Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google; AT&T shocked by iPhone usage
ZDNET blogs ^ | 02/15/2008 | Posted by Jason D. O'Grady @ 5:57 am

Posted on 02/16/2008 1:41:47 AM PST by Swordmaker

Search titan Google and mobile phone carrier AT&T have been stunned by iPhone users usage patterns according to reports in recent days.

AppleInsider reports that Google has seen 50 times more search requests coming from Apple iPhones than any other mobile handset. They were so shocked, in fact, that they suspected that they had made an error tabulating their data.

According to the Financial Times Vic Gundotra, head of Google’s mobile operations, said that if other handset manufacturers follow in Apple’s footsteps and make Web access easier on their handsets the number of mobile searches could outpace fixed internet search “within the next several years.”

I know that my Google searches from my iPhone are high because Apple makes it so damned easy. The Google search bar pops up right below (and as large as) the URL field. Why guess at a URL when Google is right there? I know lots of people that don’t even try URLs any more, they just Google everything – even domain names!

Is the address bar doomed?

In related news René Obermann, CEO of Deutsche Telekom AG, says iPhone is driving up average wireless data usage as much as 30 times higher than on other phones. The average Internet usage for an iPhone customer is more than 100 MBytes. Which is 30 times the use for their average contract-based consumer.

AT&T’s announcement of new business and international roaming plans and their replacement of T-Mobile as the Wifi provider at 7,000 U.S. company-owned Starbucks stores nationwide should only accelerate data usage in the months to come.

A quick peek at my last two months iPhone data usage shows that I used 110MB in February and 169MB in January. You’ve gotta love those domestic unlimited data plans!

What is your Google and data plan usage on your iPhone?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: google; iphone; mac; oldbleat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Swordmaker

What in the world is being uploaded to the internet at 165MB?


21 posted on 02/16/2008 9:32:47 AM PST by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
"What in the world is being uploaded to the internet at 165MB?"

I'd imagine photos and videos. I used to laugh at the notion of a camera in my cell phone. Actually, it's a great feature. But sending photos and stuff around does add up on other carriers' plans. This is a big attraction of the iPhone.
22 posted on 02/16/2008 10:02:41 AM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast ([Fred Thompson/Clarence Thomas 2008!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sunnyflorida
The biggest missing feature in the iPhone is its inability to download Rush 24/7 podcasts over the wireless cellular network. This is the show stopper for me.

I would reconsider if I were you. I am a Rush subscriber too and I wish I could download the podcasts on the fly, but I consider that a minor drawback when weighed against all the other great things the iPhone can do.

As you may know, Rush loves his iPhone and just bought a new 16GB model himself.

23 posted on 02/16/2008 10:42:12 AM PST by Norman Arbuthnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast

There’s no video on the iPhone. On mine since last summer I have 200mb in, mostly email and 49mb out.

So that’s a lot of email/photos going out.


24 posted on 02/16/2008 10:58:16 AM PST by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Apple keeps making these stupid over priced products that no one will buy or use.. and they will fail !!

//sarc


25 posted on 02/16/2008 1:05:13 PM PST by RachelFaith (Doing NOTHING... about the illegals already here IS Amnesty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

“In addition, Apple offered it to Verizon first. “

How did that happen since apple dosen’t have a phone that would work on the faster network ?

Did jobs lie to us that the reason they didn’t make the phone 3g is that the chipset uses too much board real estate and battery power ?

Or did jobs want them to expand an older slower network to accomodate his “cutting edge technology” device ?


26 posted on 02/17/2008 8:00:41 AM PST by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RS

No, they offered it to Verizon early, before design was finished - that’s what a lot of handset makers do.

See: http://www.wired.com/gadgets/wireless/magazine/16-02/ff_iphone?currentPage=all

Among other sources, btw.


27 posted on 02/17/2008 9:44:33 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Interesting article, but jobs DID say the reason it dosen’t have 3g ( even now ) is because of chipset size and power demands. It would not be cute enough. Was he telling the truth ?

This article makes the stumbling block to be Verizon not wanting to give as big a piece of the money pie to apple.


28 posted on 02/17/2008 11:12:31 AM PST by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

please, PLEASE

get yourself a Plantronics in-ear bulb sort of headset . . .

Your sensitive brain and those who love you would appreciate the DECREASED [not removed] cancer hazard.

10 min exposure to transmissions caused cells in the lab to move toward cancerous.


29 posted on 02/17/2008 11:15:52 AM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker; All

This is a bit off-topic but I have a question I hope someone can help me with. At work, I exported all of my bookmarks and sent them to the house as an e-mail attachment. When I opend it at the house, they were in Safari. Is there a way to import those bookmarks into Internet Explorer from Safari? It would sure save a ton of time copying them one by one from Safari to IE. Eventually, I want to import them into my iPhone. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.


30 posted on 02/17/2008 12:05:46 PM PST by NCC-1701 (PUT AN END TO ORGANIZED CRIME. ABOLISH THE I.R.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat
I put Mac in that same category. I can make a PC do whatever I please, when I please and buy accessories from anyone I please.

One question... When was the last time you actually used a Mac? Not played with one at a store or just moved the mouse pointer around the screen but used one?

31 posted on 02/17/2008 1:19:33 PM PST by Swordmaker (We can fix this, but you're gonna need a butter knife, a roll of duct tape, and a car battery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701
At work, I exported all of my bookmarks and sent them to the house as an e-mail attachment. When I opend it at the house, they were in Safari. Is there a way to import those bookmarks into Internet Explorer from Safari?

I assume you're on a PC. Safari will export them as an HTML file - open the HTML file in Internet Explorer. If IE doesn't import this format, you might have to use Firefox as an intermediary.

32 posted on 02/17/2008 1:32:40 PM PST by Swordmaker (We can fix this, but you're gonna need a butter knife, a roll of duct tape, and a car battery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Quix
10 min exposure to transmissions caused cells in the lab to move toward cancerous.

Can you provide a link to the research data?

33 posted on 02/17/2008 1:34:49 PM PST by Swordmaker (We can fix this, but you're gonna need a butter knife, a roll of duct tape, and a car battery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I think there’s a thread on FR about it. I could search . . . but so can you. It’d not a raging priority currently.

Sorry i don’t have the link saved in a handy file . . . my old computer bit the dust thanks to Microslop tech support . . . in large part . . . Let me see if I have it in the favorites on my new computer. But I don’t think so.

Nope. Not in my favorites. let me see if it’s on one of my older flash drives . . .

Here’s what I found:

http://cellphones.about.com/b/2007/09/04/israeli-study-10-minutes-cell-phone-use-could-increase-cancer-risk.htm

http://www.techshout.com/mobile-phones/2007/04/only-ten-minutes-on-the-mobile-phone-may-lead-to-cancer-israeli-study-finds/

10 MINUTES WITH A CELL PHONE COULD TRIGGER CANCER

A new study published by New Scientists states that the use of mobile phones for a long duration could eventually cause cancer.

The study which was conducted by Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel revealed that using the mobile phone for a meager five minutes could generate cell growth or division through particular pathways that are often used by cancer only.

Prof Rony Seger from the Weizmann Institute along with his colleagues exposed rat and human cells to electromagnetic radiation of 875 megahertz, which is similar to that emitted by cell phones, but at only about one tenth of the power.

Just within five minutes of exposure to the radiation ended up in the generation of extra-cellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) - natural chemicals that stimulate cell division and growth.

Since the power is low, thereby not being able to produce considerable amount of heat to affect the cells or tissue, the effect was believed to come from the radiation itself, as per the researchers.

Prof Seger stated, “The real significance of our findings is that cells are not inert to non-thermal mobile phone radiation. We used radiation power levels that were around one tenth of those produced by a normal mobile. The changes we observed were clearly not caused by heating.”

The pathways involving extracellular signal-regulated kinases ERK1/2 even though they exist naturally are often used by cancer. ERK1/2 is a naturally occurring chemical that stimulates cell division and growth. Even though activation of these pathways does not always lead to the development of cancer, the effect of the cell phone radiation may perhaps in the long run increase the risk.

In that case one wonders how are there yet so many people on the face of this earth. If such less mobile phone talking can lead to so much damage, then perhaps the earth should be a much emptier place.


34 posted on 02/17/2008 2:22:18 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I suppose we will see when all the iphone users develop cancers in their fingers from all the web surfing they are doing ....


35 posted on 02/17/2008 8:56:02 PM PST by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RS

Fingers don’t appear to be as sensitive to such as brains do.

Your brain is quite significantly electrical along the axons . . . and about the consistency of say jello set about 50-70%.


36 posted on 02/17/2008 9:12:59 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Quix

“Fingers don’t appear to be as sensitive to such as brains do.”

Really ... did the study specifically SAY they were using brain cells ?

Since the cells they studied were presumably floating in a dish, just what type of electrical activity was taking place between them ?


37 posted on 02/17/2008 9:18:45 PM PST by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RS

I don’t recall. Been a while since I read the article.

One of my profs was active in brain research, however. And that was a long time ago. But that’s where I got a lot of my awareness for issues of the brain’s . . . tenderness.

And I have vague memories of much more recent articles about brains.

IIRC, Burt Rutan doesn’t have any electrical anything near his bed—even wiring in the walls. I guess he has a remote for a TV that’s viewed from a shielded cavity onto a mirror.


38 posted on 02/17/2008 9:23:39 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Quix

“I guess he has a remote for a TV that’s viewed from a shielded cavity onto a mirror.”

Too bad light is electro-magnetic radiation ...


39 posted on 02/17/2008 9:34:39 PM PST by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RS

True . . . .

1. You certainly don’t have to believe a thing I write.

2. You are welcome to array all your electronic gadgets on a hat around your brain.

3. I’m not anything close to an electrical engineer. I’m just a shrink, potter, weaver, Believer.

4. I just offer the info for those who care to check it out and be a little wiser.

5. If you wish to be a wisenheimer at my expense, help yourself. I’m cheap, just not easy.


40 posted on 02/17/2008 10:03:06 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson