Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America - The Right Way! (September 15 - 19, 2008)[Remember the WTC, the Pentagon & Flight 93]
Free Republic; variety of news sources, conservatives everywhere | 15 September, 2008 | Jemian and all Freepers

Posted on 09/15/2008 5:46:37 AM PDT by Jemian

It is time to get things underway.

A very wet Texas is digging out from the damage left from Hurrican Ike. Ike is now over the northeast and is still a very wet storm. Best wishes and prayers to those in Ike's path. As far as I know, we are enjoying a reprieve from tropical storms at the moment.

The NYTs has put out at least 4 stories smearing Sarah Palin. Have they covered the Ayers-Obama relationship? Have they investigated as to whether Nobama is even eligible to run for President? I don't think so. In a non-related matter, stock in the NYTs is at an all-time lo.

Speaking of stock and financial problems, Lehman Brothers has declared bancruptcy and Merrill-Lynch is facing a probable buyout by Bank of America.

We cannot ignore the IRS problems that Rangel is having. Not reporting income from a vacation home seems to be tax-fraud. Is he still active in Congress? Is he a demoncRAT?

There is 49 days left until the national elections. We have some work to do.


TOPICS: AMERICA - The Right Way!!
KEYWORDS: auisnumberone; bluegrassmusic; electionwatch; gardening; health; islam; mohammedanism; navyandburntorange; tobyisback; wareagle; whereisdog; yellowrosesforbit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-384 next last
To: Jemian; lysie; Molly Pitcher; prairiebreeze; bevlar
Since Molly is offline for the moment, would you care for some links?

Obama Tried to Stall GIs' Iraq Witdrawal - Amir Taheri in the NY Post - Nobama tried to conduct foreign policy during his visit to Iraq in July by trying to hold up troop withdrawals so that Bush could take no credit for drawing down

Democrats Hit the Panic Button - Amspec - Just a fun article about the Nobama Meltdown

Democratic Voter Fraud in Detroit - Detroit Free Press - Nobama's old ACORN outfit is at it again

NY Times Calls for Rangel to Step Aside During Ethics Probe -- NY Slimes Editorial -- Yes, they are actually calling for Charlie to resign temporarily as House Ways & Means Chairman or be permanently removed by Pelosi!

Author of Atlantic McCain Article is Outraged by Photographer's Actions -- The Atlantic -- Jeffrey Goldberg on the underhanded tactics and self-absorption of one Jill Greenberg, artiste

Oh, and in re the 'do to war injuries' grammatical mistakes: I lay the blame at the feet of educators who foisted the 'whole-word' spelling approach on unsuspecting grade schoolers for decades. People who were taught in this way simply cannot break down words phonetically. 'Do'='Due'='Doo' as far as they are concerned, just like 'There'='Their'='They're'. I still haven't figured out why these people confuse 'Lose'='Loose' though...;-))
21 posted on 09/15/2008 7:16:41 AM PDT by Bitwhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bitwhacker

Thank you, sir.

You know, you’re one of my top ten ATRW hunks.


22 posted on 09/15/2008 7:22:23 AM PDT by Jemian (Nobama - wants to kill babies & raise taxes; Palin - wants to kill taxes & raise babies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jemian


Awwwww.....you wouldn't say that if you saw me in a speedo...;-))
23 posted on 09/15/2008 7:53:05 AM PDT by Bitwhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bitwhacker

You have just won the “too cute” award.


24 posted on 09/15/2008 8:18:11 AM PDT by Jemian (Nobama - wants to kill babies & raise taxes; Palin - wants to kill taxes & raise babies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jemian
Hey! Out on Drudge they have a story link Obama Blames Wall St. Crisis on Republican Policies, but...guess what???

Here is a Jennifer Rubin article in Reason that reports the facts of Faniie Mae and Freddie Mac lobbying and you won't believe who the top two recipients of the lobbying money are: Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) and...wait for it...none other than Barack Obama (D-IL)! And Obama was only on the committee for 3 years yet he was already #2 on the money list...

So, Senator...what was that again about 'change' and 'standing up against the Washington special interests'??? Hmmmm??? ;-))

(McCain got money from them, too, but only 1/6 of what Nobama got and after being in Washington 20 years longer...how does a first-tirm senator get so much lobbyist swag so fast? He EARNS it....hehehehe...;-))
25 posted on 09/15/2008 8:30:58 AM PDT by Bitwhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bitwhacker

But, you say, maybe all the Fannie and Freddie employees who gave money just “liked” Obama. That might make sense with ordinary institutions. But these two had a game plan to influence and sway lawmakers for the purpose of keeping them on the government gravy train and out of the regulatory line of fire. ...

So it would appear that this is precisely what Obama has been railing against: Washington insiders lining the pockets of other Washington insiders while the taxpayers ultimately have to foot the bill. The Agent of Change, it seems, didn’t exactly walk the walk on this one.

Good catch. We need to bring this out more and more and emphatically.

Sarah was on fire this AM.

26 posted on 09/15/2008 8:38:42 AM PDT by Jemian (Nobama - wants to kill babies & raise taxes; Palin - wants to kill taxes & raise babies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bitwhacker

Thanks so much for the links! The Dem voter fraud one and the one about Obama trying to interfere with foreign relations are ones that (I hope) come back to bite him in the butt!

And, wow, the Slimes even asking for Rangel to step down; we must be in for global cooling as hell freezes over!


27 posted on 09/15/2008 8:49:28 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (Never, ever forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jemian; All
Ever notice how the Gipper's comments seem to be ageless?

“Ultimately, the choice before the American people is the choice between two visions: on the one hand, the policies of limited government, economic growth, a strong defense, and a firm foreign policy; and on the other hand, policies of tax and spend, economic stagnation, international weakness and accommodation, and always, always, from them, ‘Blame America first.’ It’s the choice between the policies of liberalism or the policies of America’s political mainstream.” —Ronald Reagan


28 posted on 09/15/2008 9:26:00 AM PDT by The Raven (50-08 50 States in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative; Jemian
OK, this one is just going to make you mad:

Do you know who Dan Mudd is???

Well, for starters, he is retired TV newsman Roger Mudd's son and a descendant of THAT Dr. Mudd.

But did you also know the following about Dan Mudd:

- He is the erstwhile CEO of Fannie Mae who was the head dude at the time of the $200B bailout
- That even though his salary is 'only' $900,000 a year, he was able to take home more than $40 million during his tenure
- And that even though the employee's stock options and 'investments' are looking like they are about worth the paper they are printed on, Dan Mudd could get up to $9 million as a golden parachute because his departure is not 'for cause'????

This guy lives in a mansion in D.C. and it appears that the collapse of the company he ran hasn't affected his lifestyle one bit. But I have just one question: If it took $200 billion to bail out Fannie and Freddie, where did they find the $43 million to pay HIM for his bonuses and stock options???

Story is here.

Oh, and BTW, this guy just continued the same Ponzi scheme that Franklin Raines and James Johnson -- key members on Nobama's vaunted 'economic advisors' team -- played when they were CEO of Fannie Mae. And these other guys made more than Mudd did (and Johnson moved his traveling grifter show to Countrywide and simply carried on)...

Try not to let your head explode...;-))
29 posted on 09/15/2008 9:30:05 AM PDT by Bitwhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bitwhacker; Jemian; All

Thanks for the info Bit, makes me want to drain the cesspoll in D.C.

Why isn’t all this information on the front of all newspapers across the country?


30 posted on 09/15/2008 9:38:55 AM PDT by NewsBee (This is the day the Lord has made. Let us rejoice and be glad in it!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NewsBee

I am having a hard time posting....maybe it is just my old ailing computer....!!


31 posted on 09/15/2008 9:41:33 AM PDT by NewsBee (This is the day the Lord has made. Let us rejoice and be glad in it!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jemian
WELL! HERE i AM, STORM MESSED MY COMPUTER UP BIG TIME..HOPE I CAN STAY ON WITH YOU ALL.

Not much rain but wind, blew bad and apparently it messed everything up and SIL and the clan were off to FL for the week but I did catch up on some reading, like four books.

I have fought with the horses, one of them has learned to open the gate latch into our fenced back yard and eat everything, dog food, chicken food, plants, flowers, I just gave up but when I put food in their buckets outside the fenced yard, I secured the latch which has served the purpose.

My prayers are with the folks in Texas, I INOW how they feel and we all need prayers for them, they will need them big time very soon when it all sets in as being what has happened.

Just wanted all to know I was not blown away, the kids had a blast at Disney and can honestly say I did not starve to death but it is dangerous for me to take care of fixing MY meals.
Toby

32 posted on 09/15/2008 9:59:55 AM PDT by gulfcoast6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6

Yay! So glad you are ok! We werre a bit concerned about you.

Dog is outside due to bad behavior. I guess I’d better let her come back in, but she had best behave herself.


33 posted on 09/15/2008 10:26:53 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6; Miss Marple; Dog

TOBY! I am so glad to see you. You’ve been gone for an entire week. I was getting more and more concerneder. I hope the horse is okay. They can eat their fool heads up, no sense at all about what is good for them and what isn’t.

Jane, what did Dog do? He’s been naughty? Surely, not our Dog. It must have been some other Dog. He has to stick around. He is starting the thread next week.

I am looking at a squirrel as big as a cat.


34 posted on 09/15/2008 11:00:09 AM PDT by Jemian (Nobama - wants to kill babies & raise taxes; Palin - wants to kill taxes & raise babies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; Jemian; gulfcoast6
Janey, my dogs would love to go outside and stay! They wouldn't see it as punishment....lol!! Loved your kitty cat picture!

Jemian, thanks for starting the thread. Anyone heard from our regulars?

Toby, good to hear you're ok. Even though I haven't posted much lately, I've been lurking!

35 posted on 09/15/2008 11:03:12 AM PDT by Holding Our Breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Holding Our Breath; lysie; kassie; Molly Pitcher

I think lysie is having computer problems and Molly and Kassie are w/o power. The rest are just ignoring me. ;)


36 posted on 09/15/2008 11:19:10 AM PDT by Jemian (Nobama - wants to kill babies & raise taxes; Palin - wants to kill taxes & raise babies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Holding Our Breath; Free ThinkerNY

ROTFLOL! Thanks FreeThinker.

37 posted on 09/15/2008 11:21:36 AM PDT by Jemian (Nobama - wants to kill babies & raise taxes; Palin - wants to kill taxes & raise babies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: tillacum
Here it is: From the American Thinker

It's time to throw my hat in the ring as regards predicting the election results. So here it is: Barack Obama will be defeated. Seriously and convincingly defeated. Not due to racism, not due to the forces of reaction, not even due to Karl Rove sending out mind rays over the national cable system. He will lose for one reason above all, one that has been overlooked in any analysis that I've yet seen. Barack Obama will lose because he is a flake. I'm using the term in its generally accepted sense. A flake is not only a screw-up, but someone who truly excels in making bizarre errors and creating incredibly convoluted disasters. A flake is a "fool with energy", as the Russian proverb puts it. ("A fool is a terrible thing to have around, but a fool with energy is a nightmare".)

Barack Obama is a flake, and the American people have begun to see it. The chief characteristic of a flake is that he makes choices that are impossible to either understand or explain. These are not the errors of the poor dope who can't grasp the essentials of a situation, or the neurotic who ruins things out of compulsion, or the man suffering chronic bad luck.

The flake has a genius for discovering solutions at perfect right angles to the ordinary world. It's as if he's the product of a totally different evolutionary chain, in a universe where the laws are slightly but distinctly at variance to ours. When given a choice between left and right, the flake goes up -- if not through the 8th dimension. And although there's plenty of rationalization, there's never a logical reason for any of it. After awhile, people stop asking.

Obama's rise has been widely portrayed as a kind of millennial Horatio Alger story -- young lad from a new state on the outskirts of the American polity, a member of once-despised minority, works his way by slow degrees to within arm's length of the presidency itself. That's all well and good -- we need national myths of exactly that type.

But what has been overlooked is the string of faux pas marking each step of Obama's journey, a series of strange, inexplicable actions, actions bizarre enough to require some effort at explanation, through such efforts have rarely been offered. It's as if the new Horatio made it to the top by stepping into every last manhole and open trapdoor in his path. And we, the onlookers, the voters who are being asked to put this man in the White House, are supposed to take this as the normal career path for a successful chief executive.

What are these incidents? I'm sure many of you are way ahead of me, but let's go to the videotape.

Here's a young man who graduated from Columbia with high marks, with a choice of positions anywhere in the country. He comes from a state generally held to be a close match to Paradise. One, furthermore, that can be characterized as the most successful multiracial society in the world, with harmonious relations not only between whites and blacks, but also Japanese-Americans and native Hawaiians as well. To top it off, a state controlled in large part by a smoothly-functioning Democratic machine. So where does he choose to go?

To Chicago. One of the windiest, coldest, most brutal cities in the country. One that is also infinitely corrupt in a sense that Hawaii is not. One that remains one of the most racist large cities in the U.S. (Cicero, Al Capone's old stomping grounds, a suburb that is effectively part of the city, is completely segregated to this day.) It would be nice to learn which of these aspects most attracted young Obama to the city. But if you'd asked at the beginning of the campaign, you'd still be waiting.

And what does he do when he reaches the city? Why, he joins a cult. Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church has been turned inside out since the videotaped sermons appeared early this year, without anyone ever quite explaining exactly what Obama was thinking of when he joined up in the first place. Street cred, so it's claimed. But there are a plethora of black churches that would have provided him that without the taint of demented racism that Wright's church offered.

Obama apparently had to swear an oath of belief in "black liberation theology" when he joined the church. (It is the little touches of that sort that make it a "cult", and not simply a "church".) Did the thought of his career ever cross his mind? Didn't he realize that church would inevitably cause him trouble somewhere down the line? That he'd be required to repudiate it and its ideas eventually? We can ask -- but we won't get an answer.

Back at school, Obama got himself named editor of the Harvard Law Review. This is a signal achievement, no question about it. The kind of thing that would be mentioned about a person for the rest of his life, as has been the case with Obama. But then... he writes nothing for the journal.

Now, let's get this straight: here we have one of the leading university law journals in the country, one widely cited and read. Entire careers in legal analysis and scholarship have been founded on appearances in the Review, including some that have led to the highest courts in the country. Yet here's an individual who, as editor, could easily place his own work in the journal -- standard practice, nothing at all wrong with it. But he fails to do so. And the explanation? There's none that I've heard. We can go even farther than that, to say that there is no explanation that makes the least rational sense.

We follow Obama down to Springfield, where as a state legislator, he voted "present" over 120 times. What this means, as far as I've been able to discover, is that he voted "present" nearly as much as he voted "yes" or "no".

Now, statehouses work very simply: a member approaches his colleagues and asks them them to vote for his bill. Some comply, some do not. Some ask, "Is it a good bill?" and some don't. Either way, they customarily, except in unusual circumstances, vote "yes' or "no". All except for Barack Obama. And how did get away with it? How did mollify his colleagues? How did he square himself with the party bosses? Echo answereth not.

(A good slogan could be made of this: "You can't vote present in the Oval Office." I hereby commend it to the McCain campaign.)

We turn eagerly to learn what his term in the U.S. Senate will reveal, only to be disappointed. But it's not surprising, really. After all, he was only there for 143 days.

And there lies one of the keys to Obama's rise. David Brooks pointed out in a recent New York Times column that Obama spent too little time in any of his positions to make an impact one way or another. This is what saved him from the normal fate of the flake: he was never around long enough for his errors and strange behavior to catch up with him.

But a presidential campaign is a different matter. A man running for president is under the microscope, and can't duck anything, as many a candidate has had reason to learn. If Obama is a flake in the classic mode, now is when it would come out. And has it?

The case could be made. Here we have a campaign with everything going for it -- the opposition party in a shambles, a seriously undervalued president, the media in the candidate's pocket, the candidate himself being worshiped as nothing less than the new messiah. And yet the results have comprised little more than one fumble after another.

First came the Wright affair. Obama apparently thought he was above it all -- a not-uncommon phenomenon with flakes -- and allowed the revelations to take on a life of their own before bothering to respond. Even then, his thoughtful and convincing explanation (that he hadn't been listening for twenty years) did little to settle the crisis, which instead guttered out on its own after nearly crippling his campaign. Even months afterward it threatens to pop back up at any time. The latest word is that Wright -- now a deadly enemy of his onetime protégé -- has written a book. I can't wait.

Obama learned his lesson, and confronted the next threat immediately, tackling The New Yorker cover with the avidity of a man having discovered zombies in the basement. A development that could have been defused with a chuckle and a quip (the customary method is for the politician to ask the cartoonist for the original) was allowed to explode into a major issue. The campaign's relentless attacks on one of the oldest liberal magazines extant merely perplexed the country at large. After all, any Republican has had to endure far worse.

Almost simultaneously, the birth certificate saga was unfolding. On no reasonable grounds, the campaign blew off requests for a copy of the document, at last releasing it through one of the least reputable sites on the Internet, and so badly copied that literally anything could be read into it -- and was. I'm not one of those who believes that Obama was actually born in Indonesia/Kenya/Moscow/the moon, but I still have plenty in the way of questions, almost all of them arising from how the matter was handled. Well played.

The latest pothole (or one of them, anyway) involves Jerome Corsi's "The Obama Nation". Corsi has been given the full New Yorker treatment, with the campaign hoping to avoid John Kerry's "error" in not challenging Corsi's 2004 book, Unfit for Command. What Obama missed was the fact that Kerry's major problem was not with Corsi but with the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, who were disgusted with Kerry's hypocrisy in running as an experienced military veteran, and set out to take him down. Corsi's effort dovetailed with the veteran's campaign and to a large extent was swept up with it. No such campaign is in operation against Obama. The smart method of answering Corsi would have been to allow the media to handle it, instead of drawing attention to the book and raising it to level of an issue. This appears to be a real talent for the Obama campaign.

We could go on. The victory tour of Europe, and the speech in which Obama declared himself "citizen of the world", a trope guaranteed to focus the attention of Middle America. His inept handling of Hillary, in which he wound up appearing frightened of the opponent he'd just beaten. Allowing Hillary (and her husband there, what's-his-name) a starring role in the Democratic convention is not a solution any sane individual would be comfortable with -- much less a roll-call vote. This threatens the near-certainty of turning the entire affair into BillandHillarycon, with the nominee winding up as a footnote. But it's all of a piece with the campaign Obama has waged up until now.

We've never had a flake as president. We've had drunks, neurotics, cripples, louts, and fools, but never a career screw-up. (I except Jimmy Carter, whose errors arose from sincere, misguided goodwill.) And I don't think we're going to get one now. Another three months of flailing, incompetence, and a collapsing image will do little to assure voters concerned with terrorism, the oil crunch, a gyrating economy, and a bellicose Russia. (Anyone doubting that Obama will go exactly this route can consider the Saddleback church fiasco, which unfolded as this piece was being wrapped up. Evidently, the campaign goaded NBC news personality Andrea Mitchell into all but accusing John McCain of "cheating" by failing to take his place within the "cone of silence" during Obama's part of the program. The grotesque element here is that Obama's people and much of the liberal commentariat -- including Mitchell -- apparently believe that the "cone of silence", a gag prop for the old Get Smart! comedy series, actually exists and was in use at Saddleback.)

Many of us have dealt with flakes at one time or another, often in settings involving jobs and careers, and not uncommonly in positions of some authority. We all know of the nephew, the fiancé, the boyfriend, whose whims must be catered to, whose reputation must be protected, who must be constantly worked around if anything at all is to be accomplished, always at the cost of time, money, efficiency, and personal stress.

In the fullness of time, we will inevitably see such a figure in the White House. But not this year, and not this candidate. Such acts of national flakery occur only when there's no real alternative. In this election, an alternative exists. Whatever his shortcomings, nobody ever called John McCain a flake.

38 posted on 09/15/2008 11:29:40 AM PDT by bevlar (Always forgive your enemies, but never forget their names :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jemian
Love it!

Jemian, I didn't mean to imply you were not important when I asked about our regulars. I was thinking of Molly's mom and lysies hip....

It's a shame, when he will not not be named but who has a wife in name only surveying the landscape was in office, I couldn't bear to look at his face on tv or in magazines, etc.

This week-end Mr HOB informed me that he could not look at our latest scourge of the politcal scene without the same physical reactions I had years ago!

39 posted on 09/15/2008 11:30:49 AM PDT by Holding Our Breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: kassie

I just got an update from Kassie: I told her we were thinking of her and she wrote back that they are “Ok - no power but we are ok.”


40 posted on 09/15/2008 11:32:32 AM PDT by Jemian (Nobama - wants to kill babies & raise taxes; Palin - wants to kill taxes & raise babies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-384 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson