Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSH LIMBAUGH: 80% CHANCE HILLARY IS GOING TO BE NEXT PRESIDENT
Drudge Report | April 16, 2007

Posted on 04/16/2007 1:33:13 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement

RUSH LIMBAUGH: 80% CHANCE HILLARY IS GOING TO BE NEXT PRESIDENT


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillary; limbaugh; presidency; shewhomustnotbenamed; voldemort
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
From today's transcript...

RUSH: See, here's the thing. This is the way this is all shaping up out there. You can't criticize people on the radio. You can't do it. You can't attack them. You can't defend yourself. You can't defend others who are attacked by the Democrats. You can't do this on radio, but you can do it on the floor of Congress. You can go to the floor of Congress, the floor the House, floor of the Senate, and you can say some of the most despicable things about people -- as Tom Harkin has about me or his fellow senators. You can do that all day long and nobody will care. We're not going to stop that. Congressional hearings? How about how they try to destroy the character and the careers of judicial nominees at the Senate judiciary committee? You can do that all day long and Media Matters won't care and the Drive-By Media won't care. In fact, they'll love it. They love it. This is cool, and these senators are written up as great heroes for daring to tell the truth about these despicable conservatives who want to take over the court and deny you women the right to choose, or whatever other fear tactic they lie about. TV news hit jobs? Television news can do a hit job and destroy anybody they want. The New York Times can do a hit job and destroy anybody they want.

But you can't do this on radio, because they're going to come after you! If you do this on radio, if conservatives do this in the alternative media? I'm going to tell you what the objective is out there, folks, in case some of you are all entertained by this. Understand that this is a Democrat Party, Drive-By Media, Clinton image machine -- or Clinton machine agenda -- and it is to suppress and kill conservative information, which it labels "misinformation." The conservative information by definition, according to the template of the Drive-By Media and the Media Matters of the world, is "misinformation," but they will say that their purpose is to eliminate conservative information because it's misinformation, because there's a template, and the template is conservatives are racist, and as such they have to be banned. Of course! In the culture, we can't put up with this. They've gotta be banned from cable. They've gotta be banned from Fox News. They've gotta be banned from radio. Conservatives are also liars. That's another template: conservatives are liars. They gotta be snuffed out -- and this is the purpose of the Drive-By Media, the Democrat Party and the Clintons, who are funding with their supporters all these "watchdog" efforts.

This is Stalinist, folks. This is an attack on certain kinds of information that is protected by a template which says, "All conservative information is misinformation. It is reported by liars and racists," and that's the foundation under which they all proceed, and they're all in on it. That is what is happening. It's a general rule, they would love to do this. But we're gearing up for this election, and if you don't think that in the Drive-By Media and the Democrat Party, if you don't think 2008 is all about the Clintons getting back in the White House, you've got another thing coming. I'm going to tell you as we sit here today, there is an 80% chance that Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United States, if you look at the way things are falling out right now. They're trying to take out Rudy Giuliani. Guess what? Rudy's a "draft dodger" now. Did you see the story over the weekend? Well, Clinton was a draft dodger so they got Rudy. Rudy's a draft dodger. Whatever was said about Clinton, they're going after it. Rudy is a draft dodger. Rudy is a philanderer.

Whatever it is, they're doing everything they can to take Rudy out. Everybody says, "Well, what about Obama? What about Obama?" Folks. I know there are stories out there how the Clintons are worried about Obama and not just on this fundraising stuff, but his "godlike status to the godless" and so forth. If you're the Clinton machine, and your single competitor is somebody with less than two years experience in these foxholes, do you really think they are worried about Barack Obama? If you have fallen for the notion that the Clinton machine is sort of upside down and discombobulated and doesn't quite know what's going on here, you are falling for more myths from the media, which is designed to make it look like she has real competition so that she can overcome obstacles rather than be this candidate of inevitability -- which she is. So she's trying to make it look like she's got a serious challenge and she's up to it, and she can handle it. But I'm telling you, I know the Clinton machine. If you think they are seriously worried about somebody with as little experience as Obama has in these kinds of things, then you're falling for it.

You're being sucked in for all this. There is an 80% chance this woman is going to be next president, as things sit here today. In politics, everything can change, and it can change on a moment's notice. But all of these attacks and all of this budding attempt -- and it's not new; it's just intensifying now -- to discredit conservative information as misinformation reported by liars and racists, is about destroying the credibility of anybody who has anything in opposition, to save the Clintons and their quest to be re-ensconced in the White House. It's what all this is about. It's also about making sure that if Mrs. Clinton wins and so forth, that there won't be an alternative media. Hello, Fairness Doctrine. Hello, all of these things to just squelch it. They don't want to hear it. They want to go back to their monopoly days. That's what this is all about. So when you keep talking about this in the context of Imus, it's so much more about things having nothing to do with Imus than you would possibly believe. In fact, don't get distracted when you think about this by putting it in the context of Imus. If it was about Imus, it would be over, wouldn't it? And it's not, is it?

21 posted on 04/16/2007 1:42:11 PM PDT by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Considering how our side (voters, not candidates) is pretty much destroying itself in the primary phase and swearing they won’t vote for XX because of XX, Rush may be right. The HSWs are doing a great job splitting us up and keeping us from remembering what unifies our side.
22 posted on 04/16/2007 1:42:37 PM PDT by mnehring (McCain '08 -------------------------------------- just kidding...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I agree.
The GOP is screwing up.
The Dems will present us with a Clinton, and the sheeple will accept the turd as a gift.


23 posted on 04/16/2007 1:43:16 PM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
“I think a Democrat will win too. So far the polls show it.”

