Skip to comments.
Last veteran of Hood sinking dies
BBC ^
| 10/06/2008
Posted on 10/06/2008 6:10:48 AM PDT by Vanders9
The last remaining survivor of the sinking of WWII battle cruiser HMS Hood in May 1941 has died at the age of 85, his naval association has said.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs; navy; royal; ww2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: indcons
21
posted on
10/06/2008 10:16:24 AM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
22
posted on
10/06/2008 10:17:56 AM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Vanders9
23
posted on
10/06/2008 10:19:54 AM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Tallguy
Hood never had a main belt sufficient to steam in the line of battle against other dreadnoughts, even German first generation WWI dreadnoughts with 11" main batteries firing at WWI ranges at WWI elevation angles of fall.
Hood's only virtue was showing the flag and looking intimidating. It was a good sea boat and a handsome ship, though not nearly so handsome as her predecessor Tiger which was perhaps the handsomest of all the first and second generation dreadnoughts.
Even with the refits during the 1930s, primarily to add torpedo bulges and improve anti-aircraft defense, it never approached the level of protection it would have needed had it been at Jutland!
24
posted on
10/06/2008 10:34:01 AM PDT
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
As soon as I saw this thread, the old Johnny Horton song went through my head. All the boys in school sang it and read the one book in our elementary school library about that battle.
I was the only girl at school who read it too, and was considered "OK" by the boys as a result.
No Cooties-:)
Anyway, I'm glad that Ted Briggs lived to have a long life after this horrific incident.
We will never know what horror these men endured, and can never repay the debt we owe.
25
posted on
10/06/2008 10:54:13 AM PDT
by
happygrl
To: abb
hmshood.
Thanks very much. Very interesting and some good history. I own several books on American BBs. Its interesting that Britain couldn't afford to take Hood in for the two years a refit would take. During this time, the US turned out vessels of endless variety.
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Been a fanatic on WW2 and WW1 BB’s, cruisers, destroyers, etc. all my life. Have a huge library (probably 1,000 books, give or take) on the subject. Several editions of Jane’s Fighting Ships from years ago, plus over 30 years of Warship International quarterly.
http://www.warship.org/
As I get older, I need to find a good home for all these books. Probably will donate them to the USS Alabama in Mobile. They have a library and the guy I talked to said they probably can use them.
27
posted on
10/06/2008 11:28:49 AM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
To: abb
What a wonderful idea. I salute you for thinking of those to follow.
My collection of BB books forcuses on the Iowas and where they went. Did you know there were six Iowas, not four ?
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Yes. Wasn’t the bow of the incomplete USS Kentucky used to replace the bow of one the four? Don’t recall which. Maybe USS Missouri.
30
posted on
10/06/2008 12:23:36 PM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Maceman
31
posted on
10/06/2008 12:26:14 PM PDT
by
D_Idaho
("For we wrestle not against flesh and blood...")
To: Maceman
32
posted on
10/06/2008 12:27:25 PM PDT
by
D_Idaho
("For we wrestle not against flesh and blood...")
To: Vanders9; All
A sentimental favorite of mine:
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b5d8b70471f.htm
We’ve done it. We’ve found her ... H.M.S. Hood found at last!
Culture/Society Extended News Announcement Keywords: HMS HOOD FOUND AT LAST
Source: CH 4 News (UK)
Author: Rob White reports
Posted on 07/24/2001 07:51:28 PDT by Bob Evans
33
posted on
10/06/2008 12:31:20 PM PDT
by
backhoe
(McCain? Fight, dammit, fight!)
To: CatoRenasci
Hood's only virtue was showing the flag and looking intimidating.I had read a comment from a veteran of the Graf Spee that they'd always considered the Hood to be their 'opposite number'. I guess both ships passed a lot 'showing the flag' during the inter-war years. I thought that was revealing in how the German Navy 'ranked' the panzerschiff. Says a lot about how they regarded Hood, too.
34
posted on
10/06/2008 12:31:32 PM PDT
by
Tallguy
("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
To: abb
BB-66 Kentucky was 70 percent completed at Norfolk in 1956, even though her keel had been laid in 1944 and suspended in 1947. The bow section was used to repair the Wisconsin after a collision with the Destroyer Eaton in 1955. The Kentucky was finally scrapped in 1958.
The BB-65 Illinois was canceled when 25 percent complete in August, 1945. Not sure when the Illinois was actually scrapped.
After the Iowas, there was to be the Montana class. Five of these were envisioned but existed only on paper.
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Wore the grooves off this album as a kid.
36
posted on
10/06/2008 1:09:31 PM PDT
by
Skooz
(Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
To: frithguild
Somewhere I have a print of the “Last Moments of HMS Hood” by Robert Taylor (I think), signed by Ted Briggs.
37
posted on
10/06/2008 1:12:59 PM PDT
by
PLMerite
("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
38
posted on
10/06/2008 1:15:25 PM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Tallguy
I had read a comment from a veteran of the Graf Spee that they'd always considered the Hood to be their 'opposite number'. I guess both ships passed a lot 'showing the flag' during the inter-war years. I thought that was revealing in how the German Navy 'ranked' the panzerschiff. Says a lot about how they regarded Hood, too.Hood was quite a bit faster than the German pocket battleships and outranged them. With those advantages, Hood should have been able to sink them handily. While well-enough protected to stand against any 10,000 ton 8" armed Treaty heavy cruiser, and heavily enough armed to sink same, they didn't have the speed to tangle with the later 30+ knot battlecruisers like Renown, Repulse or Hood.
I think the truth of the equivalence was that the ships could project power and clear the seas of London Treaty cruisers.
39
posted on
10/06/2008 1:28:33 PM PDT
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: CatoRenasci
I’m not so sure about that. Hood had a lot of armor plate, its just that it had been added on hotch potch...inch here, two inches there...it all added up to a pretty strong belt, it just wasn’t in the most efficient configuration :)
40
posted on
10/06/2008 1:47:17 PM PDT
by
Vanders9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson