Posted on 12/21/2008 9:00:16 AM PST by jackofhearts
...week later they had dinner together, and Mr. Weinstein’s attraction grew in direct proportion to Mr. Perreault’s dining pleasure. “He looked like he was sensually enjoying what he was eating,” said Mr. Weinstein, who is also a food writer. “This was a guy I could like.”...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
I really don’t believe they’ve been monogamous 32 years. This does not pass the smell test. And, of course, “monogamous” to homosexuals has to be put into parentheses. I may mean that they only pick up another trick now and then and never had a steady boyfriend on the side. No matter the facts in this case, this story is PURE PROPAGANDA.
You didn’t need to “choose” the standard issue. However, every human being makes choices about sex - with who, how, when, how often, etc.
What is the link at DU? I couldn’t find the thread.
Learn to read a posting. I explained what freedom is.
Those were all the ones I could find doing a simple search. I found others but I didn’t want to pay $34 or $45 for each study. Every place I went to talked about how hard it was to find data on it because most people only focus on male/female domestic violence. They have few studies done on female-male or homosexual domestic violence.
I have known homosexuals, and have studied this psychological and moral aberration since the 1970s, and I *do* know. It IS a matter of childhood conditions. Every homosexual I've known fit the pattern, namely, dominant mother and emotionally or physically absent father. The father has a huge impact on the emotional growth and well being of children of BOTH genders. Homosexuals of either gender have a profound “daddy hunger” which never gets satisfied.
Look pal, your idea that “anyone cna do anything they want whenever they want and screw anyone else” is a moral statement just as much as the people who don’t want to have to accept others’ lifestyle choices.
You want to live in a world where perverts sleep with little boys, or 20 people want to get married together, or a gal and her dog want to get married, or whatever, then convince yourself they are all morally equal and live the lie.
Oh the DRAMA! LOL!
Civil unions and even more so gay marriage means adoption and fostering children, as well as artificially insemination, with subsequent huge numbers of seriously disturbed children.
THere are untold numbers of formerly homosexual persons. No one is born “gay”.
Apart from that fact, “gay” sex acts are unhealthy even if practiced monogamously. And the fact that they are proud and “important” homosexuals means that they promote the gay life in one way or another - here’s a damn article about how wonderful they are! How much money have they donated to “gay” causes? Or visits to Thailand or the PI, using boy prostitutes?
Homosexuals are notoriously promiscuous as well as being almost universally attracted to underage boys.
There is nothing happy about being “gay”. It is a serious sexual, psychological and spiritual disorder and is not benign or harmless.
There are large numbers of former homosexuals.
No one is born “gay” any more than anyone is born a thief or born a liar or an adulterer.
Some people may have more of a proneness to be tempted into one wrong behavior or another, obviously. But the vast majority of homosexuals - both men and women - were molested as children or young adolescents. That is a big factor, as well as often very dysfunctional families.
Do lying, cheating and adultery have political movements to legalize such sins, complete with parades in many cities and clubs in public schools for teaching youngsters how to do them?
I went to a seminar in college with some of my fellow students who were gay. There was one girl who was raised by two women. She was straight but started to train herself to be bisexual so that her “parents” wouldn’t consider her a “traitor”. Maybe they are not all like that, but the most radical gays certainly are.
That’s what I always think when people say we shouldn’t single out homosexuality because all sins are equal. Yes, in the eyes of God, but we’re not God, we’re individuals, families, and societies. And these other sins don’t have political movements and cultural agendas devoted to their promotion, much less acceptance. I know that they are tacitly accepted in the culture, we can see it in entertainment all day, but at least they’re still considered morally wrong, though Hollywood glamorises them. There’s no political movement devoted to the celebration of adultery or stealing. I suppose they’re already tacitly accepted enough.
A segment of the homosexual “community” is attempting to present itself these days as “just folks”, adopted kids and all. They know their lifestyle has never been considered normal, or they wouldn’t have to do PR to present it as such (and also to give them more access to children either through adoption, artificial insemination, or other people’s, through their “educational” agenda.I don’t know of any groups openly attempting to teach children that lying or adultery are OK, just alternative ways of life.
Love the sinner and hate the sin has no relevance to homosexuals perverts. Hating the sin means hating them because that is who they are
Individual homosexuals are just people with a psychological and spiritual ailment - but when they act on it, they cross a line. Plenty of people may think about crimes or sins that they don’t commit. But the “gay” RIGHTS issue - the agenda - is a whole ‘nother thing.
Homosexuals who want to leave the “gay” life often can, with help. The agenda removes this motive or hope - since it promotes the lie that they’re born that way and can never change. This is an evil lie and many young people with same sex attractoin are ruined by not knowing the truth - that there is hope, there is a way out of the “gay” life.
Also, I do not subscribe to the idea that all sins are equal. Some are definitely worse than others, and promoting them as good and indoctrinating the young is adding a whole other layer of evil.
Just out of curiosity, do you view homosexuals who are not activist the same way you would view dues paying members of the Gay/Lesbian Alliance?
Questions:
In the political arena
What is done with a gay anti-abortion? Ostracized by the conservative/republican party by the anti-gay-ers? What about a conservative abortion rights-er? Same thing? How about someone who is anti-abortion but also opposes all capital punishment? How about a anti-abortion, pro-capital punishment, anti-affirmative action, strong on national defense, free market, pro-Israel, limited government person who is not gay but supports equal rights for them?
How big and who determines how small the “tent” is or should be?
Someone’s gotta decide.
Well, you - obviously.
When you get it all penciled out, write a vanity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.