Skip to comments.
Primordial Fish Had Rudimentary Fingers
Science Daily ^
| Sep. 23, 2008
Posted on 09/24/2008 8:57:33 AM PDT by Soliton
Tetrapods, the first four-legged land animals, are regarded as the first organisms that had fingers and toes. Now researchers at Uppsala University can show that this is wrong. Using medical x-rays, they found rudiments of fingers in the fins in fossil Panderichthys, the transitional animal, which indicates that rudimentary fingers developed considerably earlier than was previously thought.
(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: evolution; obsession; transitionalgills; transitionallungs; transitionalsunburn; ucanpickyourfriends
Transiyional forms ping.
1
posted on
09/24/2008 8:57:33 AM PDT
by
Soliton
To: Soliton
Oh goody...another crevo thread. Pass.
2
posted on
09/24/2008 8:59:22 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: subterfuge
Maybe a little off topic, but it looks like FreeRepublic.com got dynamited. Message like “no such thread” appear, and it is impossible to get back to more than about three postings.
3
posted on
09/24/2008 9:04:09 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Just because you are a target, does not mean you have to be a victim.)
To: alloysteel
Data base problem. little men with hammers and tongs on the way.
4
posted on
09/24/2008 9:15:56 AM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: Soliton
5
posted on
09/24/2008 9:16:01 AM PDT
by
Justice Department
("Comedy is allied to justice." Aristophenes)
To: Soliton
6
posted on
09/24/2008 9:19:20 AM PDT
by
Justice Department
("Comedy is allied to justice." Aristophenes)
To: Soliton
Science Daily = Weekly World News
To: Soliton
So does this mean the fingers were part of the design ???
8
posted on
09/24/2008 9:30:45 AM PDT
by
11th_VA
(VRWC Local 2774 - Working to make DC, RAT free)
To: subterfuge
Recently I ran across a thread along the lines of "This is why all FRs scientists have left".
What I cant figure out is why all these otherwise well educated individuals havent come to the same solution as I have...
...just ignore the whole group of nephilim seeking, lost tribe hunting, young earth cretards.
9
posted on
09/24/2008 9:32:18 AM PDT
by
gnarledmaw
(...their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories....)
To: Soliton
Yeah but what about clams having legs?
10
posted on
09/24/2008 9:42:03 AM PDT
by
xp38
To: Soliton
Panderichthys, the transitional animal,
Did Helen Thomas hunt it when she was a youngster??
11
posted on
09/24/2008 9:42:28 AM PDT
by
MaineConservative
(Obama, we aren't electing McCain for president of GEEKS-On-Call, but for President of the USA)
To: SunkenCiv
12
posted on
09/24/2008 9:43:06 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(She's not a lesbian, she doesn't whine, she doesn't hate her country, and she's not afraid of guns.)
To: gnarledmaw
Good way to avoid getting banned!
But I think it is important for anyone reading FR to know that Young Earth Creationism (YEC) isn't the default option of conservatism, and that there are conservatives out there who know and appreciate Science.
13
posted on
09/24/2008 9:45:27 AM PDT
by
allmendream
(Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! RAH RAH RAH! McCain/Palin2008)
To: SunkenCiv
To: Soliton
Yes, but did ancient fish have rudimentary gill-boogers?
...well, they couldn't exactly pick their nose, now, could they?
Speaking of that, it'd be interesting to track the development of the olfactory sense and how it got located in the nostrils -- and how snakes and the forked tongue suff branched off. Except for lawyers and Dems, no other animals have forked tongues.
Cheers!
15
posted on
09/24/2008 9:59:25 AM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: allmendream
I think it is important for anyone reading FR to know that Young Earth Creationism (YEC) isn't the default option of conservatism, and that there are conservatives out there who know and appreciate Science.
Just as important for FR to know is that YECs also appreciate science. Those who practice true science recognize that we cannot scientifically prove that any one position is true until someone invents a time machine.
And I don't think that anyone will invent a time machine, because if were to happen some day, wouldn't they have visited us by now and told us so?
16
posted on
09/24/2008 2:33:37 PM PDT
by
Sopater
(The Left taketh, and the Left giveth away...)
To: Sopater
Science doesn't deal in proof it deals in evidence.
There are multiple lines of evidence from multiple sources that show the Earth and the universe is far far older than six thousand years.
Creation “Scientists” don't actually do any Science, they take other peoples data and twist it to fit into their six thousand year old paradigm. Sometimes it takes a LOT of twisting.
17
posted on
09/24/2008 2:37:20 PM PDT
by
allmendream
(Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! RAH RAH RAH! McCain/Palin2008)
To: Sopater
Science isn’t about truth,it isn’t about proof, it’s about the best explanation to fit the evidence.
But they still go around telling people that they’re wrong when they don’t even know if they’re right.
18
posted on
09/24/2008 7:12:36 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson