Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nufsed
Yes, the date says late october on that document.

"I don't think that shows hundreds of thousands of dollars nor did I see any Obama documents related to any other case or the supreme court filings."

Alright.

Here's another related to the same case a little over a week later:

If I happen across any more I'll let you know. I only look at them because of the case law that's put in there by the slickster lawyers. Guessing games about exactly how much was spent I'll leave to others.

169 posted on 01/11/2009 4:08:11 PM PST by nominal (Christus dominus. Christus veritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: nominal

me and my html: http://www.fec.gov/law/litigation/berg_ac_obama_resp_emerg_mot.pdf


170 posted on 01/11/2009 4:09:24 PM PST by nominal (Christus dominus. Christus veritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

To: nominal

My thoery is that after the election he is paying expenses from surplus campaign money. On the docs. I would expect any defense filing to be procedural and not have detail about proof that he is legitimate.


171 posted on 01/11/2009 4:14:00 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson