Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Obama has already lost in Supreme Court v Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et al
Anti Mullah Blog ^ | 1/11/09 | Tom Waite

Posted on 01/11/2009 9:18:59 AM PST by FreeManN

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-206 next last
To: Non-Sequitur

Ok, well, I don’t know what the legal remedy would be or if there is precedent, but if he’s constitutionally ineligible then he should not be allowed to serve. Hopefully these things will be worked out.


161 posted on 01/11/2009 3:35:33 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
It's articles like this one below that make me not trust this man. They always say you can tell a lot about a person by looking at their friends;

You (and others) seem to have mistook my cynicism of this BC conspiracy (and the shady characters involved with it) as a full-on endorsement of Obama. That is not the case.

162 posted on 01/11/2009 3:35:42 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: DE88; Kevmo
But it isn’t going to be solved by the likes of Berg

Berg, Berg, Berg!

Why do you keep discussing Berg?

Nice try, but your template is stale.

163 posted on 01/11/2009 3:39:19 PM PST by fanfan (Update on Constitutional Crisis in Canada.....Click user name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN
What is most amusing is how astonishing ignorant the obots are.

Amusing?

I'm having trouble laughing, as I see my sons future fade.

These people need to be confronted at every turn, not negotiuated with or ignored.

They might be funny if they weren't so dangerous!

164 posted on 01/11/2009 3:42:14 PM PST by airborne (I know it's just my opinion, but I've worked hard on forming it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Because Berg was the pioneer of this whole charade? What was the subject of the OP? Berg.


165 posted on 01/11/2009 3:45:35 PM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Ok, well, I don’t know what the legal remedy would be or if there is precedent, but if he’s constitutionally ineligible then he should not be allowed to serve. Hopefully these things will be worked out.

Agreed on both counts. Right or wrong I have enough faith in this country and it's institutions to believe that Obama will not serve if found ineligible. And I have enough hope to believe that at worst he will be a one term president. That's really what we all need to start concentrating on.

166 posted on 01/11/2009 3:47:04 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: DE88

I’ve already said Berg is not the issue.

Are you thick, or obtuse?


167 posted on 01/11/2009 3:52:04 PM PST by fanfan (Update on Constitutional Crisis in Canada.....Click user name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Whether it is Berg or whomever, it is the same issue. The same lack of evidence. Are you incapable if understanding that fact?


168 posted on 01/11/2009 4:03:19 PM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: nufsed
Yes, the date says late october on that document.

"I don't think that shows hundreds of thousands of dollars nor did I see any Obama documents related to any other case or the supreme court filings."

Alright.

Here's another related to the same case a little over a week later:

If I happen across any more I'll let you know. I only look at them because of the case law that's put in there by the slickster lawyers. Guessing games about exactly how much was spent I'll leave to others.

169 posted on 01/11/2009 4:08:11 PM PST by nominal (Christus dominus. Christus veritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: nominal

me and my html: http://www.fec.gov/law/litigation/berg_ac_obama_resp_emerg_mot.pdf


170 posted on 01/11/2009 4:09:24 PM PST by nominal (Christus dominus. Christus veritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: nominal

My thoery is that after the election he is paying expenses from surplus campaign money. On the docs. I would expect any defense filing to be procedural and not have detail about proof that he is legitimate.


171 posted on 01/11/2009 4:14:00 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

I have given up trying to explain the difference between a “Certification of Live Birth” and a “Certificate of Live Birth” to those who just don’t get it. Even with pictures of one next to the other, they still do not get it. A “Certification” have very little information compared to what a “Certificate” has, and some STILL do not get it!

Barack Hussien Obama aka Barry Soetoro does not want to show his long form birth certificate, and so far has succeeded in keeping it from public view. He wouldn’t dare show his college applications either, and one can only guess why. Perhaps his name was Barry Soetoro from Indonesia, you think? That would mean he dropped his US citizenship as Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship. So when did he change his name back from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussien Obama? Those documents are not to be seen either.


172 posted on 01/11/2009 4:17:04 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

“We will know sometime Monday morning. Here is the link to watch on Monday morning.
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/08ordersofthecourt.html";

Thanks, but the orders posted for Jan. 9 clearly show that only 4 cases were accepted for review, none of them related to BHO’s citizenship:
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/010909zr.pdf

The norm is for cases in which certiorari is granted to be announced in the orders for the Friday these cases are reviewed. All other cases denied review by the Court typically are listed without comment the following Monday.
Thus, unless this has been handled in a non-routine matter, BHO’s citizenship case will AGAIN be listed Monday among the many other cases also denied review by the Court last Friday.

My goal isn’t to burst any bubbles: just to calibrate expectations to more realistic levels.


173 posted on 01/11/2009 4:22:18 PM PST by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

Please explain how someone “drops” their US citizenship.


174 posted on 01/11/2009 4:22:49 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

Only the big philly firm isn’t affiliated with the DNC or the Obama campaign like the other 2. And the philly firm wasn’t listed on opensecrets either, IIRC, but the other 2 were. e.g. The Sandler Reiff Young firm was charging ~$35-$45 thousand a month for months, but it doesn’t specify for what, exactly. Somebody knows, but not me.


175 posted on 01/11/2009 4:23:40 PM PST by nominal (Christus dominus. Christus veritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: nominal

Thanx


176 posted on 01/11/2009 4:24:52 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: DE88

Don’t you hope so n00b.


177 posted on 01/11/2009 4:35:22 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: shoutingandpointing
It makes no sense to do what 0 has done and continues to do, UNLESS he—to borrow from his own phrazemology—”HAS SOME SKIN IN THE GAME.”

Notice how many elected GOP folks are talkin about it? NONE

Maybe the skin Obama has, is waiting to burn the GOP with his certificate, if and only if required to do so by a court. Or if some prominent GOP people talk it up.

Remember when other (white) Presidents-elect handed out their birth certificates, in the past? NONE

Can you say racist rightwingers only want certificate from black President elect, although never required in the past?

Prominent GOP figures aren't walking into a fairly obvious political trap.

178 posted on 01/11/2009 4:39:21 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: nufsed
Perhaps I should not have used the word “drop/ed”. Actually Obama didn't do it. His step father, Lolo Soetoro, adopted Obama and in doing so Obama became a citizen of Indonesia. Since Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship, Obama’s US citizenship (if he actually was born on US soil) would have been(given up;renounced;suspended;dropped; ?)

Obama as an adult could have gone through the process of legally reestablishing his US citizenship but no one has seen the documents showing that he did give up Indonesian citizenship and reinstate his US citizenship.

179 posted on 01/11/2009 5:24:35 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: conservativegramma

“So there ya go....we have to wait until Monday, the 12th.”

Unfortunately, their modus operandi seems to be to announce successful suits on Friday and unsuccessful ones on Monday.


180 posted on 01/11/2009 5:30:06 PM PST by Nipfan (The desire to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it - H L Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson