Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When strippers take over the club
Reuters ^ | Mar 14, 2008 | Erin Siegal

Posted on 03/18/2008 8:42:27 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - When dancers at San Francisco's Lusty Lady turned the exotic club into an egalitarian co-op, they found it tough to reconcile their lofty ideals with the aesthetic realities of the sex trade.

One of the first things the dancers did was to toss out rules about maintaining the same body type as the day they were hired, and ones regarding height-weight proportion. A list of acceptable hair colors was scrapped, along with a policy regulating the quantity and location of tattoos.

Now, larger dancers and those who might not be stereotypically "pretty" are welcome on the Lusty stage, but this emphasis on inclusion has brought difficulties for the 60 or so dancer-owners.

The performers -- many of whom take on stage names -- run from tall to short, and thick to thin.

Lilah Mayhem is pale with long dark hair and a thin frame, while Cinnamon Rose has shorter, red-streaked hair and a darker complexion. Wendy works the stage in striped pink knee socks and glasses, while another dancer wears old wedge sandals and a cheerfully curling brown wig. Many sport multiple piercings and tattoos.

After buying the club for $400,000 in 2003, the next step was to put themselves through guerilla business school.

The Lusties, as they call themselves, enlisted the help of other local co-ops such as Rainbow Grocery and Good Vibrations, a local female-run sex-toy shop.

They learned the ins and outs of running a collective business and hammered out articles of incorporation within days.

Seven committees were created to oversee mundane but necessary business items such as insurance and licensing, finance, incorporation, bylaws and media relations.

All new proposals, from bylaw modifications down to buying new carpets, would need approval from general co-op membership and the board of directors. Every worker, whether support staff or performer, had the right to submit a proposal, and decisions would be made by majority vote via paper ballot.

But the theater's mission statement, which seeks to break down hierarchy, made the creation and enforcement of managerial policies difficult.

"It's hard, because we'd elect people to enforce our performance standards, but we hadn't yet decided on what those are," said former dancer Lili Marlene, who was involved in the transition. "Hygiene rules are easier."

Dancers learned how to take disciplinary action against each other via new policies such as peer-based performance reviews. Each week performers evaluate their onstage colleagues, considering general appearances, customer interaction, and levels of eye contact.

The first years of self-governance were the most difficult.

"On a good day, it's like Peter Pan," said Lili Marlene. "On a bad day, it was like Lord of the Flies. We can do whatever we want, and there's nobody to tell us what to do."

(Reporting by Erin Segal; Writing by Scott Hillis; Editing by Eddie Evans)


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Humor
KEYWORDS: coops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: shadeaud
"Reminds me of that commercial where the Russian women were on the runway in their tattered garments. The gals were a tad overweight and stern looking"

In Soviet Russia, runway is on women.

21 posted on 03/18/2008 9:22:58 AM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: najida
I’ve seen bright, warm ‘heavy’ girls bring down a house and a boy-hipped cold chick do nothing.

Ok, truth in advertising. Fat is 5'8 and 220. 'Heavy' is maybe 150, for a dancer under 30.

22 posted on 03/18/2008 9:23:13 AM PDT by xsrdx (Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rednesss

Helen Thomas photo countdown 10....9....8....


23 posted on 03/18/2008 9:24:19 AM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras

HEY YOu!
That woman I know,
I’ve taken workshops with her and she’s a gorgeous peformer...
and a very nice person——

AND she’s worthy of respect.


24 posted on 03/18/2008 9:28:31 AM PDT by najida (My nephew Ethan is here! Another baby to spoil and then hand back :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xsrdx

Depends on muscle and tone more than weight.

Again, I respect these women for trying to change something in a positive way (And I believe they just might).


25 posted on 03/18/2008 9:29:34 AM PDT by najida (My nephew Ethan is here! Another baby to spoil and then hand back :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: najida
So have I. Buxom is one thing, fat and ugly another. But if looks are abandoned altogether, as this story implies, good luck with that.
26 posted on 03/18/2008 9:35:30 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: purpleraine
"Helen Thomas photo countdown 10....9....8...."

Yes, that is what I would expect a woman to look like if a runway landed on her.

27 posted on 03/18/2008 9:36:30 AM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: najida
Depends on muscle and tone more than weight.

Tone absolutely, obvious muscle is generally not attractive.

Everybody has an ideal, but would agree that enthusiasm helps.

28 posted on 03/18/2008 9:36:32 AM PDT by xsrdx (Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

OK,
I don’t see looks as being abandoned at all....just the scope broadened back the way it used to be....

Think back to the the movies of the 40’s and 50’s....you had everything from Audrey Hepburn to Jane Russell to Mae West. And not one was considered ‘ideal’.

The concept of one size or type being perfect is very very new. These women are simply back to the old days. Which is good.


29 posted on 03/18/2008 9:39:46 AM PDT by najida (My nephew Ethan is here! Another baby to spoil and then hand back :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

“Get out there and shake that thang!

F you - I’m on break!”

Okay, that is funny!


30 posted on 03/18/2008 10:04:55 AM PDT by coop71 (Being a redhead means never having to say you're sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Amazing!


31 posted on 03/18/2008 10:06:24 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras

She would be hot after a night of drinking.


32 posted on 03/18/2008 10:30:03 AM PDT by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
The Lusty Lady in Seattle has had day care and a 401K plan for years.

Or so I heard.

33 posted on 03/18/2008 10:35:47 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado; Mase

That’s not a good look for Paul.


34 posted on 03/18/2008 10:37:20 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are goldbugs and protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: najida

Men don’t understand what they want. :-)
Models can look good in stills, but when in motion, they look like that girl from The Ring.


35 posted on 03/18/2008 12:01:22 PM PDT by LongElegantLegs (Kill them with kindness, then taser them for fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: najida

I’d like to watch her dance. Why some guys want only stick-like figures and fake breasts is beyond my comprehension.


36 posted on 03/18/2008 1:05:41 PM PDT by jdub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
ROFL!

Whose been tucking those bucks??!!

37 posted on 03/18/2008 6:09:46 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jdub

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81-AVAMeQIw

Here she is.


38 posted on 03/18/2008 6:09:49 PM PDT by najida (My nephew Ethan is here! Another baby to spoil and then hand back :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; pissant; Xenalyte; Slings and Arrows
Todd, this isn't a subject I associated with you...

Good to see, though.

For the rest of you,

Like, *PING*, folks.

Cheers!

39 posted on 03/18/2008 9:52:47 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mase
Willie.
40 posted on 03/18/2008 10:07:04 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (NAFTA opponents are an odd coalition of the no-deodorant Left and the toothless-and-tinfoil right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson