Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times Wedding Announcement: This IS NOT satire
NY Times ^

Posted on 12/21/2008 9:00:16 AM PST by jackofhearts

...week later they had dinner together, and Mr. Weinstein’s attraction grew in direct proportion to Mr. Perreault’s dining pleasure. “He looked like he was sensually enjoying what he was eating,” said Mr. Weinstein, who is also a food writer. “This was a guy I could like.”...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: gayactivism; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; nytimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last
A wedding announcement in the NY TIMES. It has to be read to be believed.
1 posted on 12/21/2008 9:00:16 AM PST by jackofhearts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts

The NY Times is dominated by an overwhelming number of employees with a massive agenda drive distorted news reporting, and who can only be described as a “Gay Mafia.”


2 posted on 12/21/2008 9:04:52 AM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts
I know I'll get flamed for this, but I think it's lovely they have remained monogamous for 32 years. They're obviously meant for each other and I wish them the best.
3 posted on 12/21/2008 9:05:07 AM PST by Wonderama Mama (Socialism is great until you run out of someone elses money - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts

My eyes!!! I actually went there and read it. Where’s the barf alert?


4 posted on 12/21/2008 9:05:07 AM PST by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts

Staight people are decidedly not welcome as employess of the NY Times.


5 posted on 12/21/2008 9:05:50 AM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts

Makes one think of a splended Auto-da-Fe’


6 posted on 12/21/2008 9:07:05 AM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts

Vomit carnage alert.


7 posted on 12/21/2008 9:07:14 AM PST by JamesP81 (Let the Great RINO Hunt of 2009 begin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

I wa eating....now I have a mess to clean up!


8 posted on 12/21/2008 9:08:13 AM PST by OL Hickory (Where is the America I knew as a boy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wonderama Mama
I know I'll get flamed for this, but I think it's lovely they have remained monogamous for 32 years. They're obviously meant for each other and I wish them the best.

I have a bridge for sale for you in Brooklyn.

The credibility of the Times in this agenda driven in-your-face-assault "reporting" is the same as the credibility of the Times on any other issue.

9 posted on 12/21/2008 9:08:53 AM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wonderama Mama

” Rump Rangers” that are in a relationship do not appeal to me, or any other Christian.


10 posted on 12/21/2008 9:08:59 AM PST by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wonderama Mama
they have remained monogamous for 32 years

Yeah, that's the ticket.

11 posted on 12/21/2008 9:09:23 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body. -C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wonderama Mama

Gosh, I love your tagline. Truer words were never spoken.


12 posted on 12/21/2008 9:09:23 AM PST by NaughtiusMaximus (You'll shoot your eye out , kid! Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts

Ahhh, turd packers. Gotta admire their grit!


13 posted on 12/21/2008 9:09:35 AM PST by dbacks (God help the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonderama Mama

Two men were “meant for each other?” Now I’m sure we’ve reached complete normalization of the unnatural....


14 posted on 12/21/2008 9:10:57 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts
his nude portrait by the painter Alice Neel is part of the permanent collection of the Whitney Museum of American Art.

I will put this on my must see, right after visiting Iran.

15 posted on 12/21/2008 9:11:32 AM PST by razorback-bert (Save the planet...it is the only known one with beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

***Vomit carnage alert.***

NO! NO! NOT NOW! I’m eating fruitcake!


16 posted on 12/21/2008 9:11:46 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (NEVER FORGET TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wonderama Mama
I know I'll get flamed for this, but I think it's lovely they have remained monogamous for 32 years.

Yes, it is nice. However, there's a good chance it isn't true. People differ in their definition of monogamous.

17 posted on 12/21/2008 9:11:46 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts
The best part...at least of what little read...was where they met in a bowling alley while country-and-western music was playing...

I hope they'll be very happy.

18 posted on 12/21/2008 9:14:36 AM PST by Savage Beast ("Your grandchildren will live under communism." -Nikita Krushchev)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts

So stupid. I would laugh at the whole affair of gay marriage but it will likely cause a serious problem in our culture. Just look at how those guys talk in that article. Can people get more shallow than that?

The institutionalization of gay marriage will automatically devalue traditional marriage and the rights of families. We have already seen the total devaluing of pregnancy to the point where a human being has no value at all. Value is only given to the selfish will of the powerful. We’re also starting to see the devaluing of parenthood. Marriage is being defined by the left as a “right” to selfish union rather than an institution designed to regulate reproduction and protect the union between parents and between parent and child. A privilege that has served a valuable purpose for upwards of 100,000 years is being crippled. This nation will soon become worse than any society in the whole history of our species. I for one do not wish to live to see that day.


19 posted on 12/21/2008 9:16:35 AM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
"However, there's a good chance it isn't true. People differ in their definition of monogamous. "

If you mean people lie, then you are right. Look at the number of heterosexual couples who stay together, are considered monogomous, but have had bouts of infidelity. It's a very high number. :(

20 posted on 12/21/2008 9:17:05 AM PST by Texas_shutterbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson