1 posted on
10/10/2008 8:08:31 AM PDT by
Faux_Pas
To: Faux_Pas
“Seventy percent (70%) of African-American voters favor McCains plan, as do 50% of white voters. “
Oh that is going to hurt.
2 posted on
10/10/2008 8:09:41 AM PDT by
BornToBeAmerican
(Sarahcuda = the dems worst nightmare)
To: Faux_Pas
Nice find. Good post...welcome.
3 posted on
10/10/2008 8:10:35 AM PDT by
jessduntno
(Good Grief.)
To: Faux_Pas
Responsible buyers are opposed.
4 posted on
10/10/2008 8:12:15 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Paying taxes for bank bailouts is apparently the patriotic thing to do. [/sarc])
To: Faux_Pas
Sometimes I wonder how much Sarah personally agrees with McCain on a lot of issues. She hesitated a bit when asked about support cap and trade actions on industries. She also disagrees with him on ANWR. She also was not happy about the pullout of the campaign from MI. I know she’s not going to make a big deal of them, because as the running mate, she has to be the “good soldier,” but I believe some of his stances must get under her skin privately.
8 posted on
10/10/2008 8:13:40 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
To: Faux_Pas
Wake me up on election day. Either way it appears the Republic loses on November 5th. Killed by Democrats, aided and abetted by Republicans — we don’t stand a chance this cycle.
Maybe the next, with fresh conservative leaders waiting in the wings. If Premier Obama hasn’t signed an Executive Order arresting all Conservatives and exiling them to Pockistan.
10 posted on
10/10/2008 8:14:52 AM PDT by
rom
(Cold on McCain '08. Enthusiastic about McCain-Palin '08!)
To: Faux_Pas
Seventy percent (70%) of African-American voters favor McCains plan, as do 50% of white voters.....
Of course.....everyone with an upside down mortgage get in line....all taxpayers will bail you out.
To: Faux_Pas
The bailout package is already rewarding recklessnes, isn’t it?
Might as as well reward reckless joe-six pack instead of the reckless fatcats on Wall Street?
Or am I going wrong here?
14 posted on
10/10/2008 8:18:30 AM PDT by
Eurotwit
(WI - CS)
To: Faux_Pas
Why worry .... it's all Monopoly money anyway.

To: Faux_Pas
I just saw this. I didn’t think it would be a high negative thing. I don’t like it but it isn’t a deal breaker.
17 posted on
10/10/2008 8:19:22 AM PDT by
Maelstorm
(This country was not founded with the battle cry "Give me liberty or give me a government check!")
To: Faux_Pas
HELLO!
I heard something VERY important on FOX last night.
The polls are not only based on polling respondents - they also include the number of new registrations into account.
That means the polls include all the bogus ACORN ballots (and other small, left wing groups doing the same).
If you remove the thousands of fraudulent registrations from the equation, the poll numbers change dramatically.
I often wondered by Osama Hussein Obomas numbers were so high when he appears to be nothing but a body without a soul.
To: Faux_Pas
As long as the Feds can buy ink and printing presses, the Treasury Dept will be able to supply all the money the country needs.
26 posted on
10/10/2008 8:35:36 AM PDT by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: Faux_Pas
Am I the only one who has read the bailout bill? THIS IS ALREADY THE LAW OF THE LAND. IT IS SECTION 109. Neither McCain or Obama has read the bill. Section 109 gives the government the power to do exactly what McCain is proposing.
Seriously, I can't believe no one has picked up on this.
27 posted on
10/10/2008 8:37:17 AM PDT by
mysterio
To: All
Section 109. Foreclosure Mitigation Efforts. For mortgages and mortgage-backed securities acquired through TARP, the Secretary must implement a plan to mitigate foreclosures and to encourage servicers of mortgages to modify loans through Hope for Homeowners and other programs. Allows the Secretary to use loan guarantees and credit enhancement to avoid foreclosures. Requires the Secretary to coordinate with other federal entities that hold troubled assets in order to identify opportunities to modify loans, considering net present value to the taxpayer.
SEC. 109. FORECLOSURE MITIGATION EFFORTS.
(a) Residential Mortgage Loan Servicing Standards- To the extent that the Secretary acquires mortgages, mortgage backed securities, and other assets secured by residential real estate, including multifamily housing, the Secretary shall implement a plan that seeks to maximize assistance for homeowners and use the authority of the Secretary to encourage the servicers of the underlying mortgages, considering net present value to the taxpayer, to take advantage of the HOPE for Homeowners Program under section 257 of the National Housing Act or other available programs to minimize foreclosures. In addition, the Secretary may use loan guarantees and credit enhancements to facilitate loan modifications to prevent avoidable foreclosures.
(b) Coordination- The Secretary shall coordinate with the Corporation, the Board (with respect to any mortgage or mortgage-backed securities or pool of securities held, owned, or controlled by or on behalf of a Federal reserve bank, as provided in section 110(a)(1)(C)), the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and other Federal Government entities that hold troubled assets to attempt to identify opportunities for the acquisition of classes of troubled assets that will improve the ability of the Secretary to improve the loan modification and restructuring process and, where permissible, to permit bona fide tenants who are current on their rent to remain in their homes under the terms of the lease. In the case of a mortgage on a residential rental property, the plan required under this section shall include protecting Federal, State, and local rental subsidies and protections, and ensuring any modification takes into account the need for operating funds to maintain decent and safe conditions at the property.
(c) Consent to Reasonable Loan Modification Requests- Upon any request arising under existing investment contracts, the Secretary shall consent, where appropriate, and considering net present value to the taxpayer, to reasonable requests for loss mitigation measures, including term extensions, rate reductions, principal write downs, increases in the proportion of loans within a trust or other structure allowed to be modified, or removal of other limitation on modifications.
Does everyone see now? It's already the law.
Does it make anyone else nervous that the two candidates didn't read the bill? That the media hasn't read the bill? That apparently none of us has read the bill?
31 posted on
10/10/2008 8:44:50 AM PDT by
mysterio
To: Faux_Pas
People love “free” money. Or at least the lazy or those who ain’t too bright.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson