Skip to comments.
February 5, 2003: Fatal Attraction (Farah says killing a cheating spouse is good)
WND ^
| February 5, 2003
| Farah
Posted on 12/30/2007 11:47:36 AM PST by Robbin
I was thinking about the impact of this movie again while pondering Clara Harris, the Texas woman on trial for murdering her unfaithful dog of a husband. I've taken a lot of heat for suggesting Clara Harris should not only be freed, but be given a medal for running over her lying, cheating spouse. I guess some of my readers just don't get the point.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: adultery; farah; josephfarah; notfarahfawcett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
I was called insane for suggesting Farah was a Kook because he advocated the death penalty for adultery. I couldn't find that article, thou I read it myself so I know what he said, but I found one where he He would not only Free a woman who murdered her cheating husband, but give her a medal. Fundamentally the same think I think ...
1
posted on
12/30/2007 11:47:37 AM PST
by
Robbin
To: Robbin
"Off with his head!"
2
posted on
12/30/2007 11:49:49 AM PST
by
jdm
To: Robbin
Nobody in his right mind wanted to end up like the Michael Douglas character in "Fatal Attraction."As I recall the movie - it was a pretty 'happy ending' for Douglas' character.
3
posted on
12/30/2007 11:50:49 AM PST
by
mbraynard
(Tagline changed due to admin request)
To: Robbin
Perhaps the woman’s actions provide a clue as to why her husband found it difficult to remain honest, and truthful to her.
To: Robbin
Death for adultery? Kill 33% (or more of men) and 25% (or more) of women?
5
posted on
12/30/2007 11:52:47 AM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
(Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
To: Robbin
Ya gotta admit, it’s not a bad idea if applied to Bill Clinton.
6
posted on
12/30/2007 11:54:42 AM PST
by
AuntB
(" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
To: Robbin
I don’t know that it’s good, exactly, but it’s probably satisfying.
7
posted on
12/30/2007 11:56:03 AM PST
by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich!)
To: jdm
“Rode hard and put away wet...”
8
posted on
12/30/2007 11:56:05 AM PST
by
rlmorel
(Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
To: Robbin
I think Farah is right in pointing out how adultery is evil, but he’s way, WAY off base in saying it justifies murder. People who cheat on their spouses deserve scorn, not death.
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Perhaps the womans actions provide a clue as to why her husband found it difficult to remain honest, and truthful to her.BINGO
10
posted on
12/30/2007 11:57:50 AM PST
by
maine-iac7
(",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
To: Robbin
His point is there was a time in this country where such a man would have been at least tarred and feathered, if not hung, for doing what he did.
Today, a spouse can lie, cheat, and steal, while committing adultery, then shack up with his/her paramour, and expect 50% of the property, and equal custody of the kids....
As a culture we give ZERO consequences to persons who by basic human standards should at least be shunned from normal society, if not worse. In many ways we are a people who has abandoned justice.
Did she have a right to take the law in her own hands? No. However, this is an area now, entirely lawless in America—and arguably the adulterer did get what he deserved.
To: Robbin
because he advocated
I know what he said
He would not only Free a woman
Umm. You are aware that Farah is very much a woman?
12
posted on
12/30/2007 11:59:40 AM PST
by
bill1952
(The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
To: Robbin
I’ll go along with death for cheating as long as there is also death for refusing to have sex with your spouse.
To: Robbin
She isn’t in prison because she killed her husband. She’s in prison because she ran over him 3 times, and made his daughter watch.
If you shoot a cheating spouse, caught in the act in Texas, there’s a fair chance you won’t do hard time.
14
posted on
12/30/2007 12:01:08 PM PST
by
PAR35
To: AnalogReigns
>and arguably the adulterer did get what he deserved.
Uh huh.
15
posted on
12/30/2007 12:01:45 PM PST
by
bill1952
(The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
To: Gay State Conservative
Murder is far worse than adultery. Each crime should not carry the same penalty nor should one justify the other.
16
posted on
12/30/2007 12:02:59 PM PST
by
Loud Mime
(Things were better when cigarette companies could advertise and lawyers could not.)
To: bill1952
You are aware that Farah is very much a woman?He has a pretty big moustache in his picture at the link. Care to reconsider your position? http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30879
17
posted on
12/30/2007 12:03:29 PM PST
by
PAR35
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Perhaps the womans actions provide a clue as to why her husband found it difficult to remain honest, and truthful to her. Reading your post, why did Hillary pop to mind?
18
posted on
12/30/2007 12:03:52 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: bill1952
ugliest......woman.......ever
To: Robbin
It certainly isn't something that should be legally sanctioned. Murder, even for adultery, should be met with incarceration for a long time - but I will always reserve sympathy for such a murderer.
For another example, if someone harmed my wife or kids, and I had the opportunity to enact vengeance, I could imagine doing so AND accepting the legal penalty (for murder/torture/whatever). I know, 'two wrongs don't make a right'. Yeah yeah.
20
posted on
12/30/2007 12:06:21 PM PST
by
M203M4
(True Universal Suffrage: Pets of dead illegal-immigrant felons voting Democrat (twice))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson