1 posted on
11/06/2008 7:56:49 PM PST by
Perdogg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Perdogg
Give it up. Vanity record today?
2 posted on
11/06/2008 7:57:37 PM PST by
libbylu
To: Perdogg
Screw history, look at Barack Obama.
Now, can we forget about 2012 and focus on 2010, please???
Sarah Palin should go back to Alaska, act as she were (low key, effective) and build a record of accomplishment.
3 posted on
11/06/2008 7:58:19 PM PST by
Boiling Pots
(Can we go back to hating John McCain now?)
To: Chet 99; DesertRhino; ExTexasRedhead; Frantzie; GOP_Lady; HamiltonJay; impeachedrapist; ...
4 posted on
11/06/2008 7:58:35 PM PST by
Perdogg
(01-20-2013)
To: Perdogg
Sarah is Sarah, the losers on your list, who were they. She has a real job with real responsibilities. Unlike Obama and slo Joe.
When she decides, she will let us know.
6 posted on
11/06/2008 8:00:18 PM PST by
Tarpon
(America's first principles freedom, liberty and self-reliance will never fail.)
To: Perdogg
If Sarah Palin were to run when she reaches Hillary's age the year would be 2024.
She's only 44 years old.
She has many years ahead of her in the running if she chooses.
10 posted on
11/06/2008 8:02:29 PM PST by
hercuroc
To: Perdogg
Well Palin lose a Lt. Gov race (which is kinda like a state VP) and then she won governor.
To: Perdogg
On September 12, 2001 if someone told you that before the decade was out the American people would elect a President with a name like Barrack Hussein Obama, who had a Muslim father and was educated in a madras and raised in the Islamic tradition for a period of time, you would have said “no way!”
History and precedent seems to mean little now days.
14 posted on
11/06/2008 8:04:45 PM PST by
ejonesie22
(Stupidity has an expiration date 11-4-2012)
To: Perdogg
What were Palin’s changes of being a Female Vice Presidential candidate? Let’s see, would that be 2 in how many? There were 72 almost Vice Presidents and 46 Vice Presidents - so 2 in 118 odds??? Yet, she did it. Message in that.
15 posted on
11/06/2008 8:04:48 PM PST by
Blogger
To: Perdogg; All
STOP WITH THE PALIN CRAP ALREADY!!!! Is there some kind of freeper stalking Sarah Palin obsession going on here. Do we have a play misty for me going or what.
CHILL PILL TIME Y'ALL
17 posted on
11/06/2008 8:04:56 PM PST by
Fred
(The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nihilism and Obummer is a WHINING marxist)
To: Perdogg
This is kind of meaningless because most (all?) VP picks are obscure and are of little consequence to the campaign.
Presidential candidates are loath to pick a running-mate who might overshadow them. This is certainly the case with Obama picking Biden.
18 posted on
11/06/2008 8:06:26 PM PST by
Chet 99
To: Perdogg
The road to the White House rarely pans out for any specific candidate. A decent historian could probably name at least 1,000 people off the top of their head who were at one time or another considered to be a serious contender for the Presidency. At any given time, you could consider half the governors, dozens of Senators & Congress Critters, a dozen or so Mayors, and a handful of business leaders / celebrities / public figures.
Sarah Palin might not even want to run for president. She has a pretty sweet deal in Alaska. She'll always be a folk hero up there. In the meantime, she's on the list of contenders.
A big beef about Sarah was that she didn't have enough experience. 4 years from now, she'll have more experience. 8 years from now, she'll have even more than that.
To: Perdogg
Slim to none, she need to work on Ted’s seat!!
26 posted on
11/06/2008 8:09:58 PM PST by
org.whodat
( "the Whipped Dog Party" , what was formally the republicans.)
To: Perdogg
we ( Merican politics)tend to chew people up and spit em out
Why cant there be more comebacks like Nixon?
31 posted on
11/06/2008 8:12:30 PM PST by
woofie
To: Perdogg
Give it up loser.
You backed a loser from the start, why would anyone listen to you?
33 posted on
11/06/2008 8:13:04 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
To: Perdogg
Yeah and no Senator had become president since Kennedy. The funny thing about history...someone, or something will always be the “first”. Sarah has a fine chance of being the first and is exactly what the Repubs need to kick them in the tail IMHO.
42 posted on
11/06/2008 8:20:36 PM PST by
ripnbang
("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject")
To: Perdogg
If Palin can’t be POTUS, maybe she’ll be president of the Republic of Alaska.
59 posted on
11/06/2008 8:31:51 PM PST by
o2bfree
To: Perdogg
61 posted on
11/06/2008 8:32:29 PM PST by
JoJo Gunn
(Stupid people shouldn't breed.)
To: Perdogg; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj
FDR is the lone losing VP candidate to buck the trend, as he made a comeback in 1932 (12 years later) and was elected President.
Sarah Palin has a long political future ahead of her. In 2020, she'll only be 56. She could possibly follow FDR's example, just as GHWB was the first sitting Vice President to be elected President since 1832 (Bush's victory occurred in 1988, 156 years after Martin Van Buren had done the same). She might even pull it off in 2012, if Obama becomes so politically toxic he's doomed in four years.
So while it's unlikely, never say never. I would argue that unlike recent losing VP nominees being a drag on the ticket (Edwards failed to even reducing the Dem's losing margin in his home state, LIEberman turned off alot of Democrats, etc.), Palin was a net positive for the ticket. Her home state candidates (Sen. Ted Stevens and Congressman Don Young) being saved from almost certain political extinction with her running atop the ticket is proof of that.
63 posted on
11/06/2008 8:34:44 PM PST by
BillyBoy
(Operation Chaos - Phase 1: Hillary Phase 2: Palin)
To: Perdogg
Her chances are slim since apparently some republicans are already trying to undercut her reputation.
She's got two chances mouth piece for oil drilling in Alaska and get the public behind her. Or Stevens resigns and she goes to DC and gets something done.
65 posted on
11/06/2008 8:37:08 PM PST by
nufsed
To: Perdogg
Let's make
the RNC Chair.
And what of Ronald Reagan, who ran for the Presidency and lost?
69 posted on
11/06/2008 8:42:59 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson