Posted on 09/12/2008 10:20:53 AM PDT by MainFrame65
The UN needs a new home, and the barely-existing island nation of Nauru needs something to do besides selling potash for fertilizer - they have no fresh water, and no agriculture. So I think that it would be the PERFECT new home for the UN. Do you think that if we build it - there - they will GO?
We can only hope.
Nauru ought never to run out of fertilizer if they do move there...
Nauru has its appeal: the potash that is its only natural resource comprises many thousands of years of bird dung.
Nauru is also relatively well-off. For that reason, I’d prefer to locate the UN on Tuvalu, which is sinking slowly into the Pacific — apparently due to “Global Warming”. Solve two problems at once.
I’d favor Mogadishu.
And if the UN insists on remaining in the US,
put them on Alcatraz.
and abandon them.
Some good alternative proposals. Thanks.
a better idea: Zimbabwe!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.