Posted on 09/07/2008 7:13:42 PM PDT by Diago
Boycotts are a tactic of liberals, and they generally don’t work.
A boycott is just too easy for me. I get my sports from Yahoo Sports and Barclay's Premier League and my Comics from Yahoo - featuring The Born Loser in honer of the NYT. I periodically visit the graveyard for the obits. Why would I spend money on a Newspaper just to elevate my blood pressure???
This is the NY Times we are talking about. They may do their best not to do a hit piece, but their true colors will come out. They cannot help it, they are suffering from BDS, PDS, and elephantitis...
Posted on March 22, 2002 1:41:10 AM EST by xm177e2
I think they are going to try to convince people that Todd and Sarah eloped because she was pregnant with Track before they were married.
(Good Lord - it sounds like we're talking about a soap opera.)
It's the New York Slimes. What do you think it is, Palin's favorite cookie recipes?
They are the next-to-the-lowest link on the political food chain, only higher than petitions.
Thanks.
Here is another good one:
Just How Gay is the New York Times? Ask Richard Berke
New York Times national correspondent Richard Berke: “...literally three-quarters of the people deciding what’s on the front page are not-so-closeted homosexuals.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/913302/posts
Yes, we know. It is the NYT. There is no chance of their running any article about Palin that isn't a hitpiece.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment
Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
Well, Vanguard has a lot of my retirement funds, and they are third in line holding NYT stock and losing me money trying to keep these liberal pukes afloat. I’m changing that Monday morning and I’m no liberal.
“..do freepers still subscribe to their local liberal rags just to get the sports page, obituaries and comics?”
—
There is no need to subsidize the garbage coming from the left. I cancelled my fishwrapper subscription several years ago but I still like to hold the comics and sports sections in my hands.
Buy your paper from a vendor or a machine and you won’t be a subscriber - that’s what the NYT and other slime merchants trade on, subscriber lists. That’s how they get their ad dollars. Don’t play their game. Walk to your local machine (free exercise) and put some coins in - you have your paper but they don’t have you on their subscriber lists.
New York Times
By JODI KANTOR, KATE ZERNIKE and CATRIN EINHORN
Published: September 7, 2008
Fusing Politics and Motherhood in New Way
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/08/us/politics/08baby.html?ref=us
Hal, if someone is subscribing to the NYT, they are basically subsidizing the propaganda wing of the far left. I know many people who have figured this out and cancelled left-wing publications they once subscribed to out of habit. Call it a boycott, call it saving money, or call it cancelling crappy publications, but the left wing Times is taking a serious hit:
“it may not be a hitpiece, we dont know.”
—
Right, sunmars, it may be a really upbeat, loving piece on the threat to the NYT’s dreamboy. You, sunmars, should just keep dreaming your way to uranus.
It is my theory posted elsewhere that this is a ploy to keep the paper out of the hands of Murdoch by handing it to baby Palin in a defamation suit.
ROTFLMAO
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.