Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple’s rising popularity lures hackers
Financial Times ^ | Dec 5, 2007 | Kevin Allison

Posted on 12/06/2007 9:59:43 AM PST by driftdiver

After years of relative safety, the Apple Mac is becoming an increasingly tempting target for malicious computer hackers, according to a new report published this week.

Security researchers have been aware of the threat to Apple since last year, when they detected the first piece of malicious code – or “malware” – specifically designed to target Apple.

Over the past few months, however, the number of malicious programmes has increased, according to a report published this week by F-Secure, an internet security company.

“Over the past two years, we had found one or two pieces of malware targeting Macs,” said Patrik Runald, an F-Secure security researcher. “Since October, we’ve found 100-150 variants.”

(Excerpt) Read more at ft.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: apple; hacker; microsoft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-142 next last
To: DallasMike

“I don’t know why people have these stupid Mac vs. PC vs. (U)nix wars. The only thing I care about is that Apple stock has been very, very, very good for me over this past year.”

Cause its fun and brings out the inner geek. Again the only reason I like to throw darts at MAC is due to their commercials. Their elitist attitude is annoying.

Congrats on your wise investing. From what I know their rise is mostly due to success of the iPod.


61 posted on 12/06/2007 10:55:15 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Still not a threat. The very architecture of UNIX makes it impossible for malware to run without user permission being granted.And there is no registry to write to, unlike in Windows.

No just plain text files which I actually love.

62 posted on 12/06/2007 10:57:38 AM PST by Lx ((Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gjones77
And as for hacking, yes, yes they can be hacked, why else would Apple issue over 35 security updates, to plug security holes that can allow a hacker to get access to the system.

Standard security updates. If they're so easy to hack, why haven't Mac owners had more problems with being hacked? That province seems to belong almost exclusively to Windows platforms.
63 posted on 12/06/2007 10:58:54 AM PST by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Ahh I see you are discriminating against me.

We're not discriminating against Mac-haters personally. We're discriminating against the low-quality products designed by Mac-haters.

64 posted on 12/06/2007 11:00:15 AM PST by HAL9000 (Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

“If they’re so easy to hack, why haven’t Mac owners had more problems with being hacked?”

Because so few people use MACs that the ROI is not adequate. Most hackers are in it or the money.


65 posted on 12/06/2007 11:01:32 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
If I want a unix variant I’ll build a Linux box. Its a lot cheaper and doesn’t feed the liberal mill that Apple is.

You might want to look up exactly what political persuasion Linus Torvalus (sp??) is.

66 posted on 12/06/2007 11:03:01 AM PST by Lx ((Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Lx

“You might want to look up exactly what political persuasion Linus Torvalus (sp??) is.”

No I refuse to have my bubble burst. Judging where he’s from theres really little doubt. The whole model of Linux is also a help. Nobody owns it, its a collective.


67 posted on 12/06/2007 11:04:22 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Actually, I just looked him up and I couldn’t even find a picture of him with Stalin. He seems to be a low profile guy, maybe he’s just a geek.


68 posted on 12/06/2007 11:08:14 AM PST by Lx ((Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

“We’re not discriminating against Mac-haters personally. We’re discriminating against the low-quality products designed by Mac-haters.”

Low quality? you must be talking about my competition. :) I’m a firm believer in the free market. MS is the best because they’ve captured the market. They’ll continue to lead the market as long as they are the best.


69 posted on 12/06/2007 11:09:44 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Is someone coordinating the FUD? This is the second article like this today. Maybe it’s a slow news day so they have to recycle four-year old articles saying “The Mac Hack Attack is Coming Soon!”


70 posted on 12/06/2007 11:20:56 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lx

He’s very apolitical. His father’s persuasions’ ruined politics for him.


71 posted on 12/06/2007 11:22:00 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Stop saying that..

Any system can be rooted, there is a bug out there which can and will root a box...

That being said Unix does have far superior security to the NT world..


72 posted on 12/06/2007 11:22:03 AM PST by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

“Maybe it’s a slow news day so they have to recycle four-year old articles saying “

Nope this is a new article. Musta been wishful thinking.


73 posted on 12/06/2007 11:24:53 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
I don’t really have a dog in this fight. I just don’t care for zealots on either side of this. Micro$ofties, and Apple zealots are both a bit much for me to take.

Why then are you even viewing the thread, much less participating in the discussion?

74 posted on 12/06/2007 11:30:22 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: Mind-numbed Robot

“Why then are you even viewing the thread, much less participating in the discussion?”

You know the saying about no such thing as a stupid question... seems you’ve managed to go against conventional wisdom.

Try this: curiousity. How about this: I work with computers for a living and like to see what’s said. Or even: I may learn something.

Are you suggesting that I have to pick a side to read this thread?


76 posted on 12/06/2007 11:38:15 AM PST by brownsfan (America has "jumped the shark")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Nope this is a new article. Musta been wishful thinking.

So they make a few changes before reposting. They're all in the same line every year, "The Mac's getting more popular, so there will be viruses in the wild soon!" I guess they're not selling enough Mac antivirus products.

77 posted on 12/06/2007 11:43:01 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Nor will it exist, due to the fundamental nature of the underlying UNIX architecture of the OSX operating system.

It's happened before in the UNIX world, and it could happen again. The last big one I remember was Sadmind for Solaris several years ago, but they'd had a security patch out for about a year and a half before the worm appeared.

78 posted on 12/06/2007 11:52:00 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gjones77
You’ll have to excuse members of The Cult of Mac, they’re ignorant to anything outside of their pretty Apple products and don’t realize that OS X isn’t even based on Unix, but a BSD derivative.

The histories of BSD and UNIX (AT&T) are heavily intertwined. Besides, Apple is one of only a few companies that can claim UNIX 03 certification and actually call their product by the trademark "UNIX." By the one true legal definition, OS X Leopard is UNIX.

79 posted on 12/06/2007 11:56:13 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Apple makes pretty products that work pretty well among themselves. Interoperability is a challenge

Networking my Mac to my PC for printer and file sharing was easier than networking two PCs together.

80 posted on 12/06/2007 12:00:12 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson