Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Windows XP SP3 to hit automatic updates; includes 1,100 fixes
BLORGE.com ^ | April 29, 2008 | Jonathan Schlaffer

Posted on 04/29/2008 7:43:49 AM PDT by CedarDave

If you didn’t have your calendar marked this day (04/29/2008) is an important day; the third service pack for Windows XP has been released to Windows Update today. It may not be trickling down just yet but several sites have already posted manual updates that can be downloaded.

DailyTech reports that Microsoft hasn’t yet posted an official download for SP3 but BetaNews does have a download link that goes straight back to Windows Update.

Windows XP SP3 is more than just a regular Service Pack including more than 1,100 hotfixes/patches which has new features such as Network Access Protection and Black Hole Router detection.

SP3 will also bring new life into the operating system that so many are unwilling to give up for Windows Vista. Windows XP SP3 is roughly a 316MB download and will be hitting automatic updates later today or if you’re feeling more adventurous, can be manually downloaded right now. At least you won’t have to hunt down a shady source for the update any more.

(Excerpt) Read more at tech.blorge.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: lowqualitycrap; sp3; windows; xp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: mnehrling

My suspicion is that it will somehow make it more necessary to install Vista sooner that most would like. It is sad but I don’t really trust Balmer.


61 posted on 04/29/2008 2:00:53 PM PDT by killermosquito (Buffalo (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tomkat
ain’t touching this till there’s some feedback from folks w/sacrificial machines to beta the thing...

Eggzactlee!! Not feeling in the guinea pig mood here today, since we have three brand new XP machines that are running perfectly fine.

62 posted on 04/29/2008 2:26:39 PM PDT by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Time to turn off your automatic updates then

Haven't had automatic updates on for years. I like XP, but do not trust M-slop, as they be real good at fixin' things that ain't broke.

IMHO, Windows Media Player 11 sucks badly, and is a downgrade from 10, so we stick with 10. And we're one version behind on IE, by choice.

63 posted on 04/29/2008 2:30:59 PM PDT by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Crolis
Now my next step is installing Vista on my fiancee’s laptop.

You shouldn't oughta throw out straight lines like that around here.

64 posted on 04/29/2008 2:34:22 PM PDT by LexBaird (Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
I have a question for you, then--I'm running Vista 64-bit with SP1. How do I install VMware Server so it will access the local host?

Which I've already answered previously, you run VMware Workstation instead, just as VMware would tell you if you asked them.

65 posted on 04/29/2008 2:37:33 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Got mine the other day...


66 posted on 04/29/2008 2:48:08 PM PDT by Born Conservative (Visit my blog: Chronic Positivity - http://www.chronicpositivity.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
Hope it doesn’t make it worse.

I installed it the other day; so far, no problems....

67 posted on 04/29/2008 2:49:15 PM PDT by Born Conservative (Visit my blog: Chronic Positivity - http://www.chronicpositivity.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

shut up


68 posted on 04/29/2008 4:01:58 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
Windows XP SP3 is more than just a regular Service Pack including more than 1,100 hotfixes/patches...

Better make that "more than 1,101 hotfixes."

-PJ

69 posted on 04/29/2008 4:10:55 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: ShadowAce

Don’t like it when your pointless question keeps getting exposed?


71 posted on 04/29/2008 5:56:28 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

We had a presentation at the office today from our primary software provider. They said they are having very few problems with Vista, primarily because most of their major corporate users are not installing Vista.

This was part of their answer to our question as to what they were doing about our problems with their software and Vista.


72 posted on 04/29/2008 7:32:56 PM PDT by HangThemHigh (Entropy's not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: HangThemHigh
Vista is marketed as Microsoft's answer to the malware/virus problem, and generally resolves that with a slight loss of accessibility, as security and convenience are inversely proportional. Microsoft just released SP3 for XP, so keep using that if it fits your needs.
73 posted on 04/29/2008 7:39:10 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
"Vista is marketed as Microsoft's answer to the malware/virus problem, and generally resolves that with a slight loss of accessibility"

LOL!

74 posted on 04/29/2008 9:00:22 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Nothing funny about it, every metric out here shows lower numbers of infections for Vista than XP, so much so that malware authors are even changing their primary angle of attack from the O/S to installed apps. Are you saying you’re completely unaware of these facts?


75 posted on 04/30/2008 5:28:47 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Sorry, I am not a 64 bit man. :(


76 posted on 04/30/2008 9:57:22 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
OK, thanks for getting back with me.

Work has decreed that I run 64-bit Vista Ultimate. But I can't get any work done on the VMs because of my issue. :(

77 posted on 04/30/2008 10:30:37 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Your supposed issue is a phantom one, as I’ve said several times all you need is the “workstation” version of VMware, not the “server” version since Vista is a workstation O/S. VMware Player is also compatible with Vista 64-bit. But if you’re hell bent on running an incompatible product in an unsupported mode, you can disable several Vista security features such as requiring signed drivers and internal integrity checks, and possibly get it working that way.

http://communities.vmware.com/thread/81042


78 posted on 04/30/2008 6:00:05 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
sigh. I'm gonna break my rule this one time and reply.

My business requirements are 64-bit Vista and VMware Server.
Not Workstation. Not Player. Not ESX. Not GSX.

VMware Server.

Get it through your head that sometimes we, as employees, actually have to follow the business requirements.

Now stay out of this since you obviously can't solve this issue.

79 posted on 04/30/2008 7:45:30 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
My business requirements are 64-bit Vista and VMware Server.

Well you should tell your business leaders you've learned those are incompatible products. VMware Workstation and VMware Player are VMware's compatible products, which is VMware's decision. Have you not checked with VMware on this yourself yet?

Now stay out of this since you obviously can't solve this issue.

What are you talking about, not only did I list VMware's compatible products for you, I gave you a link for how you can manually disable the Vista security features to run the incompatible server version of VMware if you so choose. Looks like you'd just rather keep complaining though, and you say you're holding up your business over this?

80 posted on 04/30/2008 8:11:01 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson