Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sex and the City - Freeper Review
My seething mind | May 31 2008 | Moi

Posted on 05/31/2008 9:24:57 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady

I’ve just seen Sex and the City and now I’m going to review it. There will be spoilers. If you’re still waiting with baited breath to see this movie (a description that I doubt applies to many Freepers) don’t read any further unless you’ve already guessed that it’s going to be pretty much like a Jane Austen story but with gratuitous sex scenes, designer clothes, and a plethora of clichéd observations about life and love. In other words, a happy ending, and no one dies.

I should say right away, I was expecting someone to die because I’d overheard a rumor a month ago that the movie was going to have a lot of huge surprises, and it might be that someone dies. So through the whole movie I kept waiting for Mr. Big (who is indeed getting portly) to have a heart attack. Alas, he didn’t.

I should also admit I never watched the series. I saw about five minutes of it once, enough to see that Carrie’s needy pursuit of an unavailable man, Mr. Big, was painful and pathetic to watch, and that Samantha was a trollop. Beyond that I knew nothing, and my friend who accompanied me to the movie had to spend the first ten minutes whispering, “That’s Miranda, she’s bitter… that’s Charlotte, she’s the romantic… Oh, Big has put Carrie through a LOT over the years…”

So perhaps I’m in a good position to assess the movie objectively, as I have no attachment to the characters. This, then, is what I noticed.

1) Superflous designer porn: Many of the scenes were completely unnecessary from a plot-development point of view. They were merely excuses to show the women trying on designer clothes.

2) Artsy shots: Most of Sarah Jessica’s entrances start with the camera on her shoes, then panning up her long, shapely legs until finally… (reluctantly?), settling on her face. Now, much has been said about her face, but really, the only thing that bothers me is that monstrous wart on her chin. I was in the second row, so that baby was the size of my fist. I do not know why no one has taken her aside and said, “Do not give me the speech about how imperfections make your face unique. Believe me, your face is already plenty unique. Get rid of that wart before I take an exacto knife and do it myself.”

3) Reality level: The movie seemed very much one long female fantasy. That is to say, in it, at least two female characters who have been dumped, toyed with, used, stood up, and otherwise treated in a very cavalier manner by the man of their dreams, finally have the satisfaction of having that man come back to them and say, “I was a fool; you are The One.” I’m no expert, but I have observed over the years that men usually know their One way early in the game. They don’t have to tie her to the bumper car of life and drag her behind it for a year or ten. I think they abandoned the “He’s Just Not That Into You” writer and decided that they’d write the script so that he IS into her, dammit, he IS. He just needs TIME. He has ISSUES. He’s SCARED. But really, you’re The One. Really. You are. And when the time comes, you won’t need that designer wedding dress. Whatever.

4) Gratuitous sex scenes: most of them were played for comic relief, but they were so graphic I actually looked away. I mean, the usual sex scene consists of some sweaty flesh and sinous movement, but these were more of the “Ooo, watch the vigorous humping, look at those buttock clench” style that frankly makes your average cinema writhe seem graceful in comparison.

5) The characters themselves: Honestly? The women were kind of irritating, at least to me, because I didn’t have any built-in loyalty. Charlotte seemed like a nice enough girl, but the rest, oy. Samantha seemed like an aging trollop who is putting on weight and getting increasingly crass. Miranda is so unpleasant I couldn’t understand why anyone married her. Carrie is just on camera way too much. Here’s Carrie trying on old dresses and modeling them. Here’s Carrie trying on wedding dresses and modeling them. Here’s Carrie flinging her hair. Here’s Carrie dying her hair. Here’s Carrie with feathers in her hair. Here’s Carrie crying. Here’s Carrie laughing. Here’s Carrie sleeping. Here is Carrie’s 100th close up. Here’s Carrie’s wart. It’s coming to get you.

6) The characters, part II: the men were … well … Samantha’s boyfriend seems okay. Charlotte’s husband didn’t abuse his three minutes of screen time. Mr. Big is now a heavy set, middle-aged fellow who always seems about to heave a heavy sigh, rub his face tiredly, and go to sleep. The only character I liked was Miranda’s husband, a man who had my sympathies all the way through no matter what he did.

7) The End: no big surprises, really. Sooner or later everyone makes up, or makes a decision that doesn’t surprise anyone. All the women try on more designer dresses, hug each other, squeal, drink cosmos, talk about love, talk about friendship, and then run around New York in spike heeled shoes, flinging their hair. Oh, wait, there is one big surprise. Someone poops their pants. I won’t say who, but I will say that I seemed to be the only one in the theater who didn’t think this was uproarously funny. All in all, I give it a C-. In a word, trite.


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Miscellaneous; Music/Entertainment; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: hollywood; movies; satc; sexandthecity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: A_perfect_lady

Thanks for the entertaining review. I had no interest in this movie before, and now I know I would never willingly watch it in a million lifetimes, but at least I got to enjoy reading your review of it!!


21 posted on 05/31/2008 10:30:58 PM PDT by Enchante (Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

That’s a wart? Ewww! Kissed too many frogs.


22 posted on 05/31/2008 10:41:35 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Saw the movie Friday afternoon...I really liked it. It was what I was expecting—weak plot lots of designer clothes and some tears. SJP should have that mole removed and not wear deep red lipstick. The movie was a sumptuous long episode and worthy of my $7.50. I am going to see it again tomorrow with some more girlfriends...this time watching all the outfits and shoes much more closely.


23 posted on 05/31/2008 10:51:52 PM PDT by kmiller1k (remain calm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Hit, hit, hit.

24 posted on 05/31/2008 10:53:52 PM PDT by txhurl (Hirari, Owari ne" ("It's Over for Hillary, Isn't it?"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

You took one for the team. I caught maybe three minutes of this show while going through the channels one day (ultimately, settling on a great episode of Top Gear). I want that three minutes of my life returned to me.


25 posted on 05/31/2008 11:08:52 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

EXCELLENT review. Bravo. You’re a great writer.


26 posted on 05/31/2008 11:28:02 PM PDT by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

Remember when SJP decried welfare reform b/c, according to her, she had family that really needed those foodstamps?


27 posted on 05/31/2008 11:29:42 PM PDT by fightinJAG (RUSH: McCain was in the Hanoi Hilton longer than we've been in Iraq, and never gave up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
I think it looks more like a mole than a wart. Perhaps the truth will be revealed in a sequel.

Great review.

28 posted on 05/31/2008 11:50:41 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
Thank you for a good to read review.

The movie seemed very much one long female fantasy. That is to say, in it, at least two female characters who have been dumped, toyed with, used, stood up, and otherwise treated in a very cavalier manner by the man of their dreams, finally have the satisfaction of having that man come back to them and say, “I was a fool; you are The One.” ... I think they abandoned the “He’s Just Not That Into You” writer and decided that they’d write the script so that he IS into her, dammit, he IS. He just needs TIME. He has ISSUES. He’s SCARED. But really, you’re The One. Really. You are.

That is a very insightful point.

29 posted on 06/01/2008 2:10:23 AM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Fugly as a bag of monkeys... you know whats.
30 posted on 06/01/2008 2:25:33 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

I just saw the latest installment in the Indiana Jones series. < WARNING: Plot spoiler.> The ending was a real disappointment, too; Indy and his cohort live.

Actually “plot spoiler” would be something of an overstatement, in that it is premised on a fact not in evidence, specifically, that there is a plot.


31 posted on 06/01/2008 4:04:01 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Hillary to Obama: Arkancide happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
Great review. Didn't you review that Diane Keaton movie a few years ago? The memory of that still makes me smile and gets me laughing just thinking about it. You trashed the film and at the end were like “This movie sucked!”. LOL!

Keep them coming.

32 posted on 06/01/2008 4:15:44 AM PDT by Vision ("If God so clothes the grass of the field...will He not much more clothe you...?" -Matthew 6:30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Your hilarious review almost makes up for the fact that the most depressing series in the history of television has been made into a major motion picture.

So who poops their pants?


33 posted on 06/01/2008 4:32:59 AM PDT by YCTHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txflake; A_perfect_lady
Yep. This thread needs some serious karma-adjusting!
34 posted on 06/01/2008 5:43:42 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Vision

Oh yes! The Diane Keaton movie... geez, I don’t even remember the name of it, only that I hated it... HATED it.


35 posted on 06/01/2008 6:57:08 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: YCTHouston
So who poops their pants?

I googled and found the answer in seconds.

Click and drag your mouse between the spoiler tags to find the answer.

< SPOILER > Charlotte < / SPOILER >

36 posted on 06/01/2008 6:57:24 AM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kmiller1k
Saw the movie Friday afternoon...I really liked it. It was what I was expecting—weak plot lots of designer clothes and some tears. SJP should have that mole removed and not wear deep red lipstick. The movie was a sumptuous long episode and worthy of my $7.50. I am going to see it again tomorrow with some more girlfriends...this time watching all the outfits and shoes much more closely.

Yes. If you like high fashion, it's a good movie. Well, it's a fashion show with a storyline. And oh yes, yes... I agree with you... she looks ghastly in red lipstick.

37 posted on 06/01/2008 7:00:08 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
then panning up her long, shapely legs until finally… (reluctantly?), settling on her face.


38 posted on 06/01/2008 7:01:27 AM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

I laughed out loud several times reading this. You should do it for a living.


39 posted on 06/01/2008 7:01:29 AM PDT by Doohickey (SSN-681; SSN-671; SSN-669; SSN-712)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

40 posted on 06/01/2008 7:02:04 AM PDT by cowboyway ("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson