I be 'hipnotized'
Posted on 10/17/2008 1:01:22 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
THE EVIDENCE IS HERE: This document contains over 60 pages of evidence and analysis proving Barack Obama’s use of a little-known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of “hack” hypnosis on millions of unaware Americans, and reveals what only a few psychologists and hypnosis/NLP experts know.
Barack Obama’s speeches contain the hypnosis techniques of Dr. Milton Erickson, M.D. who developed a form of “conversational” hypnosis that could be hidden in seemingly normal speech and used on patients without their knowledge for therapy purposes. Obama’s speeches intentionally contain:
Obama’s techniques are the height of deception and psychological manipulation, remaining hidden because one must understand the science behind the language patterns in order to spot them. This document examines Obama’s speeches word by word, hand gesture by hand gesture, tone, pauses, body language, and proves his use of covert hypnosis intended only for licensed therapists on consenting patients. Obama’s mesmerized, cult-like, grade-school-crush-like worship by millions is not because “Obama is the greatest leader of a generation” who simply hasn’t accomplished anything, who magically “inspires” by giving speeches. Obama is committing perhaps the biggest fraud and deception in American history.
(Excerpt) Read more at pennypresslv.com ...
When Obama talks, I go to sleep. Proof?
Excellent article. You should post it sepearately, perhaps editing it somewhat to the essential points.
Maybe the author watched CSI last night. Or he watched that Albert Finney flick from the late 70s Looker.
My first thought reading the hypnosis techniques will trigger action on Nov. 4th was, Zoolander and the trigger “Relax” (song).
I am amazed that someone from a service that has done well at understanding the psychology of getting inside someone’s head to defeat him in air combat would scoff at a similar attempt to understand the effectiveness of a political message.
I’m not dissing hypnosis, I’m skeptical of Obama’s use of it.
Lighten up.
Defective gene.
This link leads you to a very long and very interesting read. Do not know enough about hypnosis techniques to know if this is fact or fiction. Never the less an interesting read. If true it would explain much.
As the original article states:
“The only thing you need to do to break a negative hypnotic spell that has been cast on you is begin to think rationally, to begin to think critically. And if you decide that you choose this message as one that’s good for you, by all means sit back, relax, and enjoy the ride. But, if you decide that this is not something you want to have in your life, just simply analyze it, criticise it, ridicule it, and say “Hey, that’s not how the world works.” And you’ll have protected your mind from taking on board something which you really dont need.”
There is nothing tin foil hattish or diabolically sinister about this. The article is just emphasizing that Obama has figured out how to bypass and never address the critically rational parts of the brain of a large number of listeners.
Most of us would agree that that that is the obvious case with his supporters.
Quote from the article:
“However, a very small percentage of the population actually study subconscious manipulation of not only
how people feel about them, but how to manipulate and alter the beliefs we usually come to by our rational
judgment, reason, and experience ... Obama is an expert at this type of artificial manipulation.
In other words, Obama is a typical Demosocialist politican.
I've already edited it to the essential points.
Yay, I called Obama a hypnotist a day or so ago. There’s no way someone with his negative background and lack of accomplishment would have gotten this far without some sort of voodoo worked on his willing and unwilling followers.
I do think there is something to this article. It’s not a tin-foil-hat joke. The author does seems to be qualified to write it:
But I think that such techniques, like all hypnosis, are more influential than compulsive. They can influence someone, but not get them to do something they are strongly opposed to. That may be all Barry needs. We’ll find out on November 4th.
I am not quibbling with your editing. I think it is worthy of posting as a separate article.
Obamunnist vampire:
No, he is just plugging into Satan’s satanic powers. It is more powerful than NPL :)
Of course. That is the whole point. That they are obviously influential.
We can all agree that:
a. 0 has persuaded a lot of folks to support him.
b. His verbal arguments do not stand up to crtical scrutiny. They are logically flawed and inconsistent with enormous gaps. e.g. making ill-founded statements like we are going to spread the wealth around.
So, there is no argument about what he is doing and what effect it is having. The only question is why is he so effective when he should not be. The study of why someone like him is persuasive to large numbers of folks is what psychology studies.
Bump and ping.
“It seems to have the opposite effect on me.”
Me, too. Frankly, my reaction to Obama is one of instant revulsion. Every time I see him speak more than a sentence or two, I develop an immediate dislike and even feeling of physical discomfort. I’m not kidding when I say that this is the same way I felt the one time someone tried to hypnotize me (with my consent).
Maybe it is a coincidence and this is a pile of dripe. However, I’m not going to completely discount it out of hand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.