Every poll I've seen shows a Republican candidate leading all Dems.

24 posted on 04/16/2007 1:43:23 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Hi Always:

I heard the remark and found myself agreeing.

The context was Imus’s problems. He pointed out that Imus was bonified Drive By Media, except on one count: he hates Mrs. Bill .

Rush figures Mrs. Clinton unleashed her minions, I gather.

Makes sense, considering Mrs. Clinton’s plans to meet with the R-gers team.


25 posted on 04/16/2007 1:43:31 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
If Hillary wins, you would get four years of whining from her about how it is everything is someone else’s fault for being as bad as it is.
She would be an embarrassment as the first woman to be President.
Her legacy would be split between doing the best job at busting a good economy and attempting to force socialized medicine down our throats... (again)

If a Dem wins, it’s only 4 years and they will lose everything after that again.

26 posted on 04/16/2007 1:44:01 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

Thanks for posting. That is numbing.


27 posted on 04/16/2007 1:45:11 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

Anyone know the context of this statement? The headline, with no text, is on Drudge.


I was watching Rush (ditto cam) when he made the statement. Based on his other comments and my own opinion, he was reflecting on the mess that the GOP has put itself in. Too much division, RINOs, no clear solid candidate that reflects conservative values, leadership issues (there is little) — all of it. There is no fragmentation, basically, within the Dems. It does not really matter who their candidate is, what that candidate stands for, etc. They will vote without question, even if it was Joseph Stalin...well Hitlery aint that far away. The recent election showed how mindless and not unified the Repubs are.

Throw all of that in a blender and that was my take on Rush’s comment. He is as fed up with the spineless weak GOP as many of us are. Hitlery won’t win anything — it will be handed to her on a platter by a dysfunctional GOP.


28 posted on 04/16/2007 1:45:12 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
If Hillary wins, you would get four years of whining from her about how everything is someone else’s fault for things being as bad as it is.

She would be an embarrassment as the first woman to be President.

Her legacy would be split between doing the best job at busting a good economy and attempting to force socialized medicine down our throats... (again)

If a Dem wins, it’s only 4 years and they will lose everything after that again.

29 posted on 04/16/2007 1:45:16 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins

Liberals currently lead the polls in both parties. It’s deeply disgusting.


30 posted on 04/16/2007 1:45:27 PM PDT by Petronski (FRED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish; Jameison; Sabramerican; BunnySlippers; tkathy; veronica; Roccus; Jake The Goose; ...

((((RUDY PING)))


31 posted on 04/16/2007 1:46:47 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

The Virginia Tech shooting has disrupted Rush Limbaugh program for today, he is upset about this disruption and that is why he saying some very silly stuff today and uttering totally stupid statement like Hillary Clinton has 80% chance of being President when he was saying all along that her chances of being President are small. Do get me wrong, Rush Limbaugh is the best there is in talk radio and by far, he is right in the vast majority of what he said, but some days, specially when something interrupt his prepared program, he just utters very silly and wrong stuff. Today is one of these days.


32 posted on 04/16/2007 1:48:00 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy; All
If a Dem wins, it’s only 4 years and they will lose everything after that again.

Don't be so quick. The 2008 elections have a critical point in their term- 2010. In 2010 we go through the standard census redistricting process. If the Dems hold the WH & Congress, you can bet that you will have enough new lines drawn to keep them in power for another decade.

You may also have to kiss the electoral system good bye as well....

33 posted on 04/16/2007 1:48:30 PM PDT by mnehring (McCain '08 -------------------------------------- just kidding...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I think that his self proclaimed record of being correct 96% of the time, or what ever it is, is going to take a hit.


34 posted on 04/16/2007 1:48:45 PM PDT by Drennan Whyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
If a Dem wins, it’s only 4 years and they will lose everything after that again.

Are You kidding??? We thought Clinton would get 4 years after Jennifer Flowers! They voted for him for 4 more!

35 posted on 04/16/2007 1:49:59 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

I agree with Rush. The Hillary and Obama race is being staged. If Obama was not in the race, would that mean all the Obama money would go to Hillary? So istead of 44 million, she would have 69 million in one quarter? Not likely, but rather the George Soros types are splitting their support between the two candidates to create the illusion of a horse race.


36 posted on 04/16/2007 1:50:29 PM PDT by nowandlater (My 2008 Dream Ticket---Romney-Thompson or Thompson-Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nowandlater
..and a ‘horse race’ gets a lot more media time than one person coasting along..

Look for a Hillary/Obama ticket for 08..

37 posted on 04/16/2007 1:51:51 PM PDT by mnehring (McCain '08 -------------------------------------- just kidding...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
People only let the Dems in because of a 3 year 24-7 anti-Bush anti-war message on all the TV channels.

Figure that they will get over that if Democrats get the WH.
They are already getting a good look at their leadership, which has been to do nothing but block the soldier’s pay and looking to have investigations to begin a scandal.

Democrats are not ready for prime time.
Their only assets are they are loud and play dirty.

They are so bad at leading though that despite what lines are drawn, they are going to lose.
They are so bad that they can’t overcome their own negative with voters long term.

People are NOT in love with socialists/communists, so Dems have a short political life IMO.

38 posted on 04/16/2007 1:53:41 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Women were sexually attracted to Bill Clinton.
Many of them IMO voted their fantasies.

Where is that factor in Hillary (Janet Reno aside)?

39 posted on 04/16/2007 1:56:18 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

You are absolutely correct and if the Clinton machine has been reading FR they are salivating with glee.


40 posted on 04/16/2007 1:59:52 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson