Skip to comments.
Beautiful Israeli Women Soldiers | 206 Pics
yeeeeee.com ^
| 27 October 2008
Posted on 12/29/2008 4:16:25 PM PST by lizol
I'd say this must be a real problem to be a male commander of a unit consisting of such soldiers, like you can see below.
Enjoy :-)
http://www.yeeeeee.com/2008/10/27/beautiful-israeli-women-soldiers-206-pics/
TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Chit/Chat; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: idf; israel; yummy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 last
To: JillValentine
LMAO !......Merry New Year !
61
posted on
12/29/2008 6:51:04 PM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: lizol
62
posted on
12/29/2008 7:00:35 PM PST
by
Hoodat
(For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
To: JillValentine
Can’t blame you. I like kissing girls too.
To: SAMWolf; Colonel_Flagg; alfa6; Iris7; colorado tanker; PhilDragoo
To: lizol
Are some of these girls Lebanese?
To: lizol
Where do I sign up??? !!!!
66
posted on
12/29/2008 8:53:25 PM PST
by
ColdSteelTalon
(America land soon to be of the enslaved...)
To: MarineBrat; pissant; posterchild; doubled; bk1000; mouser; llevrok; Red in Blue PA; MilspecRob; ...
Israeli Hottie Ping (Chicks and guns)
To be on or off the list please FReepmail me.
Thanks to MarineBrat for the heads up.
67
posted on
12/29/2008 9:06:51 PM PST
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: lizol
68
posted on
12/30/2008 6:32:08 AM PST
by
backwoods-engineer
(Proud to be an American, where I least I know I'm free!)
To: JillValentine
Saw your profile page.
You’ve got a sexy mind.
69
posted on
12/30/2008 7:52:20 AM PST
by
George Smiley
(Palin is the real deal.)
To: Mike Darancette
I don’t care who they sleep with.
:-)
70
posted on
12/30/2008 2:55:20 PM PST
by
George Smiley
(Palin is the real deal.)
To: alarm rider
Israeli military of all ranks have long been known for sloppy saluting.
71
posted on
12/31/2008 6:17:55 PM PST
by
Mogwai
(Palin/Santorum 2012!)
To: Mogwai
Interesting. Why would that be?
72
posted on
12/31/2008 6:34:50 PM PST
by
alarm rider
("Father, let me dedicate all this year to thee". Lawrence Tuttiett (1825-1897))
To: lizol
To: JillValentine
What if it’s a female pig?
74
posted on
01/01/2009 6:20:36 AM PST
by
Lee'sGhost
(Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
To: alarm rider
Part of it is just time frame, that Israel’s such a young country that they haven’t had much time to develop military pomp and formality, while reverence for guerillas and irregulars and swashbuckling raiders like Ariel Sharon’s parachute battalion, no sticklers for ceremony, are fresh in the mind. Beyond that, the Israeli military has long been individualistic and less rigidly hierarchical in ways that to foreigners might suggest indiscipline or insubordination, but in fact do not compromise combat ability or effectiveness. And I’m sure that the fact that most Israeli young people must spend some of their salad days in the military (universal draft) promotes the idea that they should be able to enjoy themselves, and be free from non-essential discipline and formality, as much as possible while defending their country.
75
posted on
01/01/2009 5:30:04 PM PST
by
Mogwai
(Palin/Santorum 2012!)
To: Mogwai
I understand your position, and I agree with some of your points.
However, lack of discipline is a management problem. That problem unless addressed will, most surely, come back to bite you in the a$$. I am sure you have heard that in order to perform as a good soldier (airman, sailor, Marine, etc.) it is important to look the part. As simplistic as that sounds, it is 100% correct.
An individualistic military will fight or not fight as same, and in the long run, it loses battles and wars that would have otherwise have been won.
If your officer corps, and your NCO corps have not been trained properly, and do not understand the importance of appearance, pride in uniform, discipline and attention to orders, then that's what you get with your young soldiers.
There is no excuse acceptable for a fighting force, especially one that has a large burden to defend an entire nation to allow silliness as was portrayed in the photos.
Just my opinion, but there it is.
Regards,
AR
76
posted on
01/01/2009 5:59:25 PM PST
by
alarm rider
("Father, let me dedicate all this year to thee". Lawrence Tuttiett (1825-1897))
To: alarm rider
I have to agree with you. From the pictures, some of the things suggest that the IDF may not be all that well trained. In the last 13 months I've spent about 5 weeks in the UK training with the British Army. From the American perspective (it was most definitely unanimous among us), the British have almost no weapons discipline. I mean, they'll point at you with their rifle (muzzle in your face or chest) like it's a pointing stick. And they have a very bad habit of leaving their weapons lying around. Look, I'm an intel soldier in an essentially non-deployable MOS, but I'd NEVER, EVER do that. If an American infantryman ever did that, I'd hope his squad leader would physically beat him and produce some blood (I'm serious). The only time I do not have hands on my weapon is when I am sleeping. Yeah, I could put it in my sleeping bag, tie it to my wrist, etc. And I felt very uneasy about propping it up against my cot as I slept! I don't think I ever got used to that.
Now, weapons discipline is way different than saluting, but still. Drill and Ceremony is emphasized big time in the U.S. Army (at least in schools and the training environment). At your unit - not so much.
I will say that these Israeli soldiers are indeed very beautiful. I have to admit seeing so many females in uniform does make me cringe, though. I can't stand most of the females I've come across in the military. Some are OK, and indeed some are excellent soldiers. But the majority? Pass. And for whatever reason, it seems that the Army has the least attractive females of all the branches. But there is definitely no connection between attractiveness and the quality of the soldier.
And last thing - the uniforms. I guess equivalent to Class B's, or the U.S. Navy's utilities? Probably the latter. Yeah, it makes the female soldiers look really good. Sure does. But the appearance is neither professional nor military. Plus it doesn't exactly discourage sexual assault/rape.
77
posted on
01/01/2009 8:32:15 PM PST
by
tlj18
(I'm staying Army, no matter who my Commander-in-Chief is!)
To: lizol
78
posted on
01/01/2009 8:37:30 PM PST
by
BCR #226
(07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
To: lizol
79
posted on
01/01/2009 11:57:15 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
(I'll go green when they plant me in the ground.)
To: tlj18
I served (TDY) with the RAF briefly. IMO, they were pretty well squared away regarding military discipline, the officers took very little crap from the enlisted personnel, more than once I witnessed an officer chewing out a flight-line type. I ran across a couple of SAS types, they were fairly ok while in “class A” type uniforms. Weapons discipline was good, at least on the aircraft IMO. As pilots, I cannot fault the RAF at all.
It is interesting that the English do formal ceremony so well, but I get you point about the Brit infantry, I have heard that before.
80
posted on
01/02/2009 6:29:14 PM PST
by
alarm rider
("Father, let me dedicate all this year to thee". Lawrence Tuttiett (1825-1897))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson