Posted on 06/16/2008 9:08:47 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin
we're still reaping the whirlwind of idiocy that generation placed before us.
God help our great nation with what will come.
If marriage is defined to be ANYTHING other between a man and a woman, it will legally be challenged to be allowed for any combination and number of humans, animals, and inanimate objects.
The line has to be drawn here, or the coming flood will sweep our society away.
For 2% of the population to demand that the other 98% throw away the central building block of society for the last 5,000 years is the height of arrogance.
When I get a car, if I get a car due to gas prices, I’ll proudly blast some good music, cranking the car stereo.
Good post. Hope you’ll check out mine and share your thoughts:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2032128/posts
That’s what it comes down to. The minority DICTATES to the majority which is absurd. Last times I checked mAJORITY rules, not the other way around.
And BTW, why would the poster actually live in San Francisco? I reside/work in Hollywood, but will never raise a family in this shiitehole.
Come November 4th and the CA General Election
Be there and vote yet again in support of Marriage being between a man and a woman.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2032129/posts
Is it more fun to crank the stereo in a car rather than at home? Is part of the "fun" annoying others? Sounds kind of "liberal"...
“Is it more fun to crank the stereo in a car rather than at home?”
Yeah, it is. Especially when in a liberal part of town and playing a not so liberal song! I’ve gotten some seriously dirty looks to the tunes of “Have You Forgotten?” or “The Angry American”.
Compared to all the house/techno and rap/Hispanic/hip hop music people blast, I’ll get stares when people see me blasting Iron Maiden, or maybe something more tame such as Van Morrison.
How will this kind of news make the USA better respected by the Moslems?
I’d prefer marrying my dog to remarrying my ex...the dog is more human.
Do what I do.
The coronation scene from Act I of Mussorgsky’s “Boris Gudonov.”
(Or we could all don Guy Fawkes masks and play the “1812 Overture.”)
The state has no business getting involved in marriage in the first place. If homosexuals are stupid enough to want to get married, they can have at it. The state does not define morality for you. Only you can do that and only for yourself.
I would suggest a more serious and debatable situation, where you want to marry your male friend and your female friend...a 3-some marriage. I believe we could probably accomplish this type of marriage within twelve months in California...and easily make a point. If you have a 3-some marriage...then why not a 4-some marriage or a 5-some marriage or even a 30-some marriage? Each step of the way...you’d drag the entire deeper into a pit. Then you’d show up with your 14 year-old female cousin and ask that she be allowed to marry you....and they’d eventually have to allow that. We might even be able to help folks marry their imaginary girlfriend. The point made...is that once you start a trend....there is no stopping a trend.
No more laws! Pervert power!
If that's what you want---go for it.
Projection.
Historical figures, strangers, trees, rocks, cities ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.