Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MICHELLE OBAMA ON "COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS"
Atlas Shrugs ^ | 12/26/2008 | Free America

Posted on 12/26/2008 6:48:08 AM PST by Free America52

First off, the biggest ass-kissing media refers to Michelle Obama as a 'distinguished attorney" despite the fact that Michelle Obama has been"inactive" since 1993.

(Excerpt) Read more at atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: auntesther; chicagomachine; chicagoway; fawningmedia; flotusmichelle; lawyers; medialies; michelleobama; obama; sendintheclowns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: Non-Sequitur
"She can reactivate her license at any time"

Only if she completes all the continuing education requirements from past years and pay all past state license fees.

There is a 15 year span between 1993 and 2008. The number of continuing education hours to 'catch up' may be 300 hours or more. That is a long time of classroom hours.

41 posted on 12/26/2008 9:44:54 AM PST by moonman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
According to a comment at the source link:

An attorney writes me:

as an attorney i am telling you that people can "choose" to not pay their registration fees or take their continuing education of the bar and therefore go on "suspension...or inactive status that goes thru the CAL BAR--the california bar association this ADRC is for discipline reasons...not for those volunteering to stop practicing. it is COURT ORDERED...not "michelle obama ordered" their website was very clear about their function and why they step in.

42 posted on 12/26/2008 10:37:01 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: moonman

It is not unusual for women with children to do this and many do reactivate their licenses later. I fail to see why this is even an issue...are we gong to be like Dems and attack, attack... for nonsense? Give me a break.


43 posted on 12/26/2008 11:58:10 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PackerBoy

I doubt she could pass them, unless they are pay to play.


44 posted on 12/26/2008 12:54:12 PM PST by razorback-bert (Save the planet...it is the only known one with beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
...not for those volunteering to stop practicing. it is COURT ORDERED...

You look at the ARDC entry for Michelle Obama and is says her status is "Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law." If her license was yanked for disciplinary reasons then how would the status be voluntary.

I have no idea how things work in California, but in Illinois the ARDC operates under the authority of the Illinois Supreme Court. In 1993 all suspensions, be they voluntary or involuntary, were covered by Supreme Court Rule 770 and went through them. Change from this voluntary inactive status required an act of the Supreme Court to implement. This act is purely administrative, but is still done under the authority of the court.

Here are the details Link.

45 posted on 12/26/2008 2:27:43 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

my assumption is that when she left SA she wasn’t going to be able to pay for her malpractice insurance if she was going to work for Public Allies


46 posted on 12/26/2008 3:22:15 PM PST by MissDairyGoodnessVT (Good Morning Mr & Mrs Scooter and All The Ships At Sea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

could she have been found “unfit” to practice thru her employment at Sidley Austin thru her performance as an employee ,say,lacking the basics to complete her job task(s)?or some egregious type of behavior where she would have gone thru all the wrong channels to accomplish something?what would be the scenario here?


47 posted on 12/26/2008 3:29:13 PM PST by MissDairyGoodnessVT (Good Morning Mr & Mrs Scooter and All The Ships At Sea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MissDairyGoodnessVT
my assumption is that when she left SA she wasn’t going to be able to pay for her malpractice insurance if she was going to work for Public Allies.

You can assume what you want.

48 posted on 12/27/2008 6:38:34 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
Odumbo being compared to his (non-sequitur’s) object-worship Abe Lincoln?

Maybe, Ape Lincoln is close enough.

49 posted on 12/27/2008 8:00:53 AM PST by melancholy (When a marxist is elected BOTUS, (B = Butt), shiite happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
LOL! I wonder how non-sequitur feels about Odumbo being compared to his (non-sequitur’s) object-worship Abe Lincoln?

Amused. The same kind of reaction I get when I come across one of your posts.

50 posted on 12/27/2008 8:02:44 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“Amused. The same kind of reaction I get when I come across one of your posts.”

At least you have the good sense to read my posts.


51 posted on 12/27/2008 8:40:03 AM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
At least you have the good sense to read my posts.

For comic relief alone I assure you. As for Obama, there isn't any lack of ego on his part trying to link himself with Abraham Lincoln, one of the greatest presidents this country has produced. Most people would have waited till they actually did something first.

52 posted on 12/27/2008 9:17:38 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

fer shure & Merry Christmas to ya’!!!


53 posted on 12/27/2008 9:28:26 AM PST by MissDairyGoodnessVT (Good Morning Mr & Mrs Scooter and All The Ships At Sea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

We will continue to disagree on Lincoln: You think he was a water-walker; I think he was a despot who was largely responsible for the destruction of the republic envisioned and created by the Founders.


54 posted on 12/27/2008 10:27:01 AM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy
are we gong to be like Dems and attack, attack... for nonsense?
Worked for them! Time for Plan B? ;-)
55 posted on 12/27/2008 12:32:24 PM PST by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here. ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
We will continue to disagree on Lincoln: You think he was a water-walker; I think he was a despot who was largely responsible for the destruction of the republic envisioned and created by the Founders.

If the Founders envisioned a republic where a crooked drone class could lie, cheat and rabble rouse their way into a rebellion for the idea that human beings are property you might be right.

Anybody who is tempted to disapprove of Lincoln needs to take a hard look at the losers who were his opponents.

56 posted on 12/27/2008 12:38:03 PM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

“If the Founders envisioned a republic where a crooked drone class could lie, cheat and rabble rouse their way into a rebellion for the idea that human beings are property you might be right.”

(Sigh.) The Founders created a republic in which the individual states were co-equals, retaining much of their powers and rights, giving up only an enumerated few to a federal government whose purpose was to serve the interests of the UNITED states themselves; other than those rights and powers given to the federal government, limited as they were, all other powers, rights and privileges were retained by the states and the People. Lincoln was well known to have disagreed vehemently with that, as he was a very vocal proponent of the idea of a dominant federal government exercising control over subordinate states.

And, oh, by the way: What “crooked, drone class” are you talking about? Hollywood producers?


57 posted on 12/27/2008 3:20:38 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
We will continue to disagree on Lincoln...I think he was a despot who was largely responsible for the destruction of the republic envisioned and created by the Founders.

Of course you do.

58 posted on 12/27/2008 3:50:20 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54

It did not work for them...The Republicans did it to themselves with their profligate spending and lack of a backbone. There has never been a president in recent history with lower rating than Pres. Bush-the economy plays a part in this. If the GOP goes down this road, it will only hurt them more in the end.


59 posted on 12/27/2008 4:53:06 PM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
Lincoln believed in the Founders' concept of a federal republic where the states were sovereign in their realm and the general government was sovereign in its realm. Believe it or not, there's a middle ground between the total centralization many leftists desire today and the self-serving anarchy the secession wished to promote. That middle ground is what Lincoln preserved.

And, oh, by the way: What “crooked, drone class” are you talking about? Hollywood producers?

You need to read about the dirty tricks the politicians used to gain a secession in Georgia and Tennessee. Evidence that the Democrats have always been the party of political corruption and mendacity.

And I think that drone class is an apt name of a class that got rich on the sweat of human property.

60 posted on 12/28/2008 5:04:03 AM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson