To: MainFrame65
2 posted on
09/12/2008 10:23:31 AM PDT by
Fatuncle
(Of course I'm ignorant. I'm here to learn.)
To: MainFrame65
Nauru ought never to run out of fertilizer if they do move there...
3 posted on
09/12/2008 10:24:54 AM PDT by
stefanbatory
(Palin/Cleese '12)
To: MainFrame65
Nauru has its appeal: the potash that is its only natural resource comprises many thousands of years of bird dung.
Nauru is also relatively well-off. For that reason, I’d prefer to locate the UN on Tuvalu, which is sinking slowly into the Pacific — apparently due to “Global Warming”. Solve two problems at once.
4 posted on
09/12/2008 10:25:40 AM PDT by
DieHard the Hunter
(Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fà g am bealach.)
To: MainFrame65
5 posted on
09/12/2008 10:35:31 AM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
(~ ~ FREE LAZAMATAZ! ~ ~ [Shipping and handling charges may apply.])
To: MainFrame65
And if the UN insists on remaining in the US,
put them on Alcatraz.
and abandon them.
6 posted on
09/12/2008 10:36:25 AM PDT by
fredhead
(Obama wants to kill babies and raise taxes. Palin wants to kill taxes and raise babies.)
To: MainFrame65
Some good alternative proposals. Thanks.
7 posted on
09/12/2008 10:52:01 AM PDT by
MainFrame65
(The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!.)
To: MainFrame65
8 posted on
09/12/2008 11:16:18 AM PDT by
camle
(keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson