



Not sexy??? Megan, you don't know what "sexy" is...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: markomalley
Darn thing is a flying tank.
2 posted on
01/29/2009 4:39:13 AM PST by
fredhead
(Liberals think globally, reason rectally, act idiotically.)
To: markomalley
I can’t begin to tell you how utterly devastating and pure kick ass this platform is. I’ve called them in from the ground and worked with them in the air on JAAT missions, They are a pure joy to watch and I thank God they’re on our side.
3 posted on
01/29/2009 4:42:16 AM PST by
TADSLOS
(McCain always has a job as Obama's Butt Boy when he loses his seat in 2010)
To: markomalley
One of my hands down favorite planes.
4 posted on
01/29/2009 4:42:58 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: markomalley
Love the The A-10 Thunderbolt II.
7 posted on
01/29/2009 4:48:06 AM PST by
steelyourfaith
(ObamaNation: Tax cheat sworn in as Treasury Secretary --- you can't make this stuff up !!!)
To: markomalley
The A-10 along with Apache helicopters were responsible for the Highway to Hell victory during the end of Desert Storm.
8 posted on
01/29/2009 4:48:29 AM PST by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: markomalley
A couple of good A-10 videos :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iz5MwPsfyo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJSk2Xc3Eq4&feature=related
9 posted on
01/29/2009 4:48:39 AM PST by
cweese
(Hook 'em Horns!!!)
To: markomalley
It took our Air Force this long to figure this out???
Or...it took this long for it to get reported?
When did the actual mission platform emphasis shift?
10 posted on
01/29/2009 4:51:42 AM PST by
Logic n' Reason
(Never mistake tolerance for acceptance)
To: markomalley
Much slower than a fighter, doesn't fly as high as primadonna surveillance, can't be a vehicle for airborne troops, more army than air force and as old as dirt. Having said this - Most beautiful thing I ever saw was an A-10 fire at night! The Hog kicks arse!
To: markomalley
‘Not sexy??? Megan, you don’t know what “sexy” is... ‘
Got that right. This is a infantry troop’s best friend on the battlefield, after his rifle.
14 posted on
01/29/2009 5:01:44 AM PST by
Badeye
(There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
To: markomalley
There is nothing more sexy to the guys (and girls) on the ground as a hog in the air.
16 posted on
01/29/2009 5:03:05 AM PST by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
To: markomalley
The A-10: the flying gatlin gun
17 posted on
01/29/2009 5:05:03 AM PST by
bobjam
To: markomalley
Beauty is as beauty does. I’ll bet she looks like Miss Universe to our troops on the ground, and like the devil incarnate to our enemies.
18 posted on
01/29/2009 5:06:28 AM PST by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: markomalley
Comparing the A-10 to an air to air fighter is like comparing apples to coconuts. They have vastly different roles. Without the fighters to clear out enemy aircraft, the A-10 and the choppers are slow flying target-practice for enemy fighters. Red Flag makes a lot of sense for Air-to-Air because fighter pilots don't get a lot of opportunities to fly Dissimilar Air Combat Tactics (i.e., against other types of aircraft using enemy tactics). An A-10 needs to work with Army ground units so they can get realistic training at the Army Ranges.
One type of aircraft is useless without the other. The A-10 can't fly in an environment where we don't have air superiority and the air-to-air planes can't take and hold the ground.
24 posted on
01/29/2009 5:17:34 AM PST by
mbynack
(Retired USAF SMSgt)
To: markomalley; SAMWolf; alfa6; CholeraJoe; Valin; Samwise
31 posted on
01/29/2009 5:39:56 AM PST by
Professional Engineer
(You don't know the power of the Dork Side. | Can he lead a normal life? No, he'll be an engineer.)
To: markomalley
Problem is, haven't they stopped making A-10's? And there isn't an A-10 replacement in development either. The JSF is billed as taking over the air-to-ground role, but I don't think it would do nearly as good as the A-10.
We also need a UAV with a big Gatling that can act as a "mini-me" A-10.
36 posted on
01/29/2009 5:56:55 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
(We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
To: markomalley
Now here's sexy:

Don't know about the hair on the chest part...
43 posted on
01/29/2009 6:09:25 AM PST by
Rev DMV
To: markomalley
Regardless, now A-10 pilots have a little more cachet, or as Johnson put it, hair on their chest. Know of at least one A-10 pilot that doesn't fit into the "hair on the chest" category. She goes by the name "KC" short for 'killer chick' and was featured on ABC's GMA back during the early months of the Iraq war. Someone out there in FReeper land probably has a picture they can post. She's one of those definitely not guilty types.
45 posted on
01/29/2009 6:13:40 AM PST by
BluH2o
To: markomalley
We need an upgraded replacement. Troops shouldn’t be expected to fight without close air support.
48 posted on
01/29/2009 6:18:14 AM PST by
popdonnelly
(The problem with Obama is that he believes his own hype.)
To: markomalley
I live in the flight path of the A-10’s at NAS Willow Grove. They cruise by in pairs. Appears to be student in front A-10 and an instructor off their wing. They ain’t pretty but they are the most survivable.
The locals have never seen them spitting fire and kickin’ ass.
To: markomalley
Maybe what we need is a carrier version of the A 10
59 posted on
01/29/2009 6:47:52 AM PST by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . The original point of America was not to be Europe)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson