon-to-be exterminated. I doubt that the sailors knew this, I think they would have been shocked to know this.
The article isn’t specific, but how did the Zyklon B get into or on the hair? If heads were shorn upon arrival, wouldn’t the collected hair be somewhere else when the prisoners were gassed? I’m guessing the trace amounts are surface traces, as opposed to within the hair itself.
The Germans weren’t as ignorant about what was going on as you may think. The German Army certainly wasn’t.
I just finished Saul Friedlander’s second volume of his amazing (and amazingly sad) Nazi Germany and the Jews books, entitled The Years of Extermination. Highly recommended. I thought I basically knew everything there was to know about the Holocaust but the more I read the more horrors there are to uncover. It’s funny what sticks in your head. I didn’t know that German Jews were forbidden to own pets under a law promulgated in (I think) 1942. This means they had to get rid of the pets they already owned. But, since the law also forbade them to give their pets to others they were forced to have them killed. A small thing perhaps in the grand scheme of things but another piece of evidence that the Germans didn’t merely want to kill Jews, they also wanted to maximize their suffering.
See my post number 11. Friedlander amply documents that knowledge of the fate of Europe's Jews was well known throughout Europe by, at the latest, 1942. They all knew what was happening.
How about not bailing out any failing companies, no matter what their management might have done in the 1940s?
Let’s say the horrific charge is true. Unless some of the same people are still working for the company, I fail to see how this is relevant to the company’s current travails.
My guess is that if they went to submariners it was because there would never be any evidence if they lost an engagement with the Allies. Socks of this nature would have been much more obvious had they been worn by the Army—who were being captured by the tens of thousands.
Just a thought.
Allegations - nothing more.
*yawn*
BTW, those lampshades didn’t exist either.
Hair grows back and can be shorn again.
If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Ummm, let me see now, why are the decisions and actions from nearly 70 years ago—as dreadful as the were—of men who are now long dead, of any relevance at all to the current day company?
Sounds like a way for a Polish company to stick it to a German competitor.
It’s like a Maine based company “revealing” that an Atlanta based company—or its ancestor firm—used slave labor 150 years ago. Horrors!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.