The lies of Lynchburg: How U.S. evolutionists taught the Nazis.

Answers In Genesis ^ | September 1997 | Carl Wieland

[Fichori]

First published:
Creation 19(4):22–23
September 1997

by Carl Wieland

The chilling revelations of a recent television documentary¹ expose the disturbing consequences of evolutionary ways of thinking. Beginning in the 1920s, many thousands of people in the United States were sterilised against their will and without their consent, to prevent ‘undesirable breeding’. Over 8,000 of these procedures took place at a major centre to which such ‘undesirables’ were sent, in Lynchburg, Virginia.

[tpanther]

Does this competency test extend beyond ToE to other venues like radiometrics or geology where current scientific theories conflict with the creation doctrine of some religious beliefs?

Are other "current scientific theories" requiring the courts to enforce them, but not so much the science like the cut of evolution does?

[tpanther]

You think scientists in Great Britain were waiting around to see what a U.S. judge had to say on the matter, or were they discerning the double helical structure of DNA while showing Lamarckian mechanisms to be in error and demonstrating the power of selective pressure?

How very interesting. In 'Expelled' Ben Stein interviewed a European scientist, Polish I believe, that disclosed the cult of evolution doesn't exist in Europe. The only place apparently where evolution has to be enforced by liberal activist judges is the U.S.

IN FACT, they don't have any scientific concepts of such open hostility towards a creator.

[tpanther]

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

How very convenient!

Funny, cause that's all that's regurgitated by the evo-cultists on thread after thread!

[tacticalogic]

Are other "current scientific theories" requiring the courts to enforce them, but not so much the science like the cut of evolution does?

You tell me exactly what you want taught, and exactly how you want the legislation worded to enforce it.

[allmendream]

How wrong can you be?

Evolution is studied extensively in Europe and there are many scientific publications from European Universities published in scientific peer reviewed journals dealing with evolution.

The “cult” of evolution only exists in the fevered imagination of the creationists.

There is nothing “hostile towards a creator” in evolution or any other scientific theory.

[E=MC2]

How very interesting. In 'Expelled' Ben Stein interviewed a European scientist, Polish I believe, that disclosed the cult of evolution doesn't exist in Europe. The only place apparently where evolution has to be enforced by liberal activist judges is the U.S.

Chalk it up as another of BS's lies in "Expelled".

[tpanther]

Chalk it up as another of BS's lies in "Expelled".

Riiiight, all those were just lying actors, except Dawkins of course.

Liberals.

What a joke.

[E=MC2]

Riiiight, all those were just lying actors, except Dawkins of course.

Are you referring to those that were told they were going to be in a movie called "Crossroads" but all the time BS was planning to falsely use them in "Expelled"?

[tpanther]

There is nothing “hostile towards a creator” in evolution or any other scientific theory. How wrong can I be?

LOL!!!!!!

Say tell us again how you reconcile statements like you're a Christian with statements like "fevered imaginations of creationists" again???

No, on second thought nevermind.

[tpanther]

LOL! You’ve not heard of movies’ titles being changed?

Did you see it?

How did you like Dawkins explaining you came from aliens?

[E=MC2]

Riiiight, all those were just lying actors, except Dawkins of course.

Are you referring to the faked Pepperdine lecture?

[Fichori]

“WRONG, I stand behind my initial point as you call it. TOE is nothing without public funding. TOE is a cult funded and paid for by taxpayers, plain and simple. Consequences are always there with anything including the TOE.”

Correct.

Its all about the money.

[E=MC2]

LOL! You’ve not heard of movies’ titles being changed?

The name "Expelled" existed before the interviews and the name "Crossroads" was never registered. Do you fall for all of lies?

[tpanther]

Been there done that.

[E=MC2]

How did you like Dawkins explaining you came from aliens?

I see you are not about the truth but about spreading lies about others.

[E=MC2]

Your lie: “How did you like Dawkins explaining you came from aliens?”

Dawkins own words:

---

The conclusion I was heading towards was that, even in the highly unlikely event that some such ‘Directed Panspermia’ was responsible for designing life on this planet, the alien beings would THEMSELVES have to have evolved, if not by Darwinian selection, by some equivalent ‘crane’ (to quote Dan Dennett). My point here was that design can never be an ULTIMATE explanation for organized complexity. Even if life on Earth was seeded by intelligent designers on another planet, and even if the alien life form was itself seeded four billion years earlier, the regress must ultimately be terminated (and we have only some 13 billion years to play with because of the finite age of the universe). Organized complexity cannot just spontaneously happen.

[Fichori]

“I never talked about proving creation, I talked about falsifying evolution.” [excerpt]

They are always trying to put us in that box.

They know that Evolution cannot be defended, so they try to go on the offensive and hope we don't notice their failure to defend Evolution.

[tacticalogic]

Been there done that.

Where and when?

[tpanther]

Riiiiight.

“Organized complexity cannot just spontaneously happen.”

But UNorganized complexity can?

Get a grip already.

[tpanther]

Are you referring to the faked Pepperdine lecture?

No it was an interview.

You should put down the koolaid and watch the movie.