Skip to comments.
Second JFK assassin 'likely'
Herald Sun ^
| 18 May 2007
Posted on 05/18/2007 3:02:33 AM PDT by Aussie Dasher
A NEW analysis of remaining bullet fragments from the 1963 assassination of US president John F Kennedy suggests a second shooter may have been involved.
The findings suggest the prevailing theory that a sole gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, killed Kennedy is wrong, according to a research team that published its findings yesterday.
The researchers "show that evidence used to rule out a second assassin is fundamentally flawed," wrote William Tobin, the main author of the report, published in the latest issue of the Annals of Applied Statistics.
Mr Tobin, a former FBI agent and forensic scientist, teamed with bullet lead analysis expert Cliff Spiegelman of Texas A & M University to re-examine the five bullet fragments recovered after Kennedy's assassination, using new scientific advances.
The findings countered testimony to the House Select Committee on Assassinations hearing in 1978 in which Dr Vincent Guinn said the bullet fragments recovered signalled that two bullets of an unusual kind of ammunition were used.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...
TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: conspiracykooks; dallas; jfk; kennedyassassination; kooks; kooksnevergiveup; secondassassin; tinfoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 last
To: Roccus
I think you’re $10 is probably more accurate but I don’t recall for sure either. I do recall that year I paid $.09 9/10’s for a gallon of gas....
81
posted on
05/18/2007 11:21:04 AM PDT
by
Proud_texan
(Just my opinion, no relationship to reality is expressed or implied.)
To: BenLurkin
According to the late Mr. Hunt it was the Masons...
You might as well just swallow your cyanide pills now buddy, you've said too much.
82
posted on
05/18/2007 12:07:36 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(It's like people who hate corn bread and hate anchovies, but love cornchovie bread.)
To: Jaysun
~~~~~~~~~~~~~from Wikipedia~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Early in the run of his show, an accident of fate made Haynes the first to report the Kennedy assassination on local news, together with his program director, Jay Watson. The two had attended the event at which Kennedy was to appear, then heard the deadly shots just after seeing the presidential motorcade round the corner. The men quickly located and interviewed eyewitnesses, going on the air shortly later: I ran three blocks back to the station, and Jay got some eyewitnesses and brought them over. He and I were the first to go live on local TV and report the terrible moment. I went home that afternoon, and Doris and I gathered our children around and discussed it as best we could. There was no direct discussion about it on Mr. Peppermint the next week. I didnt feel qualified to counsel the viewers on it. We just behaved in a subdued and respectful manner. Jerry Haynes on the Kennedy assassination[1] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Coincidence...or something more sinister? Mr. Peppermint's cane could easily have been a disguised gun.
To: kylaka
Vincent Bugliosi's "Reclaiming History"
Explains away all the JFK conspiracy BS.
Which is one reason articles like this are coming out. The conspiracy goofballs are scared.
84
posted on
05/18/2007 10:13:23 PM PDT
by
Darkwolf377
(Anti-socialist Bostonian, Anti-Illegal Immigration Bush supporter, Pro-Life Atheist)
To: drzz
Vincent Bugliosi’s “Reclaiming History”
85
posted on
05/18/2007 10:14:07 PM PDT
by
Darkwolf377
(Anti-socialist Bostonian, Anti-Illegal Immigration Bush supporter, Pro-Life Atheist)
To: Shooter 2.5
86
posted on
05/19/2007 12:27:37 PM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(NRA - Hunter '08)
To: FreedomForce
Coincidence...or something more sinister? Mr. Peppermint's cane could easily have been a disguised gun.
This is very good stuff. Maybe too good. You should check your brake lines every morning before leaving to make sure they've not been cut.
87
posted on
05/19/2007 7:24:20 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(It's like people who hate corn bread and hate anchovies, but love cornchovie bread.)
To: Darkwolf377
“Alexander sucked!”
I thought that was the whole point of the movie. (ducking for cover)
88
posted on
05/19/2007 7:40:01 PM PDT
by
Brucifer
(JF'n Kerry- "That's not just a paper cut, it's a Purple Heart!")
To: don-o
Didnt the House committee conclude there was more than one shooter? They did. But that conclusion was entiredly based on one piece of evidence, the acoustic evidence, that was later invalidated.
89
posted on
05/20/2007 6:52:11 PM PDT
by
mlo
To: Aussie Dasher
A NEW analysis of remaining bullet fragments from the 1963 assassination of US president John F Kennedy suggests a second shooter may have been involved. This news story is wrong. Even if every conclusion of this new study is correct, it does not suggest another shooter.
Previous NAA studies of the bullet fragments have said that all fragments came from only two bullets. This study says that it is *possible* that the fragments *could have* come from more than two. It doesn't suggest that there were in fact more than two, just that it can't be ruled out based on NAA.
90
posted on
05/20/2007 6:55:55 PM PDT
by
mlo
To: moonman
Isnt the 50 year sealed evidence and testimony gag order ready to expire in 6 years? The files have already been released, following the JFK Records Act passed in the early 90's.
91
posted on
05/20/2007 6:58:49 PM PDT
by
mlo
To: M.K. Borders
Yet then I have to believe that in an incredibly short time (7 seconds) Oswald missed his 1st two shots, but scored on the last very hurried one. Your facts are off. He had over 8 seconds to get off three shots, but the clock doesn't start until the first shot is fired. He hit two out of three, at short range with the target moving almost directly away from him. A fairly easy shot.
92
posted on
05/20/2007 7:01:38 PM PDT
by
mlo
To: drzz
And I remind you : the House Select Committe on Assassination said OFFICIALLY that JFK was likely killed by a conspiracy. Which is only historical trivia since the reason for that finding has been invalidated.
93
posted on
05/20/2007 7:02:59 PM PDT
by
mlo
To: Roccus
Even today, they’re advertised in Shotgun News for $39.99 or so. The contemporaries, US M-1 Garand, British Enfield, along the the German Mauser and the Russian Nagant sell for between $800 to $100 +/- depending on condition.
94
posted on
05/20/2007 7:15:02 PM PDT
by
investigateworld
(These Border Patrol guys will do more time than a Jap POW Camp commander,thanks BUSH)
To: Aussie Dasher
Bush did it!!!!
Whether you know it or not, there are some who link GHWB to JFK’s assassination. Not to be outdone, W took time off from campaigning to kill JFK,Jr. It’s on the internet so it must be true.
95
posted on
05/20/2007 7:32:03 PM PDT
by
Sapper26
('Would you feel better if they was pushed outta windas?' Archie Bunker on gun control)
To: Aussie Dasher
On multiple occasions trained snipers have recreated exactly what happened that day, and showed a sole gunman could have done everything.
96
posted on
05/20/2007 7:39:24 PM PDT
by
LukeL
(Never let the enemy pick the battle site. (Gen. George S. Patton))
To: drzz
97
posted on
05/22/2007 4:51:42 PM PDT
by
BlabItGrabIt
(The Liebrals Shure Are Getting Cocky)
To: Aussie Dasher
Bump to the 5/25/07 thread covering the same story.
98
posted on
05/25/2007 10:15:01 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Pray for the deliberately ignorant.)
To: Aussie Dasher
99
posted on
05/25/2007 10:17:40 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Pray for the deliberately ignorant.)
To: Shooter 2.5
100
posted on
05/26/2007 6:40:43 AM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(NRA - Hunter '08)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson