Skip to comments.
Australia navy in breast op row
BBC ^
| Sunday, 16 September 2007,
| n/a
Posted on 09/16/2007 6:37:18 PM PDT by fishhound
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: fishhound
Guess (1) what gender and (2) what subclass of that gender are doing all the howling.
A1: female
A2: feminists (either the older style khaki overall type or the new model: latte drinking, Oprah watching soccer mom types)
To: pax_et_bonum
Seems like a Salacious Ping is in order...
42
posted on
09/16/2007 7:14:13 PM PDT
by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: Candor7; fishhound
>>
Morale Boost. > Recruiting numbers for the Australian Navy are SURGING.
Clearly, their ranks are swelling.
43
posted on
09/16/2007 7:17:12 PM PDT
by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: Brilliant
There’s a difference between viewing oneself as sexy and viewing oneself as normal. The article doesn’t mention whether or not these women were completely flat-chested or merely on the small side. However, the taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay for plastic surgery beyond drastic disfigurement any more than they should have to pay for hair implants, Viagra and birth control.
44
posted on
09/16/2007 7:17:42 PM PDT
by
skr
(Car bombs and IEDs are the exclamation marks for the latest Democrats' talking points.)
To: fishhound
A super-secret Australian Navy study, given the title "Boobie Hatch", has revealed that assigning a scientifically determined number of female sailors with breast enhancements (called "floaters" by some of the less PC male sailors) to each vessel would render it virtually unsinkable.
The study further stated that if the enhancements were of the "super-large" variety, it would be possible to assign a lesser number of female sailors to a vessel.
However, the study cautioned that incorrectly assigning too many female sailors to a vessel, could result in the vessel riding too high in the water, rendering the propellers completely ineffective.
The study listed this possible problem under a heading called "Excess Boobage Is A Negative Factor".
To: Army Air Corps
IPFS? I would think it was more Topgraphically Increased Thwarted Submersion.
46
posted on
09/16/2007 7:22:29 PM PDT
by
Rastus
To: Candor7
47
posted on
09/16/2007 7:22:57 PM PDT
by
Rastus
To: fishhound
Let's see now...
- The female sailors enjoy having larger breasts.
- The heterosexual male sailors enjoy the women having larger breasts.
I mean, the only ones likely to object are the homosexual male sailors, right? And frankly, when it comes to a nice set on a woman, who gives a sh!t what a gay man thinks?
I can think of a lot worse uses of public money than enhancing a woman's self-esteem, not to mention the scenery. (Full disclosure: I also happen to think that petite breasts are wonderful too. If a woman is happy as she is, I'm fine with that, too.)
What's not to love? My tax dollars at work... I'm okay with this.
48
posted on
09/16/2007 7:25:54 PM PDT
by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: fishhound
49
posted on
09/16/2007 7:27:44 PM PDT
by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: RichInOC
more buoyantBack when, flotation devices were called Mae West's. Navy tradition, doncha know?
50
posted on
09/16/2007 7:29:02 PM PDT
by
Don Carlos
(No 8 Do)
To: RichInOC
Okay, I see the two sailors. Wheres the breast?
On a leash, silly! Remember, they're walking a breast...
51
posted on
09/16/2007 7:29:10 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Col Freeper

They can double as Barrage Balloons in a pinch.
52
posted on
09/16/2007 7:30:15 PM PDT
by
Rome2000
(Peace is not an option)
To: dayglored
What's not to love? My tax dollars at work... I'm okay with this. LOL, I'm not buying this as your only response.
I'm thinking you sent the Aussie Gov't a large check, designated to support the program.
To: dayglored
Clearly, their ranks are swelling.>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Submerged they will be a credit to the silent service.
54
posted on
09/16/2007 7:34:58 PM PDT
by
Candor7
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
To: fishhound; carlr; Maximus of Texas; wallcrawlr; Tatze; TrueKnightGalahad; blackie; null and void; ..
Gadzooks! Got...

a smoking idea!
Okay...
now stick with me!
I wonder...
if this mean that if Pamela Anderson immigrated downunder and joined the Aussie Navy...
She's be made...
{Wait for it!} a Fleet Admiral, eh?
Sheesh! Logic...
demands this stop!
Not again, Spock...
You know that Vulcan Nerve Pinch doesn't work on me!
55
posted on
09/16/2007 7:36:06 PM PDT
by
Bender2
("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
To: fishhound
bumping for provocative photos.
56
posted on
09/16/2007 7:38:17 PM PDT
by
Artemis Webb
(RON PAUL: "It will be a little bit better now with the democrats now in charge of oversight ")
To: Artemis Webb
Aussie Sailor checks chart.
No augmentation needed.
57
posted on
09/16/2007 7:42:03 PM PDT
by
Candor7
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
To: Rb ver. 2.0; MotleyGirl70; Cagey; Mr. Brightside; Taffini
They’re real, and they’re spectacular. And even if they’re not real, they’re still spectacular.
To: Col Freeper
“What’s not to love? My tax dollars at work... I’m okay with this.”
The Romans got bread and circus with thier taxes.
I would love the satisfaction of seeing my tax dollars at work....bring it on.
To: jiggyboy
Prince Charles - “Do you know what I would do if I were Bill Clinton?”
60
posted on
09/16/2007 7:48:10 PM PDT
by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson