Yes, you are right. That kind of says to me that his mother could not have been in the right frame of mind.
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/08/2007 12:03:14 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Continuing discussion: |
Posted on 03/09/2007 8:53:08 PM PST by mom4kittys
Edited on 03/09/2007 9:36:53 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Thread Number Two
Remember the cutsie that Howard pulled in Seidlin's Court. "I'm not a doctor".
“Someone said IRS in the area of the suspects will look into such things if somebody complains and provides names and behavior that hints at wrong doing.”
I heard that a person is rewarded monetarily by the IRS if you turn in someone who has cheated on their taxes.
New on TMZ:
Medical Board Investigates Second Anna Doc
Posted Apr 5th 2007 10:54AM by TMZ Staff
Filed under: Celebrity Justice, Anna Nicole Smith
TMZ has just confirmed the California Medical Board is conducting a formal investigation into Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Anna’s psychiatrist who prescribed numerous drugs that Anna ended up taking.
Eleven drugs were found in the hotel room where Anna died, all prescribed by Eroshevich. Eight were prescribed to Howard K. Stern, including chloral hydrate, the drug that was the most direct cause of Anna’s death.
This is the second Anna doc who is being investigated for prescribing practices involving Anna Nicole Smith. The Board is also investigating Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, who prescribed methadone to Smith under an alias when she was eight months pregnant.
Last September, just 5 days after Daniel died, a document shows that Dr. Eroshevich sent Dr. Kapoor a prescription wish list for Anna, which included methadone, Soma, Dilaudid and Lorazepam. Kapoor has said he did not fill the prescriptions.
I think it’s the same hat he had on in those last photos at the hospital.
Dr. Khrisvorkian, YOU ARE GOING DOWN!!!
Darn! She was funny! And informative. So I guess free speech is out when Team HKS is in control.
Can also be their friends of Virgie or strangers who have second or third hand knowledge.
That baby is as gorgeous as her mother. I can see a future in modeling for her, but dear God get her into some healthy hands to raise her right.
That was interesting. “proud parent” NOT Father!!
****************************
They don’t have an option of ‘mother’ or ‘father’, merely parent or not.
Hi...next time you update the ping list...can you add me, purrrrty please.
aggghhhh.....Krista Barf up next with Jamie...good grief
Yes, you are right. That kind of says to me that his mother could not have been in the right frame of mind.
I'm starting to picture KE as having a little experimental lab in "the old sealed room".
Feel like I'm playing CLUE.
Has today’s hearing int the Bahamas begun, or is it scheduled for later today... Since there is no inquest gag, we should be privvy to whatever goes on?
Date Set For Challenge of Coroners Act
By Quincy Parker
After the inquest into Daniel Smith’s sudden death twice came to a grinding halt, a status hearing in the matter went off on Wednesday without a hitch, and a date has been set for Howard K. Stern to challenge the constitutionality of the Coroners Act.
Daniel, the 20-year-old son of the late Anna Nicole Smith, died of a drug overdose on September 10, 2006, while visiting his mother and newborn half-sister Dannielynn Hope at Doctors Hospital.
Mr. Stern lived with Ms. Smith and claims to be Dannielynn’s father and also claimed to love Daniel “like a brother.” He is also the executor of Ms. Smith’s estate.
Mr. Stern currently has custody of the baby, and continues to live in the Eastern Road mansion he shared with Ms. Smith before she died.
The inquest into Daniel’s death is intended to discover the legal cause of death, whether it was suicide, accident or homicide.
Senior Counsel in the Office of the Attorney General Leo Brathwaite told Chief Magistrate Roger Gomez, who is hearing the inquest, that lawyers for Mr. Stern and the Office of the Attorney General (Wayne Munroe and Bernard Turner, respectively) appeared before Supreme Court Justice John Lyons on Monday.
Mr. Brathwaite said the judge set a date of April 12 for the challenge to be heard, with skeleton submissions and Mr. Stern’s affidavit setting out the grounds on which he is challenging the constitutionality of the Coroners Act due before the judge on Thursday.
The lawyer said the parties expect the matter to be dealt with on April 12.
Once Mr. Stern’s lawyer, Anthony McKinney, had pointed out that the facts of the matter still needed to be agreed – a procedural issue – both sides agreed that the status hearing set for the April 11 ought to go forward.
At that time, the jury will be present, and the lawyers involved will confer and decide on a date for the inquest to resume.
There are 40 names on the witness list for the inquest, which Mr. Gomez has said he expects to take three to four weeks. That timeframe has been completely obliterated, as testimony has not even begun in the inquest.
In fact, two weeks after the inquest started, the only forward step taken in the proceedings is the empanelling of the seven-member jury. Immediately thereafter, Mr. Stern’s legal team brought the inquest to a screeching halt with their challenge to the constitutionality of the Coroners Act.
The act has been on the books since 1910, and was most recently amended in 1993 to set up a sole Chief Coroner and an exclusive Coroners Court.
Mr. Stern wanted the judge in the inquest to issue the jurors a questionnaire, and then allow lawyers to question jurors on their answers to the questionnaire and possibly have people bumped from the jury for cause of partiality.
None of this is possible under the Coroners Act, and according to Mr. Stern, this impossibility may impede his right to a fair trial before an impartial jury. It is on these grounds that he has challenged the act.
A successful challenge of the act may have far-reaching consequences.
http://www.jonesbahamas.com/?c=45&a=12206
Can you tell us what is being said. Cable guy is here so I can’t watch TV lol
Re IHKSAM?”””””She was funny! And informative”””””
From reading her disclaimer/pause, she sounded exhausted from friendly and hateful emails. Possibly has been told to cease&desist by her ‘employer’. The site was a hobby and had previously caused her to muck up her income generating contract work.
She is probably chillin’ for a second wind - when the hearings resume.
Maybe;)
Don’t forget this evening guys!!!
Anna Nicoles Former Nannies Tell All on Controversy TV!!!!
Anna Nicole’s former Nannies break thier silence in an EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW WITH CONTROVERSY TV!!!
Did shane and anna have a sexual relationship?
Was Anna on drugs?
Where did Anna want to bury her son Daniel?
Did illegal immigrants work for Anna Nicole?
Did Shane know about the illegal immigrants?
Secrets will be revealed!!!
Watch it today @ 10pm on Cable 12 or right here on mrcontroversy.com!!!
“”””””None of this is possible under the Coroners Act, and according to Mr. Stern, this impossibility may impede his right to a fair trial before an impartial jury.”””””
He’s a little ahead of himself...as everyone here has asked..what trial? what has he been charged with?
Duh!
Expect him to claim that since he self-incriminated hisself he should be given immunity from being charged by the legal system.
Thanks...I can get confused pretty easily, but I must be getting really bad... I could have sworn there was a hearing scheduled for today regarding whether or not HKS’s could continue challenging their constitution, or, the inquest would move forward.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.