Posted on 06/16/2008 9:08:47 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin
In the carnival of San Francisco, the land of gay pride, you will now have the distinct pleasure of driving with your family down a city street, and the car in front of you will be playing homosexual sex acts right in front of your face for all your children to see on one of those contraptions that play movies in a moving automobile.
Right in your face.
Do you have a problem with that?
This is happening now. In San Francisco, and other cities.
We are going to be told that we have to accept this, just like we are already now told that we have to accept loud, extremely loud, RAP music blasting from a moving vehicle, blasting the “F” word from “artists” who bark out about putting a gun into our face, killing police officers, raping and murdering people, and so on.
This is not only legal, it is now a right.
In fact, there is one about murdering a teenage girl. So why not one about murdering a child as well?
There is a monster lurking in our country, and food is being fed to the monster. This monster is the ugly arrogance of unelected judges, who think they are smarter than me, smarter than you, smarter than the citizens.
But they are not smarter than any of us. These unelected toilet people in black robes have no right, no right whatsoever, to take our decisions, our votes, to take away our democracy, the laws we made as a collective society of free people, and then tell us what the law is in their own making.
It is up to us to allow this to happen to us, or not happen.
This ruling is despotic, arrogant, and it isn’t about just one ruling today and not tomorrow. It is a way the monster is measuring us. To see what we will do.
Because what this ruling is about, is what the monster is going to do to us next.
This is about doing injury to our children. The monster is measuring us, to see what we will do if they harm our children in this manner with this ruling.
Once the monster sees that it can do this harm to our children, then it will do the next, and the next. Rights will be for everyone else, but not for us. For example, if we do nothing, then we will be told that illegal aliens have a constitutional right to citizenship. Very soon, we will be told that not only do illegal aliens have a constitutional right to citizenship, but that we as citizens do not necessarily have a constitutional right to our own existing citizenship.
You think this sounds crazy? No. That is exactly how this works, because it is already insane. Next it will be our property. For example, we will be told that private property is unconstitutional. In so many words.
This is about seeing what they can do to us, to measure and then to do much more to us. There will soon be no end to it. Understand? It has nothing to do with “gay marriage”, it has to do with putting us into a box, and telling us what it’s going to be.
They are playing, literally, with fire. You see, nature has a welding torch. There is a natural law, an engine to this. For example, the true creators in this world is the male and the female. That is the law that will always, in the end, burn them all down. Nature’s welding torch is going to burn them all down. In the end, there is a map to the universe which they do not understand. Because, they are not smarter than us. The very fact that this monster would dare to poke at our children revels just how stupid they really are.
Because this is exactly what this ruling is. It is like some stranger, who comes into your neighborhood, and for no reason at all, shoves your daughter off her bike.
That is what they have done. For thousands of years, the purpose of marriage, of society regulating marriage as between a man and a woman, is to protect the children. Love isn’t the reason for the institution of marriage – it is about protecting the children. There are benefits to marriage. Because these benefits are also about protecting the children.
Love really has nothing to do with it. It is part of it, but not the reason for it.
They say, if Fred loves John, they they should be allowed to marry. Because of love.
So Fred loves John. They should marry. And, if one month later, John loves Bill, then the same would apply. John should be allowed to marry Bill. And so John is now married to both Fred and Bill, but Fred is only married to John, and Bill is also only married to John but not to Fred.
Right?
This is just a valid.
In fact, consensual love should not necessarily predicate a marriage if it is about love.
For example, let’s say John also loves the unelected judge who made this ruling.
Then John should be able to get a marriage license stating his marriage to the unelected judge. A consensual agreement from this judge really has no context here, John has every right to marry the unelected judge and the judge should have no say in the matter. This does not mean the judge needs to sleep with John for example, it doesn’t even mean the unelected judge is married to John. No. It just means John has a right to hold an official document that says he is married to the unelected judge. But the judge does not have to be married to John.
Get it? One way marriage. It’s a constitutional right. Because John loves the unelected judge.
And since things do not, should not have to be, consensual, it is perfectly logical that if you love your dog, you should be able to marry your dog. This does not mean your dog is married to you, it just means you are married to your dog.
Get it?
Why are they arresting anyone who has more than one "spouse"? Or for that matter, five men married to each other? For thousands of years, the institution of marriage has been about protecting children. But now, the unelected judges are telling us this is no longer so. That is it simply about preference, and about love.
Well, then a fifty year old man should be allowed to marry a twelve year old boy. Right? If that's the preference. If that's the love. It's a constitutional right.
Or two boys for that matter.
Or his dog.
Or a donkey.
A family is about creation. There is a natural law. That creates a celestial tapestry. Children are important, because they travel farther to the next place from which our forefathers were. With us, into the future, will travel the dog. The dog has been with us from long ago, and as we travel deep into space, into the universe, the dog will come with us. And for a reason - which some do not fully understand yet.
But that does not mean I should marry my dog. I love the dog, and indeed dog is our copilot. Because of this love, I respect nature which created this dog. I respect the laws of nature. I do not marry my dog.
Those who do not respect natural law, will die. Nature has a welding torch. It is creating something. And it will burn all of those down who do not follow the law. They will die wrapped in an enigma. We just have to stand up, to make sure they don’t kill our children in the process.
They have now come into your neighborhood, and just pushed your child off the bicycle. They want to see your reaction. Will you do anything? If not, they are going to come right onto your yard. Then into your house.
It’s up to you.
we're still reaping the whirlwind of idiocy that generation placed before us.
God help our great nation with what will come.
If marriage is defined to be ANYTHING other between a man and a woman, it will legally be challenged to be allowed for any combination and number of humans, animals, and inanimate objects.
The line has to be drawn here, or the coming flood will sweep our society away.
For 2% of the population to demand that the other 98% throw away the central building block of society for the last 5,000 years is the height of arrogance.
When I get a car, if I get a car due to gas prices, I’ll proudly blast some good music, cranking the car stereo.
Good post. Hope you’ll check out mine and share your thoughts:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2032128/posts
That’s what it comes down to. The minority DICTATES to the majority which is absurd. Last times I checked mAJORITY rules, not the other way around.
And BTW, why would the poster actually live in San Francisco? I reside/work in Hollywood, but will never raise a family in this shiitehole.
Come November 4th and the CA General Election
Be there and vote yet again in support of Marriage being between a man and a woman.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2032129/posts
Is it more fun to crank the stereo in a car rather than at home? Is part of the "fun" annoying others? Sounds kind of "liberal"...
“Is it more fun to crank the stereo in a car rather than at home?”
Yeah, it is. Especially when in a liberal part of town and playing a not so liberal song! I’ve gotten some seriously dirty looks to the tunes of “Have You Forgotten?” or “The Angry American”.
Compared to all the house/techno and rap/Hispanic/hip hop music people blast, I’ll get stares when people see me blasting Iron Maiden, or maybe something more tame such as Van Morrison.
How will this kind of news make the USA better respected by the Moslems?
I’d prefer marrying my dog to remarrying my ex...the dog is more human.
Do what I do.
The coronation scene from Act I of Mussorgsky’s “Boris Gudonov.”
(Or we could all don Guy Fawkes masks and play the “1812 Overture.”)
The state has no business getting involved in marriage in the first place. If homosexuals are stupid enough to want to get married, they can have at it. The state does not define morality for you. Only you can do that and only for yourself.
I would suggest a more serious and debatable situation, where you want to marry your male friend and your female friend...a 3-some marriage. I believe we could probably accomplish this type of marriage within twelve months in California...and easily make a point. If you have a 3-some marriage...then why not a 4-some marriage or a 5-some marriage or even a 30-some marriage? Each step of the way...you’d drag the entire deeper into a pit. Then you’d show up with your 14 year-old female cousin and ask that she be allowed to marry you....and they’d eventually have to allow that. We might even be able to help folks marry their imaginary girlfriend. The point made...is that once you start a trend....there is no stopping a trend.
No more laws! Pervert power!
If that's what you want---go for it.
Projection.
Historical figures, strangers, trees, rocks, cities ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.