Cool picture on the link.
OK, so prove it’s not.
Of course? Oh, ok, so a smug and glib ejaculation like this is proof positive that creationists are wrong? Sorry, you do your evolutionist faith no credit. Try offering your own version of what you believe. I bet you you cannot do it.
ML/NJ
Get ready for an onslaught of the Young Earth Creationists.
Excerpt form the article:
“In a new study, anthropologist John Hawks of the University of WisconsinMadison finds that eight hearing-related genes show signs of having evolved systematically in human populations over the past 40,000 years. Some alterations on these genes took root as recently as 2,000 to 3,000 years ago.”
So, this “proves” something? Actually it seems to me it confirms the “newness” of our higher order abilities like language. In fact, this is the whole point of the article. Why golly gee, that seems also to fit the “myth” of creation as well!
A presumption of evolution requires the convoluted explanatiion postulated in this article. Again there are no facts presented, no obesrvations presented, just references to genes. Has anyone ever seen a gene evolve?
What is a systematic evolution? I thought evolution was the name for the supposed system? Evolutionary thinking is so muddled and confused. I really don’t understand how people believe it to be scientific.
YEC INTREP
Obama is all ears.
Sped up? rotflmao
....and this is supposed to be science