I am going to be blasted to hell for this but I just don’t think this is right. Why does the judge get to dictate what happens to her when the police already said that she was able to go home. If anything happens to her this would be a prime example of the family getting to sue. This whole situation is just crazy and insane.
In most states, people can be released early only by the sentencing judge. And she REALLY broke laws.
DUI Sept 2006.
Then this: She was pulled over by California Highway Patrol on Jan. 15. Officers informed Hilton she was driving on a suspended license and she signed a document acknowledging she was not to drive. She then was pulled over by sheriff's deputies on Feb. 27, at which time she was charged with violating probation.
Why do the police get to dictate what happens to her when the judge already said that she was to serve time in jail?
Police officers are supposed to enforce the laws, not impose the sentence for breaking it.
This should be taught in your social studies class in sixth grade.
Look up the word, "judge."
Why does the judge get to dictate what happens to her when the police already said that she was able to go home.
You don’t seriously mean that, do you? Why does the judge get to decide on her sentence? He’s the judge. Law enforcement doesn’t set sentences, they merely carry them out. The sheriff released her contrary to her sentence and the judge’s wishes. I’d not only lock her back up, but throw a contempt of court charge at the sheriff.