Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For President, Sen. Fred D.Thompson
01.01.08 | Perdogg

Posted on 01/01/2008 12:50:53 PM PST by Perdogg

We hear every four years that "this election is a critical election". However, this year it is really critical. Compared with the democratic field, the republican field has produced by far the most qualified individuals to be President.

America this year can chose between two distinct paths; American Federalism or European Socialism. The only viable candidate in this election that has promised to continued this Reaganesque tradition is Sen. Fred D. Thompson.

Sen Thompson may not have the executive experience as a Gov Romney, Gov Huckabee, or Mayor Guiliani, but Sen. Thompson understands the true nature of the American political system. He also understands that more government is not the solution and that any one who holds the office of the Presidency of the United States must do so with full conviction and confidence as a conservative.

Being a conservative does not mean adopting conservative religious views, or talking like a conservative, and practicing liberal politics, but instead understanding the limits that are placed on the federal government by respecting those individuals rights that are guaranteed by the Constitution and using those rightful powers of the federal government and the Presidency to run the Executive branch, and by appointing judges to the federal bench that would be truthful to the constitution.

Sen. Thompson realizes the dangers of the Islamic threat from abroad and the need to secure our borders from illegal immigration and is not afraid to face it head on.

He understands the free market, and is not afraid to preach the values of hard work and honest investment. Although we are all sinners, Sen. Thompson has the moral credentials to serve as Commander-in-chief of our Armed Forces.

The Choice could not be clearer; A man who understands clarity of the constitution and a man who is willing to do what is needed to protect this country in the face of Islamic extremist.

For President Sen. Fred D. Thompson.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: elections; fred; gop; iowa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Eddie01
It would be a waste of time.

I have high hopes for Fred in Iowa but will not be devastated if he has issues.

Indeed I am getting a bit giddy. I want something else out of Iowa, and it seems that it is on target.

The Huck/Mitt battle may well have had the effect I was hoping for, and then some....

21 posted on 01/01/2008 2:22:07 PM PST by ejonesie22 (In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

It’s hard to fault Iowa voters for not being on board with Fred Thompson.

Until a few weeks ago, Fred Thompson was not running in Iowa. His supporters here said he was skipping the state entirely, along with New Hampshire.

Sure, you’d love the Iowa voters to pick him anyway, but it’s not fair to blame them for not picking a candidate who has said he doesn’t care about their state.

Now, he’s running in Iowa. But a lot of those voters have already made their choice, and see Fred’s entry into the state to be more opportunistic than representative of a real concern he has for their state. He saw Huckabee take a notch out of Romney, and thought there was a window of opportunity.

New Hampshire’s the same way. Fred ignored them, his supporters claim there are no conservatives living in New Hampshire at all, and Fred even blew off the New Hampshire debate to make his announcement on Jay Leno.

So again, you’d like the NH voters to recognize and vote for Fred Thompson, but it’s not fair to fault them for ignoring a candidate that ignored them first.


22 posted on 01/01/2008 2:28:36 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Rock: you said it about as well as it could be said and not get banned from the site.


23 posted on 01/01/2008 3:06:16 PM PST by RetiredArmy (Better prepare, come Nov 08, we have a Marxist Commissar President and Marxist Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy; Old Sarge
You two can give up, if you like, but I won't. Political spin, backbiting, and fraud have been with us for years. The vote fraud has been more obvious since 1960, but that's only because it was more blatant, and folks started to point it out.

There has been smearing of candidates since the very first contested election. Not everyone loved George Washington, after all. They tried, at first, to be discreet, but in the end were just as nasty as any smear jobs today.

24 posted on 01/01/2008 3:12:40 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
I have no doubt that in TWO years we will not recognize our nation.

That will certainly be true if YOU and others don't try to stop the Democrats from gaining the White House.

25 posted on 01/01/2008 3:14:22 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

I didn’t say one danged thing about giving up. I said what I said, but I never said I was giving up. Me and my wife will vote for a conservative. But, I will not vote for a liberal, either dimocrat or republican. A liberal is a liberal and does not share the values I share. You can vote for whom you desire. I don’t care what you do.


26 posted on 01/01/2008 3:14:24 PM PST by RetiredArmy (Better prepare, come Nov 08, we have a Marxist Commissar President and Marxist Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Right on, big’ol freeper!


27 posted on 01/01/2008 3:15:58 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
Bush isn't running for re-election, so why don't we just let his effect on conservatives go? Let's get our knickers out of their twists, and concentrate on those candidates we have. Some have some of Bush's good ideas, without his bad ones.

I support Fred Thompson, because I think he's the best of the bunch! No, he's not perfect, but then, neither was Reagan. We deal with what we have, and go with the best of those choices. Frankly ANY of them are superior to Obama or Her Heinous.

28 posted on 01/01/2008 3:20:47 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
You mean the fact that many voters are about as dumb as a box of horsesh*t?

I take exception with that. I think that a box of horse turds is smarter that a helluva lot of voters.

29 posted on 01/01/2008 3:21:09 PM PST by cowboyway ("No damn man kills me and lives." -- Nathan Bedford Forrest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01
Do Iowa republicans realize the rest of us are baffled by their candidate preferences thus far.

Frankly, neither Iowa's nor New Hampshire's choices are relevant to the election as a whole. Neither are representative of the country as a whole. They're good media fodder, and that's about it.

30 posted on 01/01/2008 3:22:28 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Thompson and Hunter are the only two in the race that we support. I will not vote for any of the others. A vote for any of them is a vote for the wrong things in my mind. But, I don’t think Hunter is going to get much of a chance. Whether Fred comes through or not is to be seen as these weeks play out. He has the only chance of pulling conservatives together. If it is Rudi or one of the others, the party will splinter all over the place. Many will stay home as they will not vote for a cross dressing, anti gun, pro homo marriage, pro homosexual approving, for the unpremeditated murder of unborn children. No, I cannot vote for any candidate who believes like that.
31 posted on 01/01/2008 3:23:46 PM PST by RetiredArmy (Better prepare, come Nov 08, we have a Marxist Commissar President and Marxist Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Now, he’s running in Iowa. But a lot of those voters have already made their choice,

As of a week ago, it was reported that up to 60% of Iowans HAD NOT chosen a candidate, and were beginning to take a look at the field more closely. Seems like Fred got in at JUST the right time.

32 posted on 01/01/2008 3:24:19 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Considering the fact that the winner in NH has NOT gone on to be the eventual nominee in most of the last few elections, I’d say the outcome of their primary is irrelevant. The fact that they got angry because Fred didn’t come kiss the rings of the GOP leaders there, is indicative of the seriousness of their decisions.


33 posted on 01/01/2008 3:27:57 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Being a conservative does not mean adopting conservative religious views, or talking like a conservative, and practicing liberal politics, but instead understanding the limits that are placed on the federal government by respecting those individuals rights that are guaranteed by the Constitution and using those rightful powers of the federal government and the Presidency to run the Executive branch, and by appointing judges to the federal bench that would be truthful to the constitution.

You are so right. Being a conservative is more than just saying you are opposed to abortion. Sadly, we have our share of regulars who either don't know or don't care what conservatism really is. Incremental socialism is killing this nation. If we lose the White House now, while we do not control either the House or Senate, the left will put their agenda on overdrive.

Fred Thompson is the true conservative among the top 5, is still very much in the race, and he is NEEDED as our anchor for conservative principles during the next administration. Support him now or we will all pay later.

34 posted on 01/01/2008 3:28:27 PM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Thanks, I’ll do just that. ;o)


35 posted on 01/01/2008 3:28:33 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Although we are all sinners, Sen. Thompson has the moral credentials to serve as Commander-in-chief of our Armed Forces.

Uhm... what on Earth does being a "sinner" have to do with Qualifications for Commander in chief? He got a deferment and never served even in the Guard. There are many more candidates who have far better Military qualifications!
36 posted on 01/01/2008 3:37:37 PM PST by RachelFaith (Doing NOTHING... about the illegals already here IS Amnesty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

We in Iowa are not the OJ Jury. We are the most politically informed and active folks in the Nation as a group. We are in touch with the candidates and have touched them personally for generations. The media can lie, their commercials and spin hacks can lie. But, when it comes down to looking them in the eye and getting real answers, Iowans do their job!

Fred has failed muster. And the only place he has any real support is in the very UNREAL virtual fantasy that is FreeRepublic.

Which is why I keep wondering... WHAT yer all gonna do in 2 days when Reality rises up and bites?


37 posted on 01/01/2008 3:41:08 PM PST by RachelFaith (Doing NOTHING... about the illegals already here IS Amnesty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

RF,

Obviously Iowans are picking their candidates on personality and ability to kiss your butt. Well, that’s just retarded. Sorry.

Fred Thompson on ISSUES is the proven conservative. Iowans don’t hold a candle to Freepers in terms of political knowledge, that is painfully apparent. Iowa gets spun.

Why don’t Iowans... a... pick up a computer and search candidate positions, look closely at their past like we do instead of voting based on a wink and a smile - or - have Iowa Republicans done their homework and are in the process of supporting a new republican platform that incorporates liberal planks.

If Fred does “poorly” in Iowa, I WILL equate Iowa to O.J. Jurors and lose all faith in Iowa as a primary state. You guys need to step it up.


38 posted on 01/01/2008 4:22:42 PM PST by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith
"Iowans do their job!"

Maybe some Iowans do their job, but you've missed it.

39 posted on 01/01/2008 5:22:32 PM PST by daylilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

FRed himself needs to convince the voters.


40 posted on 01/01/2008 5:28:52 PM PST by La Enchiladita (And His Name shall be called Wonderful-Counselor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson