Replies

Anyone know the context of this statement? The headline, with no text, is on Drudge.

I was watching Rush (ditto cam) when he made the statement. Based on his other comments and my own opinion, he was reflecting on the mess that the GOP has put itself in. Too much division, RINOs, no clear solid candidate that reflects conservative values, leadership issues (there is little) — all of it. There is no fragmentation, basically, within the Dems. It does not really matter who their candidate is, what that candidate stands for, etc. They will vote without question, even if it was Joseph Stalin...well Hitlery aint that far away. The recent election showed how mindless and not unified the Repubs are.

Throw all of that in a blender and that was my take on Rush’s comment. He is as fed up with the spineless weak GOP as many of us are. Hitlery won’t win anything — it will be handed to her on a platter by a dysfunctional GOP.

There is no fragmentation, basically, within the Dems. It does not really matter who their candidate is, what that candidate stands for, etc. They will vote without question, even if it was Joseph Stalin

You're forgetting something, aren't you? That's the fealty to the democratic platform of pro-gay, pro-abortion, pro-affirmative action, pro-illegal immigration, pro-big government, and pro-spending that all democratic candidates have to swear once they are elected. If the Republican party demanded such loyalty to the conservative cause by its candidates, you would see a lot more blind loyalty among conservatives As it stands, the RINOs are trying to co-opt most of the above listed isues.