If marriage is defined to be ANYTHING other between a man and a woman, it will legally be challenged to be allowed for any combination and number of humans, animals, and inanimate objects.
The line has to be drawn here, or the coming flood will sweep our society away.
For 2% of the population to demand that the other 98% throw away the central building block of society for the last 5,000 years is the height of arrogance.
That’s what it comes down to. The minority DICTATES to the majority which is absurd. Last times I checked mAJORITY rules, not the other way around.
And BTW, why would the poster actually live in San Francisco? I reside/work in Hollywood, but will never raise a family in this shiitehole.
How will this kind of news make the USA better respected by the Moslems?
Well no. We can draw the line at informed consent. To enter into a contract both parties must be able to understand what they are agreeing to - animals as smart as many of them are just not capable of performing informed consent.
And increasing the number of people performing in a marriage contract can’t be changed because some things really can’t be split, for example, if we look some guy with three wives, winds up in the hospital in a coma - who makes the decision about his care? What if one of those wives disagree about the treatment?
Me, I’m an agnostic on Gay Marriage, it’s not going to make any difference in my life, and as a Conservative, I really don’t care what two people decide to do with their lives.