Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mac: After two months of Mac, here's why I switched
David Alison's Blog ^ | 04/07/08 | David Alison

Posted on 04/08/2008 12:32:33 PM PDT by Swordmaker

Mac: After two months of Mac, here's why I switched

When I started this blog two months ago I began recording my initial thoughts on obtaining a Mac. While I am not a card carrying Mac fanboy (it does have issues like any piece of technology), I wanted to try and summarize why I like the Mac so much now that I've been using it heavily for the last two months.


I have been a Windows user and software developer since 1992, and a DOS user and developer since 1984. I used to hate Macs and as recently as 9 months ago my avatar on one of my forums was John Hodgman (the PC guy from the Mac ads).

Now I really enjoy using my Mac and am drifting away from Windows as a platform. Here's why:

User Interface
The biggest draw for me is the way the Mac UI works.  For me the user interface is about usability, integration and aesthetics.  From a usability standpoint the Mac interface does not force you to see all of the options directly from the surface level. Most of the applications have very light menus and options. Initially I thought this meant that OS X was a light weight - what I learned was that I just had to spend a little time digging and suddenly a much larger number of options were available. UI folks refer to this as progressive disclosure. I refer to it as clean and uncluttered.

In OS X I can pull down a menu and while it is displayed press the Option key and suddenly my menu choices change to reflect more advanced options. The Command key modifier opens up a huge array of options, especially in text editing surfaces. If I want to enter characters outside of what's on my keyboard I have memorable key shortcuts to get to them, like Option-E, E or A to create é or á. Want the Registered Trademark ® symbol? Option-R. In Windows I needed to hit Alt-0174 or use the Character Map application.

This use of the Option/Alt key as a base modifier is a key difference with Windows. The Alt key in Windows is used primarily in short-cuts for menu mnemonics. This is also one of the areas I dislike on OS X: in most editing surfaces I can use the keyboard almost exclusively but as soon as I need to access a dialog window (preferences, etc.) I have to use the mouse. In Windows I have mnemonics to jump between settings or I can tab between controls, moving the focus from one item to the next.

Well it turns out that I should not have been so frustrated by this. Windows users that miss the ability to tab through their dialogs on Mac will find that there is a simple setting that gets almost the same behavior in OS X. I found a great little article by Alex on the Lowe Tech Labs site. If you go into System Preferences / Keyboard / Keyboard Shortcuts you can set the keyboard to work with All Controls. Alex created a nice video that walks you through it. I still don't have the mnemonics I'd like for quick jumps but at least now I can tab through web forms.

Before I got my Mac I was concerned about Right-Click mouse support. I remembered when all Mac mice were of the single button variety and it was something that seemed crazy to me, given the value of having at least 2 mouse buttons. Well, right clicking is very much available and useful on a Mac and in fact I use a 5 button Logitech mouse every day.

On the aesthetics front OS X Leopard is just a really nicely designed OS. Though some don't like it, I love the Dock's 3D look and the "fit and finish" of the surfaces are really clean. There seems to be a very high level of attention to detail in the OS, though I feel someone missed the UI boat on Disk Utility. Even though I think Windows Vista has made huge improvements in the aesthetic quality of the user interface it doesn't have the crisp look that OS X does.

From an integration standpoint Macs have amazing drag and drop support. A good example of this is how I put images in this blog. Very often I will grab an image for a product I am writing about. I simply click on the image in a web page and drag it to my Desktop. Since I use Blogger I click the Insert Image button and in the resulting dialog I drag the image from my desktop to the Choose File button. No navigating through a directory tree to find my file, no specifying the directory I want to save it in.

Performance
OS X runs really quickly on my Mac, a 2.2GHz MacBook. For a 5 pound machine, it rips through most tasks incredibly fast. This speed is apparent in most, though not all, of the applications I run. The well written apps, and that includes all of the ones Apple provided with my machine, are very snappy. I have found a couple of dog-slow applications so it is possible to write inefficient code of course, though they have been very rare for me.

When I started using my Mac I opted to give Safari a try. Safari has been the bane of my existence as a web developer so I was quite skeptical of whether I would be able to use it full time. Though I have Firefox and Opera on my machine too, Safari is extremely fast and it is now my default web browser. Pages literally snap open and large, complex tables render very quickly. The fact that I am using Safari as my default web browser is probably the biggest shock to my system.

The only place where I have seen a dip in performance is when playing videos. The MacBook does not use a dedicated graphics card like the MacBook Pro so when I use Flash based applications or play video the CPU tends to spike a bit. This is only an issue when I am running a lot of applications at the same time though. At any given time I am running a Safari instance with at least half a dozen tabs open, Mail, TextMate, Adium and NetNewsWire. Very often I'll throw VMWare Fusion and a Windows XP VM in there too and it all runs great on this little machine.

The performance issue for me goes beyond just the speed applications run. 

My MacBook boots up pretty quickly, though I rarely restart the machine. I don't restart it because the sleep function is perfect. I've had many laptops running Windows over the years and had difficulty getting machines to actually sleep correctly. Sometimes I'd close the lid thinking the machine was asleep and try to open it later only to find either the battery was drained because it didn't really sleep or that the machine had rebooted when entering sleep mode, requiring a restart when it was opened.

After two months with my MacBook I have not had a single problem with this aspect of the machine. I close the lid and it goes to sleep and uses so little power that after letting it sit unplugged from power for an entire evening I see hardly any drain on the battery. I open it up and within 2 seconds my display is active and about 5 seconds after that it has reestablished network connectivity.

Compatibility
Since I have not been able to move completely to Mac for everything - specifically my development environment - I still need to run Windows occasionally. By loading up VMWare Fusion I can run Windows XP in a window and can load Microsoft Visual Studio and get excellent performance. I can use Unity mode and have Windows applications share the desktop with my Mac applications.

Portability
This MacBook provides the perfect balance for me. Large, bright screen, excellent keyboard for touch typing on, a built in DVD burner and a nice low price. My battery life has been outstanding and with the Sleep capabilities I mentioned earlier I don't hesitate to just snag the machine off my desk and take it with me.

Even the little things that Apple promotes pretty heavily, like the magnetically attached power cord come in handy. When I was out visiting my parents recently my Dad rounded the table and tripped over the cord and it just popped out. No thunderous crash, no bent adaptor.

While my Mac's white surface has been well maintained the palm rests are already starting to show signs of wear. Not excessive, but it is noticeable.

Over the last 2 months I have downloaded nearly 50 different applications and utilities, though that's not even scratching the surface of what's available. The range of applications is staggering and covers just about any category I could think of.

As I set up my Mac I searched around for applications to take the place of my old Windows standard apps and found things like iStat Menus, CSSEdit, Pixelmator, VLC and many more.

When you look at what is included with OS X, especially iLife 08, out of the box the machine is ready to roll. Though it took me a little time I've nearly weaned myself off of Picasa for iPhoto and I'm still playing with iMovie, though I'm more comfortable with Windows Movie Maker at this point.

One of my favorite applications comes with OS X though and that's Time Machine. Seamless hourly backups of my machine that took minutes to set up and just happens without me doing anything. I love it when computers do the work for you.

The Compromise
The closed nature of the Mac means that my choices are somewhat limited, unlike the PC where I can tweak the hardware all I want. Unless I want to violate the terms of the EULA for Mac OS X, I'm only going to be running it on Apple provided systems. I can purchase aftermarket hard drives and RAM to save some money but newer motherboards, processors and graphics cards are off limits. This hasn't been a deal killer for me because the hardware that is provided works really nicely and I never have to worry about driver compatibility issues.

So there you have it. After two months I still find the machine fascinating. I don't hate my Windows XP machine, nor the Vista laptop or Ubuntu workstation I also have at my desk. I just don't use them all that much anymore. 

I'm having too much fun exploring my Mac and scheming to get a Mac Pro.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: Swordmaker

it works. it simply works better.


61 posted on 04/08/2008 9:13:04 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Before I got my Mac I was concerned about Right-Click mouse support. I remembered when all Mac mice were of the single button variety...
...and then, the inquisitors refused to look through Galileo's telescope. ;')
62 posted on 04/08/2008 10:33:56 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Someone who admits in the second paragraph to having an
‘avatar’ I won’t take seriously, whether they like a Mac or PC.


63 posted on 04/09/2008 2:46:56 AM PDT by Looking4Truth (Leave it to some liberal dork to screw things up for the rest of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Paid for by Steve Jobs, Apple Inc.

Yeah, that's it. It's all payola from the deep pockets of Apple, and poor little cash-strapped MSFT can't possibly compete.

(Do I really need a < /sarc> tag?)

64 posted on 04/09/2008 7:54:45 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError
No sarc needed.. This article just sounds like something a lot of companies do on Amazon reviews or Epinions- pose as customers and write fake, glowing reports of why they brought the product.
65 posted on 04/09/2008 7:56:26 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
This article just sounds like something a lot of companies do on Amazon reviews or Epinions- pose as customers and write fake, glowing reports of why they brought the product.

Could it be that it actually reflects he real world experiences? I know it's hard for Windows users to fathom, but for 99% of Mac switchers, this IS how it is.

66 posted on 04/09/2008 8:54:24 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
I know it's hard for Windows users to fathom

I actually use both.

67 posted on 04/09/2008 9:18:29 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr; Centurion2000
If I could justify buying another computer, it would be a Mac. But I'm sitting here, surrounded by 5 systems, 3 of them running VMWare for network simulation, and the only reason that I've got 5 computers in this room is that if I try plugging in a 6th computer, I begin blowing breakers. So the other 6 are in another room. And yes, I'm a Windows/Network Admin too. I work for a company with 120 Windows Terminal Service servers, roughly 3000 workstations, 600 separate locations, and about another 60 Windows (and 1 Novell NetWare) server! If I could justify it, I'd by myself a MacBook Pro and load up VMWare on it for my Windows admin tools.

Mark

68 posted on 04/09/2008 9:58:40 PM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Would you like to see the pile of boxes on my desk of Dell drives waiting for Dell to send the prepaid tags for them?

We had a bunch of 5100c models that all have had their hard drives go out within *days* of each other. Time to death? About 18 months.

I'm not familiar with the "5100c" by Dell, but I do know that there was a known problem with the slim-line mini-tower, like the Optiplex 240 and 260. The cases were designed with too little cooling capacity, and they were notorious for killing the Maxtor drives that were installed. Once Dell replaced them with "server class" drives that were designed to run at higher temps, the problem went away. Dell supplied WD and Seagate drives to take care of the problem. I used to be Dell Premiere Warranty authorized, and my company provided warranty service to a number of our customers. Dell agreed to provide pre-failure warranty replacement drives, because of a very high failure rate. IIRC, I replaced nearly 4000 drives for our customers.

Mark

69 posted on 04/09/2008 10:05:45 PM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
I *was* complaining about the bad design and cheap drives used in the 5100c (and all the other compact Dell desktops).

Is that a Dimension? If so, remember that you're dealing with a consumer platform, not a business platform. The business platform was the Optiplex, and they do use higher quality components, plus they ensure that there is a longer life cycle for driver compatibility.

Mark

70 posted on 04/09/2008 10:08:05 PM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Yeah, it’s a Dimension, but there was an Optiplex model that was its twin except for the trim on the outside. Same issue.


71 posted on 04/09/2008 10:14:37 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Also, it should be noted that the Optiplexes are also using the same cheap, slow awful unreliable drives - unless you pay extra.


72 posted on 04/09/2008 10:15:50 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Also, it should be noted that the Optiplexes are also using the same cheap, slow awful unreliable drives - unless you pay extra.

Surprising, but then it has been about 3 years since I did warranty work on Dells. The Optiplex used to use higher quality parts, as their business platform. Sort of like the difference between HP's Presarios VS their Deskpros.

The Maxtor drives we were replacing weren't the cheap Maxtors. I believe that they were the DiamondMax drives, with the 5 year warranties, but they just weren't designed for the higher temps. Dell replaced them with WD Caviar or Seagate Barracuda drives. I got to be quite the expert at cloning drives with Ghost, and could have the drive replaced in less than 20 minutes, usually.

Mark

73 posted on 04/09/2008 10:21:18 PM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

See my example a few posts up - go to Dell, select Small Business or better, and configure an Optiplex 330.

Check out what they offer as hard drive options.


74 posted on 04/09/2008 10:22:08 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr; Swordmaker; martin_fierro; antiRepublicrat
Looking for some Mac tech help here!

I am trying to record an interview with a person in anther state via Google Talk.
Apparently, Google Talk does not support the Mac OS on its voice calling feature. So my plan was to use my wife's Windows laptop for the Google Talk hookup and feed the audio out from it to the audio in on my PowerMac G5 and then record using Wire Tap Studio, which will record any audio coming from my computer.

Before anyone suggests using Yahoo's voice calling, the other party is in his 80’s and not real tech savvy. I can't ask him to install new stuff on his computer.

I attached the USB mic I had bought for my G5 (before I learned that Google Talk won't work with Mac) into the laptop, and hooked the audio out from it to the audio in on the G5. Nothing comes out on my machine's speakers. If I plug my computer's external speakers to the laptop audio out, that works, although I had feedback, likely because the two machines were too close together.

Any suggestions?

75 posted on 04/09/2008 10:27:03 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

76 posted on 04/09/2008 10:33:00 PM PDT by ThomasThomas ( Sometimes you need to change to remain the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
I'd be interested in finding out the difference between the 160GB and the 160GB high reliability drive is. But they also mention in the recommendations that the 80gb drive has a higher MTBF rating than standard desktop drives. That leads me to believe that the 80gb drive is a "high reliability" drive, standard. But I could be wrong.

Mark

77 posted on 04/09/2008 10:33:46 PM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Try Skype, it works better. Google Talk has... issues, even on Windows.


78 posted on 04/09/2008 11:33:04 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Eh. Dell claims it’s higher, but they don’t say exactly *what* it is or how *much* higher.

Interesting, no?


79 posted on 04/09/2008 11:36:23 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
I guess this isn't really surprising... Let's face it. PCs are "toasters" these days. Everyone is so price conscious that anything that brings the price down a few dollars is being done. I don't know if they're still available, but Dell actually marketed a new line of PCs known as "white box" PCs that were supposed to compete with locally built machines. They were only offered through authorized Dell delaers that could provide services like my company. In order to cut prices to the bone, the only came with a 90 day warranty. There was an extra charge for 1 year, and I don't remember if the warranty could be extended to 3 year.

The biggest shock that I ever had was a meeting with a company that used "big iron." Their data center had a mix of Novell, Unix, and Windows servers running on Compaq Proliant servers, and they also had a number of AS400s and IBM 3090s. During the meeting, the executives were talking about their spending for the next fiscal year. They were throwing around these HUGE numbers for their servers, and even bigger numbers for the "big iron." Nobody blinked when the IBM rep suggested that the company needed to budget nearly a millions dollars just for their support contract. But then when they were talking about ordering another 1200 desktops, they really beat the crap out of the sales-weasel that we had brought along. I guess what I'm saying here is that to many who make the decisions on buying PCs, they're no longer really seen so much as a part of the data processing infrastructure as office supplies. So price has (in far too many cases) become the most important factor. PCs are everywhere, but Macs don't really fall into that catagory, which is why people are still willing to "pay more" for them. For instance, my step mother could have bought a WinXP PC for about $500, including a monitor, but she decided to buy a new Mac for nearly $1500 with the extended warranty and accessories.

Mark

80 posted on 04/10/2008 4:46:06 AM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson