Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Caption Obama SCOTUS visit
Obama File ^ | 1/15/2009 | rxsid

Posted on 01/15/2009 10:38:24 AM PST by rxsid



TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; History; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; constitution; obama; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: rxsid

I guess we’ll just have to keep dreaming about that day when a man is
judged by the content of his character, rather than the color of his skin.


21 posted on 01/15/2009 11:06:58 AM PST by tumblindice (I hope someday to be the man my dog thinks I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

Note that Justice Thomas has chosen to stand at the very back of the group. I think that’s message enough about what he thinks of him. :)


22 posted on 01/15/2009 11:09:43 AM PST by Constitution Day (Big Brotha Is Watching You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

i think all the BS said about him( barry), he really believes now. he is the messiah, he is the second coming, he is the smartest man in the world, he has better pecs than putin.....


23 posted on 01/15/2009 11:09:43 AM PST by machogirl (not one of Rush's top-ten gal names)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

According to that same 1/14/09 townhall.com article:

It’s something of a tradition for incoming presidents and vice presidents to pay their respects to the court, though not all have made the trip. Bill Clinton and his vice president-elect Al Gore, called on the court in December 1992, and Ronald Reagan and his vice president-elect, George H. W. Bush, visited in November 1980.

The 0bama team said Wednesday’s visit was private, with no press permitted.


24 posted on 01/15/2009 11:10:13 AM PST by mtngrandpa (Fighting the Insurgency at Home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Well.....Here we are gang!...Just one big room of liberal losers!....Now lets get busy and see how many ways we can screw the taxpayers of America!


25 posted on 01/15/2009 11:10:27 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

i don’t remember SCOTUS meeting with W? I do remember that SCOTUS didn’t attend the Billary’s state of the union (?) after his lewinksi.


26 posted on 01/15/2009 11:11:11 AM PST by machogirl (not one of Rush's top-ten gal names)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mtngrandpa

i would hope that they read him the riot act. then after that, they probably discussed the strategy to allow barry to take office.


27 posted on 01/15/2009 11:13:41 AM PST by machogirl (not one of Rush's top-ten gal names)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

Indeed!


28 posted on 01/15/2009 11:14:09 AM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

think that his ego is too large for a helmet.


29 posted on 01/15/2009 11:14:32 AM PST by machogirl (not one of Rush's top-ten gal names)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

lol

that is why he aint got it on!


30 posted on 01/15/2009 11:20:17 AM PST by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. - One of General Abram's men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: machogirl
Only happened twice before (at least in 'modern' times):

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2775

in part:
"It’s something of a tradition for incoming presidents and vice presidents to pay their respects to the court, though not all have made the trip. Bill Clinton and his vice president-elect, Al Gore, called on the court in December 1992, and Ronald Reagan and his vice president-elect, George H. W. Bush, visited in November 1980.

The Obama team said Wednesday’s visit was private, with no press permitted."

I love how they try to spin it as 'something of a tradition.' Twice, out of how many times...and it's a tradition? haha.

31 posted on 01/15/2009 11:20:46 AM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mtngrandpa

Then where did the photo come from?


32 posted on 01/15/2009 11:27:02 AM PST by Ro_Thunder ("Other than ending SLAVERY, FASCISM, NAZISM and COMMUNISM, war has never solved anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Obama's post-SCOTUS visit picture: "Whew...they didn't ask about my birth certificate"


33 posted on 01/15/2009 11:29:04 AM PST by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri

haha...nice!


34 posted on 01/15/2009 11:31:11 AM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Craption:

“I’ll show you mine if you show me yours!”


35 posted on 01/15/2009 11:34:22 AM PST by wxgesr (I want to be the first person to surf on another planet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtngrandpa
"With 31 court cases thrown under the bus, the photo makes it look like a 0bama celebration of his deceit of the American people. I don’t expect anything to happen now that the messiah has blessed the court with his presence."

There are some opinions out there as to why SCOTUS hasn't acted....just yet.

From the same place I referenced this pic (at the top of the page at the moment):

"The Supreme Court had to wait until now for Berg to have standing. There is no precedence for this case. It is a historical decision and they will do everything they can to get it right. The constitution does not establish who vets the candidate. Part of their decision will determine who, or what will be held responsible in the future, if not now. It could destroy the Democratic Party if they are proved to be part of an intentional fraud. If Obama does not provide the documentation they request, he will be held in contempt, and they WILL obtain it.

Here's another view of this chess game. It explains how the SCOTUS has Obama in Check Mate.

Both Donofrio's and Wrotnowski’s cases said the burden lays with the Secretary of State (SoS) not doing their job. There is no law that states that it is their job. So, the SoS would win the case. In Conference, they probably talked about who was responsible to vet the candidate. If it wasn’t the SoS of each state, they did not want to waste valuable court time and not hold Obama accountable. The burden to each SoS to vet each candidate for each office would be prohibitive in both time and expense. You will notice that neither cases were completely released but pending. They can be revisited and opinions may be written on them when a final release is given. Berg’s case, on the other hand, places the burden on the candidate, the party, and the FEC. Berg, however, did not have standing until Congress certified the electoral votes to present his case. He now has standing, as do Keyes and the other California cases."

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm

36 posted on 01/15/2009 11:36:22 AM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper
"Okay, who left the white pubic hair on this chair?"

LMAO. As Ruth 'bad girl' Ginsberg looks down....

37 posted on 01/15/2009 11:37:47 AM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Caption

“Justice Thomas made to go to back of the bus.”


38 posted on 01/15/2009 11:44:40 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

Sam Alito had the strength of character to decline the meeting with this affirmative action wicked bastard.


39 posted on 01/15/2009 11:47:13 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Good for him!

I did not read the full article so thanks for telling me.


40 posted on 01/15/2009 11:48:28 AM PST by Constitution Day (Big Brotha Is Watching You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson