Posted on 09/07/2008 7:13:42 PM PDT by Diago
Drudge is reporting that the New York Times is preparing another Sarah Palin attack: PAPER PREPARES TO FRONT DETAILED STORY ON PALIN'S BABY, NEWSROOM SOURCES TELL DRUDGE... DEVELOPING...
US Weekly recently smeared Palin and was hit with 10,000 cancelled subscriptions. Are there enough conservatives still subscribing to the NYT to launch an effective boycott? Should the NYT advertisers be targeted?
And on a side note, do freepers still subscribe to their local liberal rags just to get the sports page, obituaries and comics?
It is time to stop subsidizing the Democratic Party - cancel any remaining leftwing papers or magazines to which you may subscribe.
She is everything they hate and then add the fact, the liberals loose this election and you say it ‘may not’ be a hitpiece?
Exactly. I keep telling my parents and my in-laws this but they just can not pull the trigger and cancel. They have got to get their daily leftwing newspaper no matter how much it drives them nuts every single morning.
I think its she was given the option of an abortion, and she and Todd considered it, but ultimately decided to have Trig.
A friendly article. Guess Obama DID send out the marching orders.
I was so tempted to subscribe to the Az Repugnant for the Sunday coupons, which could help us stock our pantry, but I just refuse to give that rag even one dollar.
I just can’t believe that even the Times would be willing to give McCain/Palin another 3-4% bounce by printing a negative report about their special needs BABY.
The media seems to have gotten the message, but it's too late. As Paul Harvey says, you can't un-ring a bell.
The media seems to have gotten the message, but it's too late. As Paul Harvey says, you can't un-ring a bell.
If that is all there is, this is thin gruel. And that assumes that this is a Drudge alert which will actually lead to a story, rather than disappear in a cloud of smoke.
By midnight, whatever the Times is printing should be known on the Net. Then we can judge both the validity of Drudge's alert and the substance (if any) of the story itself. I suppose the "story," whatever it is, will be noted on this thread as early as anywhere else.
Congressman Billybob
Tenth in the ten-part series, "The Owner's Manual (Part 10) -- The Remaining Amendments"
If it is a hit piece on Sarah and her family, it'll lead to the Mother Of All Backlashes -- a MOAB that'll annihilate B-HO's campaign.
Robertson was in 1996 and you are correct. However, my prediction about the subject of the NYT piece was incorrect.
NYT article already posted. Guess they are trying to get back on Sarah’s good side.
We've seen dozens of boycott attempts here over the years. They never work. Several years ago, someone tried to organize a boycott of the NBC television network - and their ratings went up.
if they realy really killed a tree to report this. Again, most people either are the product of, forced to get married bcause of OR have a family who got pregnant. Frankly in 1988, how awesome they didn’t have an abortion then...they even had convictions when they were in the 20s.
I like the way you think! Then he can change the name to Trig’s Truth.
When I got pregnant with my 4th child at age 38, my OB-GYN almost had a fit, and warned me that this was a possibility. Fortunately, I had a perfect baby boy who is now a US Marine.
that’s the hit piece? Or is another to come tomorrow??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.